Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

129 Pages « < 103 104 105 106 107 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 New Toyota Camry 2012, is Really coming now!

views
     
kepalapening
post Aug 22 2012, 12:34 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
62 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
QUOTE(Icehart @ Aug 21 2012, 08:52 PM)
Definitely  smile.gif
But for the interior definitely the new ones win for me lah  tongue.gif
*
Yap, we sit inside not outside the car.
masz94
post Aug 22 2012, 12:40 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
16 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
From: Penang


QUOTE(kepalapening @ Aug 22 2012, 12:34 AM)
Yap, we sit inside not outside the car.
*
Lol... but outer looks need to be considered too....

I won't drive this, even fitted with Superb interior.... lol.... laugh.gif

user posted image
kepalapening
post Aug 22 2012, 12:42 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
62 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
Tody I drive from KL-Grik-KB.
This time I met about 7 new Camry on the road.
Saw only one k5 heading west, one passat that tailgating me near Kuala Kangsar.
One Mazda 3 that run a red light in order to overtake me.
Icehart
post Aug 22 2012, 12:43 AM

72.55.191.6
********
All Stars
14,899 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur & Selangor


QUOTE(kepalapening @ Aug 22 2012, 12:42 AM)
Tody I drive from KL-Grik-KB.
This time I met about 7 new Camry on the road.
Saw only one k5 heading west, one passat that tailgating me near Kuala Kangsar.
One Mazda 3 that run a red light in order to overtake me.
*
Eh, finally an owner.
How would you rate on the fuel consumption of the 2.5 model? hmm.gif (In Km/L figure)
IluvProton
post Aug 22 2012, 12:57 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
143 posts

Joined: Jul 2009

QUOTE(kepalapening @ Aug 21 2012, 07:42 PM)
Tody I drive from KL-Grik-KB.
This time I met about 7 new Camry on the road.
Saw only one k5 heading west, one passat that tailgating me near Kuala Kangsar.
One Mazda 3 that run a red light in order to overtake me.
*
dun tell me the K5 is white color
and passat was grey color
rolleyes.gif

if around KK, i always see this 2 car same colour same plate laugh.gif

those 2 car = K5 regular driver, passat is flying as always. both also A plate
kepalapening
post Aug 22 2012, 07:05 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
62 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
QUOTE(IluvProton @ Aug 22 2012, 12:57 AM)
dun tell me the K5 is white color
and passat was grey color
rolleyes.gif

if around KK, i always see this 2 car same colour same plate  laugh.gif

those 2 car = K5 regular driver, passat is flying as always. both also A plate
*
Yap, the Passat with A reg number. K5 not sure.


Added on August 22, 2012, 7:11 am
QUOTE(Icehart @ Aug 22 2012, 12:43 AM)
Eh, finally an owner.
How would you rate on the fuel consumption of the 2.5 model?  hmm.gif (In Km/L figure)
*
Kangar-kl 6 hours non stop rm75. Last time being berhemah it's only rm60.
Kl-grik-kb 12 hours rm85.

Calc yourself for Km/L. I use ron95 rm1.9/L.

This post has been edited by kepalapening: Aug 22 2012, 07:11 AM
zweimmk
post Aug 22 2012, 08:59 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Got a fairly good reading on FC now cruising at 90km/hr. consumption figures is about 5.3L/100km @ 2050RPM while 130km/hr figures is around 6.6L/100km @ 2300RPM. Nice empty highway along LATAR can get nice figures.
cybermaster98
post Aug 22 2012, 09:12 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(kepalapening @ Aug 22 2012, 07:05 AM)
Kangar-kl 6 hours non stop rm75. Last time being berhemah it's only rm60.
Kl-grik-kb 12 hours rm85.

Calc yourself for Km/L. I use ron95 rm1.9/L.
How u expect ppl to calculate when ure the one who knows the distance travelled? Not everything can Google la friend especially when nobody knows your actual start and ending points. Is it tol to tol, house to house, etc? Duration of travel doesnt help in fuel consumption readings. rclxub.gif

Anyway, FC readings you have provided before already. Your photo showed about 11km/L which equates to about 9L/100km travelling between 90-140kmph between KL & Kangar with your eco light on. Am i right?

But what ive been asking you many times is the actual full tank mileage for 100% city driving which for some reason u just dont wanna give. I wonder why.

This post has been edited by cybermaster98: Aug 22 2012, 09:28 AM
cybermaster98
post Aug 22 2012, 09:13 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(zweimmk @ Aug 22 2012, 08:59 AM)
Got a fairly good reading on FC now cruising at 90km/hr. consumption figures is about 5.3L/100km @ 2050RPM while 130km/hr figures is around 6.6L/100km @ 2300RPM. Nice empty highway along LATAR can get nice figures.
Yes that should be quite right then. But whats your RPM at 110kmph?
zweimmk
post Aug 22 2012, 09:22 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Aug 22 2012, 09:13 AM)
Yes that should be quite right then. But whats your RPM at 110kmph?
*
It's about 2100RPM or so. FC is quite respectable at 5.8 ~ 6.3L/100km

@ 130km/hr - it's about 2300RPM and FC is alternating around 6.6L/100km ~ 7.1L/100km.

I reckon if I engage cruise control, the FC figures should drop and hover around a lower figure.
cybermaster98
post Aug 22 2012, 09:29 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(zweimmk @ Aug 22 2012, 09:22 AM)
It's about 2100RPM or so. FC is quite respectable at 5.8 ~ 6.3L/100km

@ 130km/hr - it's about 2300RPM and FC is alternating around 6.6L/100km ~ 7.1L/100km.

I reckon if I engage cruise control, the FC figures should drop and hover around a lower figure.
Yes should be about there. I get 2250 RPM at 110kmph with FC about 6L/100km. But i think the cruise control will give you slightly higher readings not lower since the engine will try and maintain the set speed at all times.

This post has been edited by cybermaster98: Aug 22 2012, 09:31 AM
Icehart
post Aug 22 2012, 09:49 AM

72.55.191.6
********
All Stars
14,899 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur & Selangor


QUOTE(zweimmk @ Aug 22 2012, 08:59 AM)
Got a fairly good reading on FC now cruising at 90km/hr. consumption figures is about 5.3L/100km @ 2050RPM while 130km/hr figures is around 6.6L/100km @ 2300RPM. Nice empty highway along LATAR can get nice figures.
*
This is for Passat or Camry? rclxub.gif
I saw your siggy ride is Passat.

This post has been edited by Icehart: Aug 22 2012, 09:50 AM
cybermaster98
post Aug 22 2012, 10:03 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Icehart @ Aug 22 2012, 09:49 AM)
This is for Passat or Camry?  rclxub.gif
I saw your siggy ride is Passat.
Passat 1.8L
zweimmk
post Aug 22 2012, 10:09 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kepalapening @ Aug 22 2012, 07:05 AM)
Yap, the Passat with A reg number. K5 not sure.


Added on August 22, 2012, 7:11 am

Kangar-kl 6 hours non stop rm75. Last time being berhemah it's only rm60.
Kl-grik-kb 12 hours rm85.

Calc yourself for Km/L. I use ron95 rm1.9/L.
*
It's not a difficult thing to do, the next time you go to a petrol station and pump petrol. Write down the km travelled in trip A. it should be 600 or 700+ if you zero your trip meter at every fillup. Then look at your receipt and note down the gas up pumped in. You give us those figures, we can calculate how good your FC is
dvc323
post Aug 22 2012, 10:47 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
20 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
Anyone here interested in the custom fitting sunshades for the 2012 Toyota Camry (XV50).

Price is RM220/set .

Email: dvc2121@gmail.com

Shades on the XV40 (Front)
user posted image

Shades on the XV40 (Rear)
user posted image

user posted image

user posted image
cybermaster98
post Aug 22 2012, 10:58 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


I just happened to check out the facelift Hyundai Sonata and it seems that the new units all come with automatic dampers in addition to other add-on's. Is this true? I dont think its same as adaptive suspension but maybe close?
SUSOptiplex330
post Aug 22 2012, 11:03 AM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(zweimmk @ Aug 22 2012, 08:59 AM)
Got a fairly good reading on FC now cruising at 90km/hr. consumption figures is about 5.3L/100km @ 2050RPM while 130km/hr figures is around 6.6L/100km @ 2300RPM. Nice empty highway along LATAR can get nice figures.
*
Am I correct in saying these are Instantaneous FC reading? If yes, then these are meaningless when translate to actual Average FC.
DaBestOne
post Aug 22 2012, 11:40 AM

-LYN- 6 ★STARS★ Trader
******
Senior Member
1,329 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.



QUOTE(masz94 @ Aug 22 2012, 12:40 AM)
Lol... but outer looks need to be considered too....

I won't drive this, even fitted with Superb interior.... lol....  laugh.gif

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
Haha this one looks like Proton Juara laugh.gif
zweimmk
post Aug 22 2012, 12:46 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Optiplex330 @ Aug 22 2012, 11:03 AM)
Am I correct in saying these are Instantaneous FC reading? If yes, then these are meaningless when translate to actual Average FC.
*
Yeah but it more or less let you know what kind of ballpark figures you can expect and estimated mileage when you drive. It's not strange to estimate roughly how much distance you can travel looking at your fuel tank and consumption info, I do that fairly often just to try to lower my FC in city driving.
SUSOptiplex330
post Aug 22 2012, 12:53 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(zweimmk @ Aug 22 2012, 12:46 PM)
Yeah but it more or less let you know what kind of ballpark figures you can expect and estimated mileage when you drive. It's not strange to estimate roughly how much distance you can travel looking at your fuel tank and consumption info, I do that fairly often just to try to lower my FC in city driving.
*
In my experience, the actual Average FC could be almost double of Instant FC. So if your IFC giving you 6 liter/100km, in actual fact, you could be expecting 10 to 12 liter/100km instead. That is far off the ballpark figure.

Though I don't drive the Camry but if it can indeed give you those 10 - 12 liter figure, you should be jumping up for joy already in city. In reality, I don't think that is possible. My 2 sen.





129 Pages « < 103 104 105 106 107 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0299sec    0.45    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 09:44 PM