Canon EOS family V24, The White Knights
|
|
 Jun 9 2010, 11:36 PM
|
 
Junior Member
88 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Strawberry Island  
|
QUOTE(niwooe @ Jun 9 2010, 10:52 PM) Just got myself the Sigma 30mm, While I would've preferred the 35L, this little lens does wonders at one fifth of the price. Yeah show some pics?am a Happy owner now   Might to share how much you got it? |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 9 2010, 11:37 PM
|
 
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2  
|
QUOTE(myjunk @ Jun 9 2010, 11:12 PM) definitely more expensive than mine NEW QUOTE(lemon^and^strawberry @ Jun 9 2010, 11:36 PM) Yeah show some pics? I got my used full set with box like new condition Siggy 30mm f1.4 HSM for RM800. Might to share how much you got it?  |
|
|
Jun 9 2010, 11:40 PM
|
Senior Member
3,446 posts Joined: Jan 2007
|
Aiyo.. when you bought it was cheap man.. now lenses are $$ already mah..
|
|
|
Jun 9 2010, 11:41 PM
|
Junior Member
455 posts Joined: Nov 2006
|
how long was that viking? 800 is drop dead cheap!
|
|
|
Jun 9 2010, 11:50 PM
|
Senior Member
1,680 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Subang
|
yes viking thats is dirt cheap!
wanna sell yours that price to me?  |
|
|
Jun 9 2010, 11:52 PM
|
Senior Member
1,359 posts Joined: Mar 2008
|
@myjunk, downloading the LR3, gonna test out the NR later
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 9 2010, 11:56 PM
|
Senior Member
3,000 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: PeeJay
|
@myjunk..definitely some details are lost. but very minor details to fuss over.
Who views pictures at 100% anyway Do you need to play with the croma and luminance slider or there's auto mode? oh yeah..you want faster load times of pictures then you'll need SSD for the 0.1 ms seek time vs ~10 ms for RAID. btw..how can you get new for so cheap?!? |
|
|
Jun 9 2010, 11:58 PM
|
Senior Member
531 posts Joined: Mar 2010
|
Guess LR3 NR is good for portrait shot, if the facial texture too sharp, then pimple hole is a nuisance when 100% peep. such as this
 Uploaded with ImageShack.us |
|
|
Jun 10 2010, 12:04 AM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2
|
QUOTE(myjunk @ Jun 9 2010, 11:40 PM) Aiyo.. when you bought it was cheap man.. now lenses are $$ already mah.. QUOTE(niwooe @ Jun 9 2010, 11:41 PM) how long was that viking? 800 is drop dead cheap! QUOTE(Redcross @ Jun 9 2010, 11:50 PM) yes viking thats is dirt cheap! LOL, you know I won't. Sold it @ RM12xx. wanna sell yours that price to me? My best deal was my Canon 70-200mm f2.8 L USM. Got a used one for RM2k. Manyak shiok. |
|
|
Jun 10 2010, 12:05 AM
|
Senior Member
1,190 posts Joined: Dec 2008
|
Hey , does goldfries check this thread often ?
Just a thank you note to him for replying in my previous thread about the Sigma 24-70mm along with the others . Didn't know that there was a thread for that sorry . But the reason why I'm planning to get that lens is because the pictures I take needs to be slightly more zoomed in compared to 55mm.. So , is the Sigma 24-70mm f2.8 user friendly for a Canon EOS 450D ? |
|
|
Jun 10 2010, 12:07 AM
|
|
Junior Member
455 posts Joined: Nov 2006
|
Flickr was being gay tonight so it took me long to upload one photo (kept failing me)
  two samples shot wide open, guess which of it is the sigma and canon?  |
|
|
Jun 10 2010, 12:08 AM
|
|
Senior Member
1,359 posts Joined: Mar 2008
|
QUOTE(Decky @ Jun 10 2010, 12:05 AM) Hey , does goldfries check this thread often ? I found this word interesting. I think the lens is 100% user friendly, however, to master the lens, it is not really 100% easy imo.Just a thank you note to him for replying in my previous thread about the Sigma 24-70mm along with the others . Didn't know that there was a thread for that sorry . But the reason why I'm planning to get that lens is because the pictures I take needs to be slightly more zoomed in compared to 55mm.. So , is the Sigma 24-70mm f2.8 user friendly for a Canon EOS 450D ? » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « 1st canon 2nd siggy? This post has been edited by ginolo: Jun 10 2010, 12:13 AM |
|
|
Jun 10 2010, 12:10 AM
|
Junior Member
241 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Selangor
|
1st siggy 2nd canon
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 10 2010, 12:11 AM
|
|
Senior Member
1,190 posts Joined: Dec 2008
|
QUOTE(ginolo @ Jun 10 2010, 12:08 AM) I found this word interesting. I think the lens is 100% user friendly, however, to master the lens, it is not really 100% imo. Haha , I read in a review (more like heard) , that because this lens is heavy , it's more recommended to the higher end camera bodies..Added on June 10, 2010, 12:09 am 1st canon 2nd siggy? |
|
|
Jun 10 2010, 12:30 AM
|
VIP
15,705 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Tg. Rambutan
|
Myjunk, the noise reduction make the pics super soft oredi. I rather have some nice n sharp pics with some noise than such soft pics. Makes ur 135L look like lauya lens oredi lor the NR. The eyes all so soft no more kick
This post has been edited by ianho: Jun 10 2010, 01:52 AM |
|
|
Jun 10 2010, 12:38 AM
|
All Stars
14,242 posts Joined: Jul 2007 From: JAVABUS
|
QUOTE(niwooe @ Jun 10 2010, 01:07 AM) Flickr was being gay tonight so it took me long to upload one photo (kept failing me) u bought 30mm to home , so 1st is sigma » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « two samples shot wide open, guess which of it is the sigma and canon?  |
|
|
Jun 10 2010, 12:45 AM
|
Junior Member
156 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: Malaysia--Germany 
|
wish to have 1 DSLR...! sigh~
|
|
|
Jun 10 2010, 12:45 AM
|
|
Junior Member
455 posts Joined: Nov 2006
|
that was a smart answer
the 1st was a Siggie and the 2nd is the Canon 35L |
|
|
Jun 10 2010, 12:46 AM
|
|
Junior Member
241 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Selangor
|
niwoe.. wrong!
I just...... viewed you flickr pictures, and the 2nd picture isnt a new picture. Huahuahua |
|
|
Jun 10 2010, 12:49 AM
|
|
Junior Member
455 posts Joined: Nov 2006
|
well I said I only uploaded one photo
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0257sec
 0.73
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 04:38 PM |
Quote