i heard Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB good review so i go C-Zone get one myself , havent test yet.
All About Harddisk Thread V3, Discussion for Good Harddisk
All About Harddisk Thread V3, Discussion for Good Harddisk
|
|
Jul 29 2010, 06:27 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,237 posts Joined: Sep 2006 |
i heard Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB good review so i go C-Zone get one myself , havent test yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 30 2010, 02:01 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,594 posts Joined: Apr 2010 |
|
|
|
Jul 30 2010, 02:49 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
919 posts Joined: Aug 2007 |
Any sifus can recommend a good external enclosure for F3? Budget under RM100.
|
|
|
Jul 30 2010, 03:20 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
|
|
|
Jul 30 2010, 03:44 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,008 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: T.T.D.I, Bukit Damansara |
QUOTE(win7 @ Jul 30 2010, 02:01 AM) That seems normal.QUOTE(5564321 @ Jul 30 2010, 02:49 AM) My earlier post:QUOTE(cannavaro @ Jul 24 2010, 05:30 AM) Nexstar CX (NST-300S2-BK) = RM 75 (LYN traders) |
|
|
Jul 30 2010, 10:02 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,320 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 30 2010, 11:47 AM
|
|
Elite
811 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Aemon's Field |
QUOTE(shinjite @ Jul 29 2010, 04:52 PM) So far in my dual 5-in-3 drive enclosure (80mm fan at the back, exhausting into case) that is stacked on top of each other, my drives are showing temps between 37C-43C. Drives are 1x WD Black, 4x WD Green in each enclosure. The Greens are RAIDed so when I access my RAIDed drive, all 8 Greens will run. So far so good, no heat issues. |
|
|
Jul 30 2010, 03:33 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
205 posts Joined: Jul 2010 |
Anyone heard of the WD black Scorpio? Launching soon or launched already i think
|
|
|
Jul 30 2010, 08:37 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,322 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Jul 30 2010, 08:50 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
587 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: In Front Of My PC |
is it true that there is a limit for a hardisk to be formatted.. means that if u formatted it a lot.. the disk will be useless mucchhhh more earlier than expected..
|
|
|
Jul 30 2010, 09:02 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
48 posts Joined: Feb 2010 |
hoow to and how long claim samsung hdd warranti?
|
|
|
Jul 30 2010, 11:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,039 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(boblp @ Jul 30 2010, 08:50 PM) is it true that there is a limit for a hardisk to be formatted.. means that if u formatted it a lot.. the disk will be useless mucchhhh more earlier than expected.. It should be a myth for normal hard disk. For SSD, if without TRIM, it will reduce wear level each format |
|
|
Jul 30 2010, 11:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
545 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: The Weirdo River O_o |
Bought the infamous WD Green 2TB 64mb .... then only saw this thread .... kaw .... alot bad story about this disk ... was planning to keep alot of "glory" into it ..... now torturing the drive by simply write in and out and read at the same time ..... tommorrow wake up and see how
----------------------------------------------------------------------- CrystalDiskMark 3.0 © 2007-2010 hiyohiyo Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- * MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s] Sequential Read : 121.293 MB/s Sequential Write : 119.564 MB/s Random Read 512KB : 40.285 MB/s Random Write 512KB : 67.669 MB/s Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 0.465 MB/s [ 113.5 IOPS] Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 1.170 MB/s [ 285.8 IOPS] Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 0.557 MB/s [ 136.0 IOPS] Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 1.172 MB/s [ 286.2 IOPS] Test : 1000 MB [F: 4.0% (73.8/1863.0 GB)] (x1) Date : 2010/07/30 23:48:07 OS : Windows 7 Enterprise Edition [6.1 Build 7600] (x86) ** The old WD Blue 160G 16mb does serve me well, 3 year dee still kicking ! This post has been edited by ahhann: Jul 30 2010, 11:48 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 31 2010, 01:37 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,256 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: Ampang TO Sibu |
|
|
|
Aug 1 2010, 11:24 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,447 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
juz bought 1.5tb Samsung hdd... HD154UI from C-zone Digital Mall yesterday night at Rm250
anyone using it nw ? its not SpinPoint 3 but how is the performance ? lol |
|
|
Aug 1 2010, 11:55 AM
|
|
Elite
811 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Aemon's Field |
Any of you running RAID-5 mind sharing what your transfer rates are, for comparison purposes?
I don't have much to compare yet, just a network-based file copy (since its a huge one, needs time to finish) I'm running 8x 2TB WD Green (WD20EARS) in RAID-5 on an Areca ARC-1222 controller (Win 7 HP 64-bit). LAN-based transfer over 1Gbps LAN from another PC, 4x 2TB WD Green (WD20EARS) in SPAN mode to the local RAID-5 array, using Windows file copy from mapped drive Total transfer size: 6.69TB (estimated total transfer time: 24 hours) - entirely video files in .avi, .mkv, and BD/DVD rip directories. Average transfer rate: 74.9MB/s (as measured after 2.18TB has been transferred) My NIC is showing I am using around 700Mbps of the LAN bandwidth, so not sure if the LAN is saturated (with the remainder used by the LAN overhead) or if the bottleneck is the RAID-5 write speed or the source SPAN array (my guess is that it's either the RAID-5 write speed or the LAN is saturated). Once this is completed, I will try some other combinations like WD Black -> RAID 5 (same computer) and then in reverse, to get a read-based transfer rate. |
|
|
Aug 1 2010, 11:58 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,039 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(steventan85 @ Aug 1 2010, 11:24 AM) juz bought 1.5tb Samsung hdd... HD154UI from C-zone Digital Mall yesterday night at Rm250 I do not have an F3anyone using it nw ? its not SpinPoint 3 but how is the performance ? lol These are HD154UI test result, a full partition that filled with 85.7% ----------------------------------------------------------------------- CrystalDiskMark 3.0 x64 © 2007-2010 hiyohiyo Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- * MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s] Sequential Read : 69.158 MB/s Sequential Write : 66.240 MB/s Random Read 512KB : 24.911 MB/s Random Write 512KB : 29.820 MB/s Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 0.296 MB/s [ 72.2 IOPS] Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 0.694 MB/s [ 169.5 IOPS] Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 0.452 MB/s [ 110.4 IOPS] Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 0.690 MB/s [ 168.6 IOPS] Test : 1000 MB [G: 85.7% (1197.3/1397.3 GB)] (x5) Date : 2010/08/01 11:55:58 OS : Windows 7 Ultimate Edition [6.1 Build 7600] (x64) Added on August 1, 2010, 12:10 pm QUOTE(Traveler @ Aug 1 2010, 11:55 AM) Any of you running RAID-5 mind sharing what your transfer rates are, for comparison purposes? Hi, you got a really nice Areca ARC-1222. may I know where do you buy it? A quick lookup it is hovering 400usd I don't have much to compare yet, just a network-based file copy (since its a huge one, needs time to finish) I'm running 8x 2TB WD Green (WD20EARS) in RAID-5 on an Areca ARC-1222 controller (Win 7 HP 64-bit). LAN-based transfer over 1Gbps LAN from another PC, 4x 2TB WD Green (WD20EARS) in SPAN mode to the local RAID-5 array, using Windows file copy from mapped drive Total transfer size: 6.69TB (estimated total transfer time: 24 hours) - entirely video files in .avi, .mkv, and BD/DVD rip directories. Average transfer rate: 74.9MB/s (as measured after 2.18TB has been transferred) My NIC is showing I am using around 700Mbps of the LAN bandwidth, so not sure if the LAN is saturated (with the remainder used by the LAN overhead) or if the bottleneck is the RAID-5 write speed or the source SPAN array (my guess is that it's either the RAID-5 write speed or the LAN is saturated). Once this is completed, I will try some other combinations like WD Black -> RAID 5 (same computer) and then in reverse, to get a read-based transfer rate. Getting 74.9MB/s is great. This post has been edited by mitodna: Aug 1 2010, 12:13 PM |
|
|
Aug 1 2010, 12:25 PM
|
|
Elite
811 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Aemon's Field |
QUOTE(mitodna @ Aug 1 2010, 11:58 AM) Hi, you got a really nice Areca ARC-1222. may I know where do you buy it? A quick lookup it is hovering 400usd I bought it at this out-of-the-way shop in Sim Lim Square (Singapore) - think it was TakNet, they cater mostly to businesses but I dropped by and they had a whole range of Areca and Promise RAID cards. I don't have the receipt here with me, but I remember paying around S$700 for it plus some accessory cables (before GST refund of $34).Getting 74.9MB/s is great. |
|
|
Aug 2 2010, 12:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
636 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: KL |
Guys... my HDD specs
![]() Is this okay ?? |
|
|
Aug 2 2010, 01:27 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,320 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
What HDD you running?
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0300sec
0.93
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 06:38 AM |