Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
123 Pages « < 99 100 101 102 103 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 AMD® Socket AM2&AM3 Overclocking V24, Thuban or Bulldozer!? Its 6-Season

views
     
shajack
post Apr 6 2011, 08:32 PM

semi-retired@everything
*****
Senior Member
872 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Kuala Lumpur(juz my body,LOl)


wanna ask...im setting my memory manually at this setting
9-9-9-27-27-2t fsb:dram 1:4,803.7mhz with 1.65v...why is it taking longer to complete hyperPI 32M...loop 13 into 12m already

This post has been edited by shajack: Apr 6 2011, 08:35 PM
byfc2010
post Apr 6 2011, 08:48 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
947 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
From: Penang


QUOTE(ah_khoo @ Apr 6 2011, 03:31 PM)
get winovava 8gb... can do 1600 @ 7-7-7 w/ 1.62v... not bad + berry affordable. smile.gif
*
my winova can do 1600 7-10-8 only... cry.gif
dafreak
post Apr 6 2011, 08:49 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,064 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Star Stuff


longer to complete as to compared to what settings?
shajack
post Apr 6 2011, 08:53 PM

semi-retired@everything
*****
Senior Member
872 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Kuala Lumpur(juz my body,LOl)


auto...9-9-9-27-34,i think...ratio 3:8,voltage 1.5v...
dafreak
post Apr 6 2011, 09:53 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,064 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Star Stuff


try using 1T instead

p.s. post the pics so we can compare easily smile.gif
ah_khoo
post Apr 6 2011, 10:27 PM

- No Action Talk Only -
Group Icon
Elite
8,103 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu.


QUOTE(shajack @ Apr 6 2011, 08:32 PM)
wanna ask...im setting my memory manually at this setting
9-9-9-27-27-2t fsb:dram 1:4,803.7mhz with 1.65v...why is it taking longer to complete hyperPI 32M...loop 13 into 12m already
*
i think it's normal, larger ram on a stick = higher d latency... or something like that if i'm not mistaken... smile.gif

QUOTE(byfc2010 @ Apr 6 2011, 08:48 PM)
my winova can do 1600 7-10-8 only...  cry.gif
*
8gb kit ah bro? trfc must be 160ns regardless 4/8gb... wink.gif
byfc2010
post Apr 7 2011, 02:20 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
947 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
From: Penang


QUOTE(ah_khoo @ Apr 6 2011, 10:27 PM)
i think it's normal, larger ram on a stick = higher d latency...  or something like that if i'm not mistaken...  smile.gif
8gb kit ah bro? trfc must be 160ns regardless 4/8gb...  wink.gif
*
no 4gb only... i think yes it is 160ns....
cllee86
post Apr 7 2011, 03:33 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
540 posts

Joined: Aug 2007


Latest RAM Timing.

8-9-8-23-30 @ 1.6v / FSB:DRAM = 3:10

MemTest pass 1 round. No error found.

Prime for 15 minutes. 2 sessions. Success.

Looks like OK. But is tight timing faster or slower? So far I'm quite satisfied with my current clock and configuration biggrin.gif
Do you think its possible to push 3.8Ghz with this RAM timing? Now running stable at 3.6Ghz nod.gif

Have modded my casing by adding another 12cm intake fan. Have to take out 3 DVD Bays to do that. Looks ugly but it works.
Temperature is lower by 8c thumbup.gif
shajack
post Apr 7 2011, 09:59 AM

semi-retired@everything
*****
Senior Member
872 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Kuala Lumpur(juz my body,LOl)


like cllee said,which is better...higher freq or tight timing?
dafreak
post Apr 7 2011, 10:04 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,064 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Star Stuff


QUOTE(shajack @ Apr 7 2011, 09:59 AM)
like cllee said,which is better...higher freq or tight timing?
*
obviously is both... smile.gif

superpi/hyperpi dont just depend on ram, still depend on other factors like cpu speed, nb speed

your rams may be overclocked, but may be bottlenecked by other factors above unless they are OC-ed as well
cloudwan
post Apr 7 2011, 10:08 AM

- Knob -
*******
Senior Member
8,523 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: The Jungle Of Pahang


QUOTE(dafreak @ Apr 7 2011, 10:04 AM)
obviously is both... smile.gif

superpi/hyperpi dont just depend on ram, still depend on other factors like cpu speed, nb speed

your rams may be overclocked, but may be bottlenecked by other factors above unless they are OC-ed as well
*
Not NB speed yo but cpu-nb speed smile.gif
dafreak
post Apr 7 2011, 10:45 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,064 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Star Stuff


QUOTE(cloudwan @ Apr 7 2011, 10:08 AM)
Not NB speed yo but cpu-nb speed smile.gif
*
cpuz show as NB speed mar tongue.gif laugh.gif

bios is as cloudwan says, cpu-nb speed
louislkw
post Apr 7 2011, 10:55 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
434 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: ^Newbie^


Why the AM3 MB can fit AM3+ CPU.. Pins configuration not from me but here..

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=s...-16625-1-1.html
cloudwan
post Apr 7 2011, 11:12 AM

- Knob -
*******
Senior Member
8,523 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: The Jungle Of Pahang


Wuhuuuuu then its true, pin config & holes are actually backward & forward compatible, yessssss smile.gif thumbup.gif
shajack
post Apr 7 2011, 11:34 AM

semi-retired@everything
*****
Senior Member
872 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Kuala Lumpur(juz my body,LOl)


thts nice to hear...then ill just wait for u guys to sell thuban at 1/10 its original price rclxms.gif tongue.gif drool.gif



This post has been edited by shajack: Apr 7 2011, 11:35 AM
shinjite
post Apr 7 2011, 11:43 AM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,320 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


Good news man....will go straight for Bulldozer with my AM3 board biggrin.gif
cllee86
post Apr 7 2011, 01:00 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
540 posts

Joined: Aug 2007


QUOTE(louislkw @ Apr 7 2011, 10:55 AM)
Why the AM3 MB can fit AM3+ CPU.. Pins configuration not from me but here..

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=s...-16625-1-1.html
*
QUOTE(cloudwan @ Apr 7 2011, 11:12 AM)
Wuhuuuuu then its true, pin config & holes are actually backward & forward compatible, yessssss smile.gif thumbup.gif
*
QUOTE(shinjite @ Apr 7 2011, 11:43 AM)
Good news man....will go straight for Bulldozer with my AM3 board biggrin.gif
*
Donno man. It looks like AM3+ has 940pins. AM3 has only 938.
Wikipedia says AM3+ CPU's are not compatible with AM3 socket cause of the extra 2 pins, if you trust Wikipedia.
Even the link provided by louislkw shows that AM3+ has extra 2 pins. Even though I can't really understand the English translation well.
louislkw
post Apr 7 2011, 01:28 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
434 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: ^Newbie^


Go back and take out ur mobo count the pin holes..
cllee86
post Apr 7 2011, 02:31 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
540 posts

Joined: Aug 2007


QUOTE(louislkw @ Apr 7 2011, 01:28 PM)
Go back and take out ur mobo count the pin holes..
*
Or I could read the manual or refer to official AMD statement...
cloudwan
post Apr 7 2011, 02:49 PM

- Knob -
*******
Senior Member
8,523 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: The Jungle Of Pahang


QUOTE(cllee86 @ Apr 7 2011, 02:31 PM)
Or I could read the manual or refer to official AMD statement...
*
Look at the pictures of the cpu pin from the link louislkw gave, even tho AM3 socket is 941pin but AM3 cpu is only 938pin yoo..
While AM3+ cpu has 940pin active, it could mean that those AM3 mobo's that manufacturer had electrically activate all 941pin on their socket may able to use AM3+ cpu..
There are basis to what some of these people claim, we just have to wait for official annoucement from AMD, hope it would be a good one just like bro louislkw mention thumbup.gif

123 Pages « < 99 100 101 102 103 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0300sec    0.62    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 05:59 PM