Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
124 Pages « < 18 19 20 21 22 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V5, Anticipating D700 replacement !

views
     
aldosoesilo
post Feb 18 2011, 11:20 AM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(heinlein @ Feb 18 2011, 11:18 AM)
I have old lens from my dad. I ransack it from the store. A very old one but still in good condition. Those lens have no AF or AF-S lens so I want to know if it work on Nikon D3100 DSLR. If it does, I might buy it  smile.gif
*
non-AF or non AF-S lens will work on D3100 but with manual focusing.
celciuz
post Feb 18 2011, 11:20 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
It will work, but you don't have metering nor auto focus. Everything is manual.
heinlein
post Feb 18 2011, 11:23 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,792 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Feb 18 2011, 11:20 AM)
non-AF or non AF-S lens will work on D3100 but with manual focusing.
*
QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 18 2011, 11:20 AM)
It will work, but you don't have metering nor auto focus. Everything is manual.
*
That should be fine. I like manual focus and playing around it first before getting serious...
razuryza
post Feb 18 2011, 11:25 AM

\('o')/~fewwwiitttt~\("0")/
*******
Senior Member
5,515 posts

Joined: Jan 2006


QUOTE(heinlein @ Feb 18 2011, 11:23 AM)
That should be fine. I like manual focus and playing around it first before getting serious...
*
i hope u wont fed up so fast.. coz u r playing with guessing there.. haha
ezrasang
post Feb 18 2011, 11:26 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
817 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: Kuala Lumpur



QUOTE(heinlein @ Feb 18 2011, 11:18 AM)
I have old lens from my dad. I ransack it from the store. A very old one but still in good condition. Those lens have no AF or AF-S lens so I want to know if it work on Nikon D3100 DSLR. If it does, I might buy it  smile.gif
*

Yes it will work, but 100% manually. If you got the patience to play, why not? brows.gif
heinlein
post Feb 18 2011, 11:29 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,792 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
QUOTE(ezrasang @ Feb 18 2011, 11:26 AM)
Yes it will work, but 100% manually. If you got the patience to play, why not?  brows.gif
*
smile.gif Yea. Since I do it as hobby instead of professionally taking photo for others. I going to enjoy it as much as I can with it
Tony Stark
post Feb 18 2011, 11:30 AM

Jarvis where are you?
******
Senior Member
1,883 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 18 2011, 11:11 AM)
So where did the D3s poison came from? Need to take note of the lens as well tongue.gif.
*
it came from somewhere tongue.gif nowadays I like to shoot vertical, so the idea of getting a bg is like so so oni..the other day balik from class I jalan2 camera shop saw tis used d3s..try it n I drool.gif .....yeah lenses too. I got some pretty decent ones. Not as expensive as urs for sure. The cheap 18-35 n cheap 50 1.4G..ordered the 24-70 n the kedai told me 3 weeks will sampai..till now no news yet..(or maybe haven't 3 weeks yet hmm.gif ) waoh this is bad poison sweat.gif
jady
post Feb 18 2011, 11:34 AM

-----camology-----
******
Senior Member
1,024 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Johor


QUOTE(kathlynn @ Feb 18 2011, 10:51 AM)
hi! after talkin to some friends, one of them suggested to get tamron 18-270mm instead of the 70-300mm for my D5000.

any cons with this? coz the price is thereabout, so am not so sure. pls pls pls advise. many thanks! smile.gif
*
I won't get a tamron if i were you. photo quality for long range lens such as tamron 18-270mm won't be good. please correct me if i'm wrong.
i will prefer 70-300mm VR
Tony Stark
post Feb 18 2011, 11:43 AM

Jarvis where are you?
******
Senior Member
1,883 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
QUOTE(jady @ Feb 18 2011, 11:34 AM)
I won't get a tamron if i were you. photo quality for long range lens such as tamron 18-270mm won't be good. please correct me if i'm wrong.
i will prefer 70-300mm VR
*
It's an allrounder lens. If one don't mind carrying more than one lens, then go with the 70300. The 18270 offers great versatility, but not so good iq.
daze
post Feb 18 2011, 11:47 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
857 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(Tony Stark @ Feb 18 2011, 11:43 AM)
It's an allrounder lens. If one don't mind carrying more than one lens, then go with the 70300. The 18270 offers great versatility, but not so good iq.
*
if all rounder. y not nikon 28-300mm ?
kathlynn
post Feb 18 2011, 11:52 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
264 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
QUOTE(daze @ Feb 18 2011, 11:47 AM)
if all rounder. y not nikon 28-300mm ?
*
bocz of $$!
pikipiki
post Feb 18 2011, 11:53 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
273 posts

Joined: Dec 2010


QUOTE(daze @ Feb 18 2011, 11:47 AM)
if all rounder. y not nikon 28-300mm ?
*
Because it's not wide enough? hmm.gif
Actually all this all rounder lens the longer end IQ is really grumble.gif
TSKTCY
post Feb 18 2011, 11:56 AM

BumbleBeeā„¢
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(pikipiki @ Feb 18 2011, 11:53 AM)
Because it's not wide enough?  hmm.gif
Actually all this all rounder lens the longer end IQ is really  grumble.gif
*
You play 28-300 before ?
Everdying
post Feb 18 2011, 11:57 AM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
or cheaper still get nikon 28-200 tongue.gif
jady
post Feb 18 2011, 12:16 PM

-----camology-----
******
Senior Member
1,024 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Johor


I'll get Nikon 18-200mm VRII for all rounder
pikipiki
post Feb 18 2011, 12:23 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
273 posts

Joined: Dec 2010


QUOTE(KTCY @ Feb 18 2011, 11:56 AM)
You play 28-300 before ?
*
Yeah just a few days ago at Funan Singapore with my friends, coz the shop didn't have the stock for the 24-120 my friend was looking so he ask us to try this out which is a bit cheaper but got longer range.

And I ask him to let me try the 70-200 2.8 too. The 28-300 at 300mm indoor I have to bump up the ISO to 6400 and there's some vignetting altho the image is quite sharp. However, when I compare it with the 70-200 it's like heaven and earth. But it's okay if you're not too demanding it's a nice lens that offer pretty sharp image but it's a lil too dark sometimes thru the viewfinder especially compare to the 70-200 which is a much faster lens.

This post has been edited by pikipiki: Feb 18 2011, 12:25 PM
iman_210
post Feb 18 2011, 12:25 PM

1.0 bar @ 221WHP
*******
Senior Member
2,684 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Central Region


QUOTE(Bliz @ Feb 18 2011, 10:04 AM)
If i were u i would skip the 17-35 F/2.8 and get the 16-35 F/4VR instead, will be collecting mine this saturday  drool.gif
*
wow how much is that? i heard the review is pretty good
aldosoesilo
post Feb 18 2011, 12:25 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(pikipiki @ Feb 18 2011, 12:23 PM)
Yeah just a few days ago at Funan Singapore with my friends, coz the shop didn't have the stock for the 24-120 my friend was looking so he ask us to try this out which is a bit cheaper but got longer range.

And I ask him to let me try the 70-200 2.8 too. The 28-300 at 300mm indoor I have to bump up the ISO to 6400 and there's some vignetting altho the image is quite sharp. However, when I compare it with the 70-200 it's like heaven and earth. But it's okay if you're not too demanding it's a nice lens that offer pretty sharp image but it's a lil too dark sometimes thru the viewfinder especially compare to the 70-200 which is a much faster lens.
*
the price tell the different yoo..
pikipiki
post Feb 18 2011, 12:28 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
273 posts

Joined: Dec 2010


QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Feb 18 2011, 12:25 PM)
the price tell the different yoo..
*
Of course flex.gif
Just wanna say it's not that useful in low light, even indoor in a mall I have to use ISO 6400, can't imagine in low light, 25600? laugh.gif
skycrawler
post Feb 18 2011, 12:29 PM

New World ^^
*******
Senior Member
2,227 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


Nikkor 28-300 is DX or FX lens?

124 Pages « < 18 19 20 21 22 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0231sec    0.23    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 04:11 AM