Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
133 Pages « < 125 126 127 128 129 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Sandy Bridge Overclocking V1, 2500K/2600K/2700K | LGA1155 P67.Z68.Z77

views
     
torino
post Apr 19 2012, 11:16 AM

><
*****
Senior Member
978 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: Sitiawan, Perak


QUOTE(owikh84 @ Apr 19 2012, 11:05 AM)
weird, since you have set back to default settings, EIST, C1E, C3/C6 is supposed to be enabled/auto. Just make sure that:
In bios enable EIST (speedstep), C1E, C3/6
In windows, change power management to balanced or power saver.
Other than that I really have no idea already. Maybe other forumers got idea  blush.gif
*
ya..i did checked it twice...its enabled and auto...but still the monitor reads the frequency as 3.50Ghz..its just happen after i make a OC test on it... icon_question.gif
TSowikh84
post Apr 19 2012, 11:35 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(torino @ Apr 19 2012, 11:16 AM)
ya..i did checked it twice...its enabled and auto...but still the monitor reads the frequency as 3.50Ghz..its just happen after i make a OC test on it... icon_question.gif
*
CPU-Z?
torino
post Apr 19 2012, 12:21 PM

><
*****
Senior Member
978 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: Sitiawan, Perak


QUOTE(owikh84 @ Apr 19 2012, 11:35 AM)
CPU-Z?
*
yup..and realtemp as well..
Dennos
post Apr 19 2012, 01:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,736 posts

Joined: Dec 2006



QUOTE(torino @ Apr 19 2012, 12:21 PM)
yup..and realtemp as well..
*
wait for a while. 'speedstep' wont 'kick in' immediately.
torino
post Apr 19 2012, 02:05 PM

><
*****
Senior Member
978 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: Sitiawan, Perak


QUOTE(Dennos @ Apr 19 2012, 01:16 PM)
wait for a while. 'speedstep' wont 'kick in' immediately.
*
for a'while'? for how long? its been a day though... hmm.gif


Added on April 20, 2012, 6:15 pmOk this is my prob....setting back my bios to default....at 1st it shows turbo frequency is 3700MHz...after stress test, this is what i found...


» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Is it normal? seems kinda weird because before i did any overclock, it can boost up to 3.7Ghz...to make it weirder, the cpu's constantly shows 3.4-3.5Ghz even the load is about 20-30%

Please guide and help me on this... icon_question.gif

This post has been edited by torino: Apr 20 2012, 06:15 PM
tanghm
post Apr 20 2012, 10:17 PM

SSRI Addict
******
Senior Member
1,972 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang Valley

I believe there is a Thermal limit being set somewhere. Show us your BIOS setting.

By default, Intel's spec is 95W TDP, meaning if the CPU total power consumption is capped at 95W. If all four cores are active and total power utilised exceeds 95W, it will automatically throttle down the cores and run within the TDP limit.

To overcome this, you will need to raise the TDP limit, in ASUS bios this is called CPU Power Management.

Becareful though, by lifting the TDP cap, your processor will tend to run hotter.
torino
post Apr 21 2012, 12:55 AM

><
*****
Senior Member
978 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: Sitiawan, Perak


QUOTE(tanghm @ Apr 20 2012, 10:17 PM)
I believe there is a Thermal limit being set somewhere. Show us your BIOS setting.

By default, Intel's spec is 95W TDP, meaning if the CPU total power consumption is capped at 95W. If all four cores are active and total power utilised exceeds 95W, it will automatically throttle down the cores and run within the TDP limit.

To overcome this, you will need to raise the TDP limit, in ASUS bios this is called CPU Power Management.

Becareful though, by lifting the TDP cap, your processor will tend to run hotter.
*
Ya sure..these are my setting taken by phone camera just now...note that i just REENABLED EPU..but still it possess the same frequency...

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


If got anything to change, just tell me...i'll try my best to overcome my noobness... blush.gif
tanghm
post Apr 21 2012, 12:06 PM

SSRI Addict
******
Senior Member
1,972 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang Valley

Friend, read up on Intel Turbo Boost Technology for a better understanding on how this works.

The 3.7GHz Turbo will only work if there is one core utilisation, if 4 cores are utilised all the cores will not go to 3.7GHz, it will go to 3.4GHz instead as per design of not to exceed the TDP.

Refer to this image for clearer explanation.

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-Intel-...rs.43714.0.html
user posted image

If you were to manually set a Turbo multiplier, this will overwrite the default setting and all four cores will go to the turbo value you specified.

This post has been edited by tanghm: Apr 21 2012, 12:08 PM
torino
post Apr 21 2012, 01:10 PM

><
*****
Senior Member
978 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: Sitiawan, Perak


QUOTE(tanghm @ Apr 21 2012, 12:06 PM)
Friend, read up on Intel Turbo Boost Technology for a better understanding on how this works.

The 3.7GHz Turbo will only work if there is one core utilisation, if 4 cores are utilised all the cores will not go to 3.7GHz, it will go to 3.4GHz instead as per design of not to exceed the TDP.

Refer to this image for clearer explanation.

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-Intel-...rs.43714.0.html
user posted image

If you were to manually set a Turbo multiplier, this will overwrite the default setting and all four cores will go to the turbo value you specified.
*
ok i got the point...so how about my first prob...the frequency stays 3.4-3.5Ghz even the load is roughly 20-30% only....

i sense that this doesnt related to turbo boost, its something else... hmm.gif
tanghm
post Apr 21 2012, 01:57 PM

SSRI Addict
******
Senior Member
1,972 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang Valley

Try this.

In your screenshot #4, set C3 and C6 to Enabled instead of Auto.

*20~30% load is enough to set the processor to kick into 3.4GHz+, try closing all programmes and monitor again under 0~1% load it EIST should kick in and set the processor to 1.6GHz when idle.

This post has been edited by tanghm: Apr 21 2012, 02:03 PM
torino
post Apr 21 2012, 03:43 PM

><
*****
Senior Member
978 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: Sitiawan, Perak


QUOTE(tanghm @ Apr 21 2012, 01:57 PM)
Try this.

In your screenshot #4, set C3 and C6 to Enabled instead of Auto.

*20~30% load is enough to set the processor to kick into 3.4GHz+, try closing all programmes and monitor again under 0~1% load it EIST should kick in and set the processor to 1.6GHz when idle.
*
hmm, i've tried already...i can see some change in frequency...(sudden drop to 1.6 then going up back to 3.4/3.5 several times...
im not sure which programs do i need to close, already removed all active applications except in service tab and process tab...

maybe its because service/process tab requires 20-30% load of the system... hmm.gif sound logic but thanks for your help...
tncdatou
post Apr 21 2012, 07:21 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
15 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
Hello guys i'm on the process of trying to OC my i5 2500k to 4.5Ghz and i pass Intelburn test and LinX test... i set my Vcore to 1.39... Everything is fine until i restart or on off my computer..
When i turning on my desktop it will shows that there is fail boot and ask me either enter bios or reset everything and reboot...
Temperature still in acceptable range..
Can someone enlighten me is there something wrong here?
My mobo is gigabyte z77x-d3h, and using noctua nhd-14 cooler
Thanks.

hhoong
post Apr 24 2012, 11:35 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
172 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
Hi All,

i have this setup, running on CM 212 Evo, is that vcore too high? i set it 1.285v at BIOS. need advices from all the sifus here rclxub.gif

1st lowest vcore that passes IBT and now running prime95

user posted image
torino
post Apr 25 2012, 12:44 AM

><
*****
Senior Member
978 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: Sitiawan, Perak


IMO, yours is fine...sweet spot for vcore is 1.3-1.4V based on what i have read...

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


hhoong
post Apr 25 2012, 01:00 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
172 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
happy.gif nice nice ... and hey i have the same setup as u ... almost tongue.gif

Intel® Core™ i5-2500K @ 4.7 GHz | Cooler Master 212 Evo with dual Artic Cooling F12 PWM (P/P) | Asus P8Z77-M | G-Skill Ripjaws X 8GB (2x4GB) | <--

Well CPU plan to stay at 4.5Ghz tongue.gif
rudolfjie
post Apr 26 2012, 02:54 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
350 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


QUOTE(hhoong @ Apr 25 2012, 01:00 AM)
happy.gif nice nice ... and hey i have the same setup as u ... almost tongue.gif

Intel® Core™ i5-2500K @ 4.7 GHz | Cooler Master 212 Evo with dual Artic Cooling F12 PWM (P/P) | Asus P8Z77-M | G-Skill Ripjaws X 8GB (2x4GB) | <--

Well CPU plan to stay at 4.5Ghz tongue.gif
*
Mind telling me what the vcore and temp in full load for 4.7?
hhoong
post Apr 26 2012, 04:52 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
172 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
QUOTE(rudolfjie @ Apr 26 2012, 02:54 PM)
Mind telling me what the vcore and temp in full load for 4.7?
*
im running on 4.5 only ... vcore set to 1.295 sad.gif prime95 fail after 10 hour on 1.285 and 1.290.
my idle about 40~42, full load can up to 70~73

torino is the one running on 4.7 notworthy.gif
torino
post Apr 26 2012, 05:00 PM

><
*****
Senior Member
978 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: Sitiawan, Perak


QUOTE(hhoong @ Apr 26 2012, 04:52 PM)
im running on 4.5 only ... vcore set to 1.295 sad.gif prime95 fail after 10 hour on 1.285 and 1.290.
my idle about 40~42, full load can up to 70~73

torino is the one running on 4.7  notworthy.gif
*
nah...for the time being im using auto setting..just want to test it first...
vcore pretty well i thing...1.39+-...temp somewhere around 80 degree...but it increase gradually since im using elite 311 plus, pretty bad for high OC.. blush.gif

i have no time for manual setting, waiting for my 4 months study break to test that.. brows.gif
hhoong
post Apr 27 2012, 11:30 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
172 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
Waaaa so hard to get it to stable sad.gif

prime95 fail in 1 core again ... raise to 1.300 for vcore to test again sad.gif
rudolfjie
post Apr 27 2012, 02:35 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
350 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


QUOTE(hhoong @ Apr 26 2012, 04:52 PM)
im running on 4.5 only ... vcore set to 1.295 sad.gif prime95 fail after 10 hour on 1.285 and 1.290.
my idle about 40~42, full load can up to 70~73

torino is the one running on 4.7  notworthy.gif
*
73c huh, i think sandy bridge can handle 80+c, but for long term 24/7 pc, i only set it at 4.3Ghz (kia si) blush.gif
vcore 1.22 something, ideal 22-24c full load never exceed 50c


Added on April 27, 2012, 2:36 pm
QUOTE(torino @ Apr 26 2012, 05:00 PM)
nah...for the time being im using auto setting..just want to test it first...
vcore pretty well i thing...1.39+-...temp somewhere around 80 degree...but it increase gradually since im using elite 311 plus, pretty bad for high OC.. blush.gif

i have no time for manual setting, waiting for my 4 months study break to test that.. brows.gif
*
so you mean auto oc bring you up to 4.7ghz?

This post has been edited by rudolfjie: Apr 27 2012, 02:36 PM

133 Pages « < 125 126 127 128 129 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0223sec    0.40    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 01:30 PM