Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
133 Pages « < 126 127 128 129 130 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Sandy Bridge Overclocking V1, 2500K/2600K/2700K | LGA1155 P67.Z68.Z77

views
     
hhoong
post Apr 27 2012, 06:11 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
172 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
QUOTE(rudolfjie @ Apr 27 2012, 02:35 PM)
73c huh, i think sandy bridge can handle 80+c, but for long term 24/7 pc, i only set it at 4.3Ghz (kia si) blush.gif
vcore 1.22 something, ideal 22-24c full load never exceed 50c


Added on April 27, 2012, 2:36 pm
so you mean auto oc bring you up to 4.7ghz?
*
ya bad huh sad.gif too high vcore sad.gif and my room is hot also, but how often we run full load tongue.gif
i worried more on my GC compare to proc ... now just wan to find the 'magic' number for my 4.5ghz to stable rclxub.gif
hhoong
post Apr 30 2012, 11:32 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
172 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
just to ask, which measurement will be the correct one for the temp?

the core temp and CPUID hardware monitor show similar temp but asus one show significantly lower @_@

Attached Image
torino
post Apr 30 2012, 11:42 PM

><
*****
Senior Member
978 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: Sitiawan, Perak


QUOTE(rudolfjie @ Apr 27 2012, 02:35 PM)
so you mean auto oc bring you up to 4.7ghz?
*
yup..but i did check my vcore not too exceed 1.4 at least...
hypermax
post May 3 2012, 02:33 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
2,524 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Beneath the starry night


Guys, my 2500k running at 4.6ghz at vcore 1.4. Prime stable 8 hrs. Is the vcore too high?
tanghm
post May 3 2012, 08:27 PM

SSRI Addict
******
Senior Member
1,972 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang Valley

1.4V at 4.6GHz is too high.

My I7 2700k at 4.6GHz (not I5 2500k) now only runs at 1.33V using Manual Offset +0.060V
ati radeon
post May 3 2012, 10:17 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
454 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: kuala lumpur


hey there,

i have i5 2500k instead of ivy bridge for z77 mobo as its proven for now that 2500k is more stable than ivy during overclock.

my system is as stated in my siggy, can cm 212 evo do a nice enough cooling job to 4.5 GHz?
lengchai86
post May 4 2012, 01:30 AM

P90
******
Senior Member
1,162 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: 8.8.4.4



MSI event : http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/2324007

QUOTE(ati radeon @ May 3 2012, 10:17 PM)
hey there,

i have i5 2500k instead of ivy bridge for z77 mobo as its proven for now that 2500k is more stable than ivy during overclock.

my system is as stated in my siggy, can cm 212 evo do a nice enough cooling job to 4.5 GHz?
*
as long as ambient temp is cold/ not so warm, then its enough.
just make sure the temp not going over 80'C nod.gif

This post has been edited by lengchai86: May 4 2012, 01:33 AM
hypermax
post May 4 2012, 01:20 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
2,524 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Beneath the starry night


QUOTE(tanghm @ May 3 2012, 08:27 PM)
1.4V at 4.6GHz is too high.

My I7 2700k at 4.6GHz (not I5 2500k) now only runs at 1.33V using Manual Offset +0.060V
*
What to do. Anything below that won't boot. cry.gif
lengchai86
post May 4 2012, 02:09 PM

P90
******
Senior Member
1,162 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: 8.8.4.4



QUOTE(hypermax @ May 4 2012, 01:20 PM)
What to do. Anything below that won't boot.  cry.gif
*
if you can keep the temp below 80'C during load then its consider safe. nod.gif
hypermax
post May 4 2012, 05:37 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
2,524 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Beneath the starry night


QUOTE(lengchai86 @ May 4 2012, 02:09 PM)
if you can keep the temp below 80'C during load then its consider safe.  nod.gif
*
when running prime it is below 80C, but when running IBT max temp 93 with average of 80 plus. Using Noctua D14 paired with 2 GTs

I have also tried 4.8Ghz at 1.488vcore (max load). Prime stable. But dare not try IBT sweat.gif
lengchai86
post May 4 2012, 05:47 PM

P90
******
Senior Member
1,162 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: 8.8.4.4



QUOTE(hypermax @ May 4 2012, 05:37 PM)
when running prime it is below 80C, but when running IBT max temp 93 with average of 80 plus. Using Noctua D14 paired with 2 GTs

I have also tried 4.8Ghz at 1.488vcore (max load). Prime stable. But dare not try IBT  sweat.gif
*
time to move to WC 360 rclxms.gif + aircond room
hhoong
post May 4 2012, 06:12 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
172 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
actually what software u use to monitor?

i use CPUID Hardware Monitor it show 10 degree higher compare to using asus one @_@

i OC to 4.5Ghz full load asus showing 60+ but CPUID Hardware Monitor show 70+ @_@
hypermax
post May 4 2012, 07:56 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
2,524 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Beneath the starry night


QUOTE(lengchai86 @ May 4 2012, 05:47 PM)
time to move to WC 360  rclxms.gif  + aircond room
*
Actually, i am kinda shocked to see my temp is so high despite using the "king of aircooling". Perhaps it was all hyped up mad.gif

QUOTE(hhoong @ May 4 2012, 06:12 PM)
actually what software u use to monitor?

i use CPUID Hardware Monitor it show 10 degree higher compare to using asus one @_@

i OC to 4.5Ghz full load asus showing 60+ but CPUID Hardware Monitor show 70+ @_@
*
Use real temp. it reads your distance from TJmax

This post has been edited by hypermax: May 4 2012, 07:56 PM
hhoong
post May 4 2012, 11:30 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
172 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
core temp, real temp and CPUID Hardware Monitor show almost similar temp reading. asus software still showing about 10 degree lower ... @_@
tanghm
post May 6 2012, 01:47 PM

SSRI Addict
******
Senior Member
1,972 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang Valley

QUOTE(hhoong @ May 4 2012, 06:12 PM)
actually what software u use to monitor?

i use CPUID Hardware Monitor it show 10 degree higher compare to using asus one @_@

i OC to 4.5Ghz full load asus showing 60+ but CPUID Hardware Monitor show 70+ @_@
*
ASUS software reports 10'C lower than the actual DTS temp, this is a well known issue for ASUS bios.
TSowikh84
post May 6 2012, 02:08 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



Core temp is not the same as CPU temp.
Asus like other brands of mobos usually will report CPU temp. Core temp is more important here.
hhoong
post May 6 2012, 04:21 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
172 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
sad.gif im so hoping that asus one is the correct one ... sad.gif
lengchai86
post May 6 2012, 06:51 PM

P90
******
Senior Member
1,162 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: 8.8.4.4



QUOTE(owikh84 @ May 6 2012, 02:08 PM)
Core temp is not the same as CPU temp.
Asus like other brands of mobos usually will report CPU temp. Core temp is more important here.
*
i try to set the multi to 50-53 but apparently cpuz in the windows still show 100 X 49 = 4.9Ghz only..
end up with increase the fsb to 103... any advice?
user posted image
TSowikh84
post May 6 2012, 07:17 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



Sounds abnormal. By rights the BIOS wont down multi to 49x automatically for you if failed OC. Try updating BIOS, uninstall MSI OC Utility or put the CPU on other mobo and see how.

It's an ES maybe a rejected chip & capped at 49x LOL. I also saw someone selling 2600 but unlockable like 2600K.
lengchai86
post May 6 2012, 07:51 PM

P90
******
Senior Member
1,162 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: 8.8.4.4



QUOTE(owikh84 @ May 6 2012, 07:17 PM)
Sounds abnormal. By rights the BIOS wont down multi to 49x automatically for you if failed OC. Try updating BIOS, uninstall MSI OC Utility or put the CPU on other mobo and see how.

It's an ES maybe a rejected chip & capped at 49x LOL. I also saw someone selling 2600 but unlockable like 2600K.
*
i didn't install MSI OC utility.. ok will try on fatal1ty Z68 tonight smile.gif

133 Pages « < 126 127 128 129 130 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0342sec    0.75    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 11:45 AM