yesterday i went to Nikon Malaysia to get my 18-200 vr lense serviced with my D7000 and to my amazement, that's the first time they touched a D7000 hhehehehe
Photography Latest News Nikon D7000, Nikon
Photography Latest News Nikon D7000, Nikon
|
|
Nov 16 2010, 12:33 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,365 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
yesterday i went to Nikon Malaysia to get my 18-200 vr lense serviced with my D7000 and to my amazement, that's the first time they touched a D7000 hhehehehe
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 16 2010, 02:57 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
804 posts Joined: Sep 2006 |
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « thanks for the post bro, learned something there |
|
|
Nov 16 2010, 06:26 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
64 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Seri Kembangan |
QUOTE(adriancs @ Nov 16 2010, 11:09 AM) The 35/1.8 is a very good lens, of course if you factor in price, then the 50/1.8 is even better. If you're shooting in very, very low light (like inside a pub or dimly lit restaurant), nothing is going to help you save a D3/3s/700; and a fast f/1.4 like the 24/35/50/85mm f/1.4 lenses. Then you have to ask yourself, is it worth the expense? How many percent of keeper shots do you stand to gain vs. the investment of close to RM8k, if you chose the cheapest option of D700 & 50/1.4. And then there is the issue of too shallow depth of field. Can you accept sharp eyes and blurred noses? Or how about sharp noses and blurred eyes? If you rely on AF in dark places these things happen more often that we wish it would. And those piggy cameras are 2x the weight of your current one. Would you be happy hiking with it? And those lenses... even piggier (if there is such a superlative word) than the cameras. I had read ur message again and again..finally I got the message from you. Thanks for the advice. After reading the your message, I think I had decide to go for D7000, not for just higher ISO or watever..maybe Full HD video also another bonus for me..mm my birthday is just another 2 days..and I am ready to spend for this new D7000. thanks for your advice bro. Now look at "buying" higher ISO. Now, say for instance the D3000@ISO1600 is about the same as D7000@ISO6400. You don't want that much noise. Then you would still use the D7000 at 3200. Or less than that. Remember that ISO6400 is 2x the sensitivity of ISO3200. Imagine you have to pay 2x the price for an increase from ISO400 to ISO800. Would you still consider it? Doesn't sound very attractive anymore, right? Don't be fooled by the big numbers. Essentially you'd be paying more than two times the price of the D3000 just so that you gain one stop or at most 2 stops of light sensitivity. Where is the economy in that? That said, the D3000 and 35/1.8 I feel is more than sufficient for >90% of the situations you will be in. If there is not enough light, the answer is usually not having a faster lens, or having a higher ISO. The answer is to have more light. Maybe a bounced flash? Or if you're not shooting people, a tripod and slower shutter? Or if you're shooting people, perhaps you could move to somewhere with more light? Upgrading your body and lens is not the way to go. Changing how you shoot; where you shoot; and paying attention to your light sources, now that makes for better photos. Learn and know your camera's limits, and learn to work within them, thats the reward of photography. Of course, if money is no object, and a D7000 is pocket change, then by all means, buy it yesterday already. Oh yea, you bought it yesterday??? D7000? how much? where? I went to Fotokem, they selling RM3,999 (body). and Camworld selling RM3800(cash). IF buy with credit card, addition charge 4%!!!! too high!!! Please advice |
|
|
Nov 16 2010, 08:52 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
2 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
QUOTE(ccf1286 @ Nov 16 2010, 06:26 PM) I had read ur message again and again..finally I got the message from you. Thanks for the advice. After reading the your message, I think I had decide to go for D7000, not for just higher ISO or watever..maybe Full HD video also another bonus for me..mm my birthday is just another 2 days..and I am ready to spend for this new D7000. thanks for your advice bro. As long as you're buying it for the right reasons, then by all means get it. But don't buy it for the wrong reason and then be disappointed and poorer after that. I'm glad to help, you're welcome.Oh yea, you bought it yesterday??? D7000? how much? where? I went to Fotokem, they selling RM3,999 (body). and Camworld selling RM3800(cash). IF buy with credit card, addition charge 4%!!!! too high!!! Please advice Added on November 16, 2010, 8:58 pm » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « It does look like you have a front focus of about 1 to 2mm. But could you check with one or two more lenses? It could be the lenses that are calibrated wrong, not the body. Its not always the body that is front/back focusing. Also, check if the D7000 has a AF fine tune adjustment? If you can use that, then no need to send back. Save you the trouble... There is a tolerance in the AF calibration, and even if you do send back, they might correct it for this particular lens for you just to shut you up, but in the future you might have problems with other lenses as well. Be sure to make sure that its the body 100%. What I mean is that it might come back worse than it is now. This post has been edited by pr0nstar: Nov 16 2010, 08:58 PM |
|
|
Nov 17 2010, 01:31 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,333 posts Joined: May 2009 From: Denai Alam | Kota Damansara |TTDI |
QUOTE(pr0nstar @ Nov 16 2010, 08:52 PM) Added on November 16, 2010, 8:58 pm » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « It does look like you have a front focus of about 1 to 2mm. But could you check with one or two more lenses? It could be the lenses that are calibrated wrong, not the body. Its not always the body that is front/back focusing. Also, check if the D7000 has a AF fine tune adjustment? If you can use that, then no need to send back. Save you the trouble... There is a tolerance in the AF calibration, and even if you do send back, they might correct it for this particular lens for you just to shut you up, but in the future you might have problems with other lenses as well. Be sure to make sure that its the body 100%. What I mean is that it might come back worse than it is now. |
|
|
Nov 17 2010, 09:27 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,034 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 17 2010, 09:35 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
|
|
|
Nov 17 2010, 10:10 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,034 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
Haha, the black level and all were adjusted making it look under. Trying to make emphasize on the participants. Lighting really bad, making color too flat.
|
|
|
Nov 17 2010, 11:16 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
64 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Seri Kembangan |
haha...i think there is no right or wrong..nice or bad la...all depends on personal style...very subjective..
|
|
|
Nov 17 2010, 11:26 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Nov 17 2010, 01:31 AM) Thanks, I've went to Nikon today, they r all filled up with jobs till next Monday, I don't wanna leave my cam there, I oso found out that, my warranty card will be filled once sending in for warranty. Anyway they also told me that apart frm warranty, faster options is I can complain to the shop to replace me a new one, I've called, but unfortunately no stock. No waiting for them to stock in n exchange, I cant accept the fact to claim warranty with just 2 days old. Makes me really pissed off.... Told ya the warranty card need to fill up QUOTE(ccf1286 @ Nov 17 2010, 11:16 AM) haha...i think there is no right or wrong..nice or bad la...all depends on personal style...very subjective.. Did I said right or wrong ? nice or bad ? I just said under and I'm expecting more la |
|
|
Nov 17 2010, 11:48 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,333 posts Joined: May 2009 From: Denai Alam | Kota Damansara |TTDI |
Lemme share some of my first shot, my fren's super cute daughter
ISO 800 ![]() ISO 1600 ![]() ISO3200 ![]() Shot taken at Normal Quality JPEG, forgotten to change after Nikon reset them. Pic 2 & 3 resize to smaller This post has been edited by Kent3888: Nov 17 2010, 11:51 AM |
|
|
Nov 17 2010, 12:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,095 posts Joined: Apr 2010 From: Oggie Oggie Oggie!!! |
Nice bokeh / blur out around the little girl... Nice pic!!! Mind to share wat lens u using?
|
|
|
Nov 17 2010, 12:18 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,966 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: Macross Galaxy |
Should be 35mm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 17 2010, 01:22 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,034 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
Woolala, 3200 ISO is pretty much usable!
|
|
|
Nov 17 2010, 01:35 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(celciuz @ Nov 16 2010, 11:22 AM) Haven't been shooting at 6400 ISO on D7000, maybe tonight really give it a test run. Hehe, yesterday the owner didn't want to lemme use cause she was so busy shooting T_T. If you shot at dark room, the picture started become grainy around > 1000 iso. Now I know why dxomark stated 1100++ iso. You can see how bad it is by just zooming a little from the camera itself when reviewing the photo. QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Nov 17 2010, 11:48 AM) Lemme share some of my first shot, my fren's super cute daughter What's the aperture? When you zoom in the picture for ISO1600 and ISO3200, how's the noise like when preview from the camera (zoom in)?» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Shot taken at Normal Quality JPEG, forgotten to change after Nikon reset them. Pic 2 & 3 resize to smaller QUOTE(celciuz @ Nov 17 2010, 01:22 PM) Under sufficient lighting, it seems much more usable than insufficient or very low light... |
|
|
Nov 17 2010, 01:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,034 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
Andy214, high ISO and if your image underexposed you will see the noise for sure.
|
|
|
Nov 17 2010, 01:52 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
871 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Nov 17 2010, 11:48 AM) Lemme share some of my first shot, my fren's super cute daughter Very nice pics. And nice little girl too! Here's a small tip. Use your popup flash, set it to slow sync and -2EV to add a nice little reflection glow in the eyes. Makes the subject look more lively.» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Shot taken at Normal Quality JPEG, forgotten to change after Nikon reset them. Pic 2 & 3 resize to smaller This post has been edited by adriancs: Nov 17 2010, 01:53 PM |
|
|
Nov 17 2010, 01:56 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
Nov 17 2010, 02:24 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,333 posts Joined: May 2009 From: Denai Alam | Kota Damansara |TTDI |
QUOTE(Andy214 @ Nov 17 2010, 01:35 PM) If you shot at dark room, the picture started become grainy around > 1000 iso. Now I know why dxomark stated 1100++ iso. You can see how bad it is by just zooming a little from the camera itself when reviewing the photo. Shot at F2, lens is 35mm. The noise level is very low, I mean at iso 3200, looks like D5k iso 800, haven really tested yet....What's the aperture? When you zoom in the picture for ISO1600 and ISO3200, how's the noise like when preview from the camera (zoom in)? Under sufficient lighting, it seems much more usable than insufficient or very low light... QUOTE(adriancs @ Nov 17 2010, 01:52 PM) Very nice pics. And nice little girl too! Here's a small tip. Use your popup flash, set it to slow sync and -2EV to add a nice little reflection glow in the eyes. Makes the subject look more lively. I dont wanna flash coz I don wanna hurt the little girl and wanna take some natural(candid) pics of her not purposed portraits..... If the background has nice lighting den I will set it for slow sync =)Added on November 17, 2010, 2:26 pmOh ya, haha.... how to crop 100% using photoshop(I tried but cant find the 100% or 4R size crop for photo printing) or any other easy method? Btw my shots are at Normal JPEG and size priority compress set default by the cam. Forgot to change them after sending in my body for medical check up, they reset it. This post has been edited by Kent3888: Nov 17 2010, 02:29 PM |
|
|
Nov 17 2010, 02:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Nov 17 2010, 02:24 PM) Shot at F2, lens is 35mm. The noise level is very low, I mean at iso 3200, looks like D5k iso 800, haven really tested yet.... Yea, agreed! I've seen D5K sample pictures. I think the newer models improve more on the noise level, even the D3100.I dont wanna flash coz I don wanna hurt the little girl and wanna take some natural pics of her..... If the background has nice lighting den I will set it for slow sync =) Added on November 17, 2010, 2:26 pmOh ya, haha.... how to crop 100% using photoshop(I tried but cant find the 100% or 4R size crop for photo printing) or any other easy method? Btw my shots are at Normal JPEG and size priority compress set default by the cam. Forgot to change them after sending in my body for medical check up, they reset it. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0258sec
0.10
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 07:04 AM |