Now only u come ar? The super duper Alpha with Zeiss 16-35 swallowed me n my Canon Powershot d lor. Kakakakakakaka. Funniest entertainment I've had in a while. It's a bit cruel but it's absolute fun to bait ppl. N I was in the mood today n just cudn help myself.

you baru posted mah but what attracts me to comment there was his ridiculous claim and arrogance la.

he alpha user? LOL. k, makes it even more funny when people who proclaim the awesomeness of SSS suddenly say UWA needs more IS than Tele.

Alvin creating havoc =D

\

I generally ROFLOLMAO!!!!!

Will slap him a little after I finish work. LoL, We'll see whether he who is using 16-35mm f2.8 or me who is using 17 premium L knows whether UWA or TELE will benefit more from IS.

@ianho & @goldfries - you two are really sarcastic ah! hahaha

@viking - go ahead, see what you gonna shoot him kaw kaw

Distance scale? I thought you using 7D? how to look at distance scale on an EF lens anyway wor...all wrong...

On side note, since EF-S lenses are for APS-C only, does the distance scale actually work correctly?

So how is the focus after micro adjustment?

kesian that dude
shoot model till sot liao

eh ??? EF lens distance scale not accurate for crop body ??? so the infinity is not infinity ???

---

Added on June 14, 2010, 8:28 amall i can think of his logic is like this :

during model shooting,

use UWA, can see whole body, net stocking on white silky long leg, nice AXX covered with mini skirt..... .....ooo beh tahan, steam liao, heart pounding, sweating, hand shaking mah...

use tele lens usually shot upper half of the body and the face only, less distraction so can concentrate & less hand shake.....

AIYA, U GO SHOT MODEL WITH UWA THEN U KNOOOOOOW LAH


p/s : UWA is hand grapple distance, tele too far liao.
p/s2 : UWA usually shot at "odd" angle, such as from above (see boo) or from below (see ..... )

This post has been edited by BirdyFoto: Jun 14 2010, 08:34 AM

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
AHAHAHAHAH
ur morning joke is the funniest

you can use three body at once ah?

eh, my post where got sarcastic?

WAHAHAHAHAHAA!
Damn Nice reasoning!

Got an offer of RM 1350 for Tamron 17-50 non VC and RM 1850 for VC version. New unit.

Price OK?

wao. Price of non-VC unit dropped by RM 200 since the time I got it. The VC version price stayed basically the same.

Ah ha. Looks like a quite good price.
Does it by default comes with a hood?

local warranty or gray sets? price seems ok wor.... i found 2nd hand non-VC also need about 1k~1.1k liao~

this is funny man...

I thought the price of VC version already dropped?

Forgot about that part, oops. I think it is local warranty.