QUOTE(zstan @ Aug 19 2010, 02:18 PM)
yes, i agree to that.
but other religions rage war using their own religion as an excuse. but not buddhist.
Thats because other religions have control in place to prevent much dilution. With mutual exclusivity, it comes with exclusive claims. Others would be rejected. But that isn't the contention to wage war. Its hardly even enough.
wars waged were mostly similar as in most wars: for resource, for control of power, for safety of people, for land.
Some will claim for religious propagation, more more often than not, propagation of religion has always been there regardless of war. Its only when safety of these propagators were threatened, bullied by opposing forces, that war was considered when bilateral talks breaks down and human emotions goes off the charts.
There is no religion that said to wage war on others as a commandment to gain salvation.
Religion was used during war as a means to join people of different ideologies under a common ground. It makes joint ventures easier. But the war itself has its goals not on religion.