QUOTE(myjunk @ Jun 10 2010, 06:14 AM)
Ianho: don't want fight with you lah. There are times when j rather have the pic then no pic.
Fight what? I'm just saying the NR is not nice. Better have a bit of noise than make it clean but so soft.
QUOTE(deodorant @ Jun 10 2010, 09:26 AM)
Well, I
do know that body affects AF
speed a lot (thought was only accuracy that would be affected). That time TT in ikea using uncle fisherman's 1d3 + 28-300mm L, lightning fast AF. Put on my 500D, shooting similar things in similar conditions the AF was slow and sluggish

Yes the single shot response of the 1D is like greased lightning. It's terrifyingly quick. The response is just so quick, I dont even feel the half click then press shutter, while using the 1D. It's almost an instant, direct press of the shutter once u put the selected focus point on the subject. Just mash the button down n it shoots immediately.
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jun 10 2010, 07:37 AM)
Didn't know that body actually affect the sharpness of the picture so much. Thought a little only.
http://www.mauhorng.com/blog/canon-ef-70-2...s-usm-ii/#focalThat's what I always say oso but a lot of ppl dont believe it coz they never see with their own eyes. Most ppl believe the glass is most important. "Glass is most important" believe is outdated oredi. It only applies to film era. It was all about the glass n type of film used in those days. Dont like it, can change to more expensive film. In digital cameras, the sensor is stuck there so if u dont like it ur stuck with the body. It's like using cheap film n being stuck with it with no option to change to better film.
This post has been edited by ianho: Jun 10 2010, 11:01 AM