Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
124 Pages « < 50 51 52 53 54 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V5, Anticipating D700 replacement !

views
     
alpha_company
post Feb 22 2011, 04:19 PM

One Hand Punch Mega
*******
Senior Member
4,016 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: ★MALAYSIA★ Status: Photographing



QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 22 2011, 04:03 PM)
Better option, D700 + 2470 Nano.
*
Woottt .. gonna get it on the 8th or 9th next month with sb900...

eddy230379
post Feb 22 2011, 04:20 PM

+]>> pL@Y bEyOnD <<[+
******
Senior Member
1,676 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: LiTtLe BiG pL@NeT


QUOTE(gnome @ Feb 22 2011, 04:08 PM)
Ouch new one that price? might aswell get 85G right celciuz? drool.gif  laugh.gif  tongue.gif
*
i tried out the 85G at BTS with my D90 b4 ... the IQ was awesome beyond belief ... but i already got a Sigma 50mm f/1.4 plus i dont plan to switch to FX anytime soon ...


Added on February 22, 2011, 4:21 pm
QUOTE(alpha_company @ Feb 22 2011, 04:19 PM)
Woottt .. gonna get it on the 8th or 9th next month with sb900...
*
my dream combo which is miles away from my hands ... cry.gif

This post has been edited by eddy230379: Feb 22 2011, 04:21 PM
edwardgsk
post Feb 22 2011, 04:21 PM

I believe I can fly
*******
Senior Member
2,966 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Macross Galaxy


QUOTE(eddy230379 @ Feb 22 2011, 03:53 PM)
i rely quite a lot of VR with my 16-85 ... dont know if i will miss it or not ... but i know the IQ of the 17-55 is superb ...

scared after i buy then another 2 more months a 17-55 f/2.8 with VRII & Nano coating comes out i sure will go bonkers ...
*
Don't play wait for lenses, if you wanna play wait, can wait until neck long long I tell you. I waited months for it last time also, in the end cannot tahan then I grab myself a second hand one because scare new one price drop too fast also. End up I sell it away again because upgrading to FX even before it's replacement is out tongue.gif

No regrets and $$ loss. whistling.gif

QUOTE(gnome @ Feb 22 2011, 04:08 PM)
Ouch new one that price? might aswell get 85G right celciuz? drool.gif  laugh.gif  tongue.gif
*
85G on DX? LOL!
alpha_company
post Feb 22 2011, 04:21 PM

One Hand Punch Mega
*******
Senior Member
4,016 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: ★MALAYSIA★ Status: Photographing



QUOTE(eddy230379 @ Feb 22 2011, 04:06 PM)
orang miskin here bro ... plus i dont think i can afford FX lenses ...    cry.gif


Added on February 22, 2011, 4:07 pm

yup ... still can find new ones ... going for RM4.8k ...
*
4.8K? add a thousand more & you'll get the 2470N!!

Btw, I can get the 2470 at 4930 NEW, Nikon Malaysia set from official source.. don't ask.. secret...
edwardgsk
post Feb 22 2011, 04:22 PM

I believe I can fly
*******
Senior Member
2,966 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Macross Galaxy


QUOTE(alpha_company @ Feb 22 2011, 04:19 PM)
Woottt .. gonna get it on the 8th or 9th next month with sb900...
*
Go for D3s + 24-70.
You might regret once D700 replacement is out, just a sincere advice from me smile.gif
eddy230379
post Feb 22 2011, 04:24 PM

+]>> pL@Y bEyOnD <<[+
******
Senior Member
1,676 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: LiTtLe BiG pL@NeT


QUOTE(alpha_company @ Feb 22 2011, 04:21 PM)
4.8K? add a thousand more & you'll get the 2470N!!

Btw, I can get the 2470 at 4930 NEW, Nikon Malaysia set from official source.. don't ask.. secret...
*
shocking.gif

bro ... ur tingling my senses right now ...

Agito666
post Feb 22 2011, 04:25 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
11,861 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Bangalasia
i still have to wait half year to saving my in piggy bank to get new body...
gnome
post Feb 22 2011, 04:29 PM

- We game, do you? -
*******
Senior Member
4,925 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Feb 22 2011, 04:21 PM)
Don't play wait for lenses, if you wanna play wait, can wait until neck long long I tell you. I waited months for it last time also, in the end cannot tahan then I grab myself a second hand one because scare new one price drop too fast also. End up I sell it away again because upgrading to FX even before it's replacement is out tongue.gif

No regrets and $$ loss. whistling.gif
85G on DX? LOL!
*
Well celciuz did use it on DX before jumping to FX what tongue.gif

If not because of him, no one here will bother about 85G also laugh.gif

Joking obviously tongue.gif
eddy230379
post Feb 22 2011, 04:33 PM

+]>> pL@Y bEyOnD <<[+
******
Senior Member
1,676 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: LiTtLe BiG pL@NeT


QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Feb 22 2011, 04:21 PM)
Don't play wait for lenses, if you wanna play wait, can wait until neck long long I tell you. I waited months for it last time also, in the end cannot tahan then I grab myself a second hand one because scare new one price drop too fast also. End up I sell it away again because upgrading to FX even before it's replacement is out tongue.gif

No regrets and $$ loss. whistling.gif
85G on DX? LOL!
*
i couldnt find any superb condition 17-55 thats why i thought of getting it new ... like i said ... i got no plan to upgrade to FX anytime soon ... the 24-70 is really tempting but not wide enuf on DX ...
edwardgsk
post Feb 22 2011, 04:33 PM

I believe I can fly
*******
Senior Member
2,966 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Macross Galaxy


QUOTE(alpha_company @ Feb 22 2011, 04:21 PM)
Btw, I can get the 2470 at 4930 NEW, Nikon Malaysia set from official source.. don't ask.. secret...
*
Sure or not? Get me 1 5 copies come whistling.gif


Added on February 22, 2011, 4:36 pm
QUOTE(eddy230379 @ Feb 22 2011, 04:33 PM)
i couldnt find any superb condition 17-55 thats why i thought of getting it new ... like i said ... i got no plan to upgrade to FX anytime soon ... the 24-70 is really tempting but not wide enuf on DX ...
*
17-55 quite a lot people selling USED one at 3.5k like that, and from what I see, all optics conditions are 95% above one, worth trying smile.gif

And dude, I'm not the person recommending 24-70 to you yeah sweat.gif

This post has been edited by edwardgsk: Feb 22 2011, 04:36 PM
eddy230379
post Feb 22 2011, 04:38 PM

+]>> pL@Y bEyOnD <<[+
******
Senior Member
1,676 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: LiTtLe BiG pL@NeT


QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Feb 22 2011, 04:33 PM)
Sure or not? Get me 1 5 copies come whistling.gif


Added on February 22, 2011, 4:36 pm
17-55 quite a lot people selling USED one at 3.5k like that, and from what I see, all optics conditions are 95% above one, worth trying smile.gif

And dude, I'm not the person recommending 24-70 to you yeah  sweat.gif
*
sorry bro .. i know u didnt recommend me the 24-70 ... just saying generally my opinion bout the 24-70 on DX format ... anyway, any links on where i can find a good copy of a used 17-55 ???
celciuz
post Feb 22 2011, 04:47 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Feb 22 2011, 04:21 PM)
Don't play wait for lenses, if you wanna play wait, can wait until neck long long I tell you. I waited months for it last time also, in the end cannot tahan then I grab myself a second hand one because scare new one price drop too fast also. End up I sell it away again because upgrading to FX even before it's replacement is out tongue.gif

No regrets and $$ loss. whistling.gif
85G on DX? LOL!
*
I went to KLIMS the first weekend (Saturday) with D90 + 85G,

user posted image

Then got annoyed with the range and bought D700+MB-D10 the next Monday laugh.gif

user posted image

QUOTE(alpha_company @ Feb 22 2011, 04:21 PM)
4.8K? add a thousand more & you'll get the 2470N!!

Btw, I can get the 2470 at 4930 NEW, Nikon Malaysia set from official source.. don't ask.. secret...
*
Spill the bean!!!
Agito666
post Feb 22 2011, 04:58 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
11,861 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Bangalasia
QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 22 2011, 04:47 PM)
I went to KLIMS the first weekend (Saturday) with D90 + 85G,
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
seems not big different between two photos hmm.gif
or i really noob cannot spot the different from thumbnails? unsure.gif
(welcome all sifu come train my eyes sharp sharp so i can know how to judge picture laugh.gif )

This post has been edited by Agito666: Feb 22 2011, 05:01 PM
bbuser91
post Feb 22 2011, 04:58 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 22 2011, 03:54 PM)
If you tell me something like D700 which dropped price since it was introduced I think reasonable... but this 1755 f/2.8 so far not yet drop price before right? A bit risky tongue.gif. The new one probably would be the same price tag.

Not to mention this lens quite old already. The Canon have IS for theirs, Nikon should be coming up with a 4 stop technology VR too.
*
If got VR come out , i think i will straight go and buy ><" but i give up waiting , go for tamron , at first wanna get tokina 11-16 , too bad cannot autofocus ! feel like want to change body that time ><"


QUOTE(eddy230379 @ Feb 22 2011, 04:38 PM)
sorry bro .. i know u didnt recommend me the 24-70 ... just saying generally my opinion bout the 24-70 on DX format ... anyway, any links on where i can find a good copy of a used 17-55 ???
*
photomalaysia , lowyat forum =)

search slowly , sure can find one , no worries


Added on February 22, 2011, 5:02 pm
QUOTE(eddy230379 @ Feb 22 2011, 03:50 PM)
guys ... any idea if Nikon is going to refresh their current DX 17-55 f/2.8 ???

dont know if i should wait or get it early next month ...
*
Ask yourself izzit the range for you now is important or not ? if very important go and get now no need wait

Like me , not so important , so i dun mind to wait even though i 90% know they wont upgrade the lens to VR so fast yet.

This post has been edited by bbuser91: Feb 22 2011, 05:02 PM
celciuz
post Feb 22 2011, 05:07 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(Agito666 @ Feb 22 2011, 04:58 PM)
seems not big different between two photos  hmm.gif
or i really noob cannot spot the different from thumbnails?  unsure.gif
(welcome all sifu come train my eyes sharp sharp so i can know how to judge picture  laugh.gif )
*
Haha, my point is 85G can be used on DX too tongue.gif. I've used both D90 and D700 with 85G on the same event itself tongue.gif.

Compare the distance differences between FX and DX,

D700, Subject Distance 1.78 m

D90, Subject Distance 2.66 m

More or less similar magnification of subject.

This post has been edited by celciuz: Feb 22 2011, 05:09 PM
edwardgsk
post Feb 22 2011, 05:11 PM

I believe I can fly
*******
Senior Member
2,966 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Macross Galaxy


QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 22 2011, 05:07 PM)
Haha, my point is 85G can be used on DX too tongue.gif. I've used both D90 and D700 with 85G on the same event itself tongue.gif.

Compare the distance differences between FX and DX,

D700, Subject Distance  1.78 m

D90, Subject Distance  2.66 m

More or less similar magnification of subject.
*
Perspective different, bokeh also different tongue.gif
Agito666
post Feb 22 2011, 05:12 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
11,861 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Bangalasia
QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 22 2011, 05:07 PM)
Haha, my point is 85G can be used on DX too tongue.gif. I've used both D90 and D700 with 85G on the same event itself tongue.gif.
*
so your point is the lens it self can use on D90 and D700 perfectly without distortion? laugh.gif
still got many thing wan leech learn from sifus...but wont play so "geng" lens...now my account still in negative 3k debt for this year to pay to my dad...then baru can save money for D7000 (because choose D90 my friend said later will outdate soon, D3100 no AF motor and hard to play with 50mm 1.8f , so D7000 is my choice lol, upgrade from 70 to 7000 sounds nice)
eddy230379
post Feb 22 2011, 05:12 PM

+]>> pL@Y bEyOnD <<[+
******
Senior Member
1,676 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: LiTtLe BiG pL@NeT


QUOTE(bbuser91 @ Feb 22 2011, 04:58 PM)
If got VR come out , i think i will straight go and buy ><" but i give up waiting , go for tamron , at first wanna get tokina 11-16 , too bad cannot autofocus ! feel like want to change body that time ><"
photomalaysia , lowyat forum =)

search slowly , sure can find one , no worries


Added on February 22, 2011, 5:02 pm

Ask yourself izzit the range for you now is important or not ? if very important go and get now no need wait

Like me , not so important , so i dun mind to wait even though i 90% know they wont upgrade the lens to VR so fast yet.
*
i am actually planning to replace my 16-85 ... its going to be a long term investment in lens for me ... after this i dont plan to purchase any additional lens in a year or so time ... just afraid that after i purchase it the new version comes out ...
bbuser91
post Feb 22 2011, 05:18 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
QUOTE(eddy230379 @ Feb 22 2011, 05:12 PM)
i am actually planning to replace my 16-85 ... its going to be a long term investment in lens for me ... after this i dont plan to purchase any additional lens in a year or so time ... just afraid that after i purchase it the new version comes out ...
*
Ic... i also wan replace my kit len ...

Looking for tamron or if nikon comes out new VR 1755mm

i dunnoe whether my suggestion good or not lar , you go to shop try and play 1755mm w/o VR , see whether is very important for you or not . if not really go and get 1755 , no need wait for the new version

i wan tokina 11-16 f2.8 but too bad cannot autofocus , make me sien !
aldosoesilo
post Feb 22 2011, 05:18 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(eddy230379 @ Feb 22 2011, 10:59 AM)
how is ur 18-70 doing bro ??? feel any difference with ur kitty lens ???
*
18-70 is tack sharp bro. I love this lens. I think it will stay with me as long as I am using DX tongue.gif
the only lacking thing is it has no VR, therefore I have to train my hand from shaking. rclxub.gif
initially was a bit hard. but training makes perfect isn't it? tongue.gif
in low light very hard to use it since no VR. in the afternoon. this is the king tongue.gif

QUOTE(Tony Stark @ Feb 22 2011, 12:00 PM)
after ktcy post pikipiki's pm, I don't see him already..
Well I like this one. Very nice
*
Thanks for the feedback bro. Will train more tongue.gif

QUOTE(geekster129 @ Feb 22 2011, 12:35 PM)
Color is brilliant, focus is sharp, but picture lacks subject and theme. Are you intend to shoot trees in general?


Added on February 22, 2011, 12:41 pm
Very dangerous to generalize what wedding shots are. You'll never know what kind of style the couple will like.

Discuss properly with couple/client what kind of character/style they want in their wedding shots. Act smart and shooting it the way you like will send your wedding photography down the drain.
*
Nop. the first picture I am showing the reflection of water. where in the second I am showing cloud tongue.gif
Maybe my composition is not good enough doh.gif
Will do better.

QUOTE(hosty @ Feb 22 2011, 01:13 PM)
First picture feels plain.

The second picture is nice, my eyes were drawn to the sky and clouds. Nice colours. The light post on the left is a distraction XD
*
YEAh.. It was Sigma 10-20 where famous of its distraction bro tongue.gif

QUOTE(daze @ Feb 22 2011, 01:38 PM)
Prefer this one.
maybe show abit more sky could balance out more & give a gentle burn to the upper portion of the sky to give a little more punchy & dramatic sky
*
I couldn't do any post processing bro. because my laptop. spoiled in the assignment week. OMG! doh.gif

QUOTE(kakisemut @ Feb 22 2011, 01:52 PM)
good for you..
practice make perfect...
hehehe...


Added on February 22, 2011, 1:56 pm

mean 116 is not good?
i want to funding for wide lens...
need some reversion about the lens first...


Added on February 22, 2011, 2:02 pm
which one u recommended?


Added on February 22, 2011, 2:09 pm

waaa...
sharpness is different...
so,we should sell our hoya??
or??


Added on February 22, 2011, 2:14 pm
waah...
the color is so nice bro...
*
Thanks bro. thumbup.gif


124 Pages « < 50 51 52 53 54 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0174sec    0.46    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 07:33 AM