there is no difference between the two. real debates (not the ones here) tests your experience on a particular subject. If you slow down it means you intellectualize. Experience gives you knowledge and wisdom, debates verify that they are true and infalliable.

but of course the stuffs here arent debate, just childish trolling.

kuan yin is a disciple of a Buddha who is known of his/her great compassion towards all beings.

It's the same my friend. My muslim friend told me got christians group came to him and told him Allah in the Islam is the same as the Bible. THey use this as a trick to convert muslim.

u asked questions regarding a certain religion. but you expect a follower of a religion to know 100%. religion is life long learning. your answers make others assume you ask for the sake of downgrading their religion. when a certain question cannot be answered, you seek the answer from another person, or a Buddhist scholar or a buddhist guru.

Buddhists did not spark any religious war

Thats a semitic name. Arab and Hebrew shares the same root word, no?
Because the quran made claims against the bible, so christians counter this by what implying the same tactic.

Thats why religion itself is unethical.

well, because previously all these 'buddhists' shoot me gila gila said i know sikit dun confuse ppl.. so now i ask these ppl back lo, in that the case, enlighten me. furthermore this thread original name was Q&A about Buddhist religion. the OP ask us to ASK questions abt buddhist that we dont undersstand. I merely wanna understand more only.. furthermore did i shoot the person who replied me? i AM seeking answers from another person what... since here SO MANY ppl.. 1 ppl answer me 1 qs also enuf dy.. but i only see 1 person taking the effort to answer me which i appreciate that.

u Buddhists are so hypocrite.

Not in the name of buddhism, no.

Because its too diluted to have any significant impact. And because of its all-inclusive nature, everything becomes acceptable. But it never did prevent any war from occuring though. No buddhist nation had lived without any war.

problem is, I answer u that Buddhist can eat meat. Later u ask again. And ask again. Who want to answer u like that?
U troll say troll la. Pura-pura only.

people already answered u but u say too shallow.

what u want?

yes, i agree to that.

but other religions rage war using their own religion as an excuse. but not buddhist.

hmm what benefit do we get out of talking about the weakness of other people's religions?

he want to troll u guys...
obviously he is not happy with Christianity... so now trying to put down u guys...

neh.. zzzxtreme said if i dont get the answer from person A, i shud ask moar from person B ma.

so now person A answer i no und coz a bit shallow, so now i asking for person B lo.

nothing.

ask one question at a time will make things simpler

then lets not talk about their weaknesses okay

christians and muslims who read it will think that we are scoffing at them. bad impression to give people.

aiya.. but i dowan waste u guise time. just answer all my 15 answers and i will understand more and respect Buddhism liao. but i seriously no und the eat meat part. i always hear ppl said buddhists real 1 no eat meat... and now "someone" said monk can eat meat.
but why in tvb drama when a monk eat meat then is fake monk liao?

ffffffffffffffffffuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

If you dun trust us, why u ask? Some more, give you history lesson why monk eat vege. Now you said u confuse?

Come on la... tell us, what u want?

This post has been edited by gogo2: Aug 19 2010, 02:24 PM

when it's too obvious that you just want attention and that your answers can be resolved by just feeding google with the questions, how do you expect people to believe that you're sincerely asking for an answer and not trolling?