Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
127 Pages « < 54 55 56 57 58 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Canon EOS family V24, The White Knights

views
     
weirdo88
post Jun 18 2010, 12:23 AM

me is noob =D
******
Senior Member
1,338 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: kuala lumpur


QUOTE(pengster @ Jun 18 2010, 12:22 AM)
Don't bother with the 18-55 IS's hood. It's so shallow, its useless. I use to have one last time, so I know. laugh.gif
*
yea...hood for 18-55 really not much difference..i have 1 tho=.=
pengster
post Jun 18 2010, 12:27 AM

eVoWei™
*******
Senior Member
7,757 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Subang




QUOTE(weirdo88 @ Jun 18 2010, 12:23 AM)
yea...hood for 18-55 really not much difference..i have 1 tho=.=
*
Yeah doesn't help much, if at all. I just got it for the sake of having a hood for my lens. laugh.gif
-kytz-
post Jun 18 2010, 12:31 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,573 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
QUOTE(pengster @ Jun 18 2010, 12:27 AM)
Yeah doesn't help much, if at all. I just got it for the sake of having a hood for my lens.  laugh.gif
*
Looks more pro izzit tongue.gif
Redcross
post Jun 18 2010, 12:31 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,680 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: Subang
To @Fruitie~

Tammy 17-50 RM1k? Mau tak? laugh.gif
http://www.photomalaysia.com/forums/showthread.php?t=128334
pengster
post Jun 18 2010, 12:34 AM

eVoWei™
*******
Senior Member
7,757 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Subang




QUOTE(-kytz- @ Jun 18 2010, 12:31 AM)
Looks more pro izzit tongue.gif
*
Wanted to see if it works in getting rid of flares when shooting under the sun. Turns out its useless laugh.gif

QUOTE(Redcross @ Jun 18 2010, 12:31 AM)
Wah good deal! thumbup.gif
weirdo88
post Jun 18 2010, 12:43 AM

me is noob =D
******
Senior Member
1,338 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: kuala lumpur


QUOTE(pengster @ Jun 18 2010, 12:27 AM)
Yeah doesn't help much, if at all. I just got it for the sake of having a hood for my lens.  laugh.gif
*
laugh.gif same here lol...just feel something missing if donhave 1 lol

QUOTE(-kytz- @ Jun 18 2010, 12:31 AM)
Looks more pro izzit tongue.gif
*
tongue.gif hood for 18-55 not much difference...lol maybe ppl don see u more pro..just to make urself feel mroe pro i guess biggrin.gif
AlexLee277
post Jun 18 2010, 01:25 AM

Dihujani kenangan masa lalu
*******
Senior Member
4,221 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: Somewhere on Earth



QUOTE(weirdo88 @ Jun 18 2010, 01:43 AM)
laugh.gif same here lol...just feel something missing if donhave 1 lol
tongue.gif hood for 18-55 not much difference...lol maybe ppl don see u more pro..just to make urself feel mroe pro i guess  biggrin.gif
*
at least it can protect your filter/lens... rclxms.gif last time i almost scratch my filter cause i'm using the cement wall for my stabilizer whistling.gif
mengsuan
post Jun 18 2010, 08:05 AM

9W2NNS
Group Icon
Staff
10,459 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Puchong

QUOTE(jesuck @ Jun 17 2010, 10:49 PM)
Heard people said 18-200 quality not good...
*
So many people thinks that superzoom like 18-200mm are poor. No, they are not. Sigma 18-200mm is capable of producing great images. Canon 18-200mm is even better. For the price that you're paying for Canon 18-200mm, the IQ is near to 17-40mm, just lack of L colour and the premium build quality.
BirdyFoto
post Jun 18 2010, 08:23 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
531 posts

Joined: Mar 2010


AFAIK, no current lens can be coined having poor IQ. Only can say better or worse comparatively.

18-200 IQ is good for beginner & non pixel peeper.

then again if 18-200 is sooo good, nobody will be replacing it with L lens rite ?

These are basic questions to ask yoself ......
Is your budget can take it ?
Is the zoom range long enough for the things you have in mind ?
Is it comfortable in yo hand ?? solid ? feel good ?

Lastly, just buy it, use it, not satisfy, time for upgrade ^^

GoodMorning
post Jun 18 2010, 09:09 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Dec 2004


QUOTE(AlexLee277 @ Jun 18 2010, 01:25 AM)
at least it can protect your filter/lens...  rclxms.gif last time i almost scratch my filter cause i'm using the cement wall for my stabilizer  whistling.gif
*
Agree here, it can protect ur lense and filter, and also keep the lenses surface clean as well. especially in crowded event, it save my lenses/filter b4..
samlee860407
post Jun 18 2010, 09:54 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,631 posts

Joined: Oct 2005


am i the only person don't like the looks of my lens with hood?

i really much prefer how it looks without hood lol, but for the sake of protection.....
DecaPix
post Jun 18 2010, 10:01 AM

5 star monkey
*******
Senior Member
3,000 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: PeeJay
depends on what lens la
some lens looks ugly with hood
ie 18-55
some looks cool
ie 70-200

azrinarizz
post Jun 18 2010, 10:14 AM

Made in Malaysia!
*******
Senior Member
2,448 posts

Joined: Jul 2008


QUOTE(DecaPix @ Jun 18 2010, 10:01 AM)
depends on what lens la
some lens looks ugly with hood
ie 18-55
some looks cool
ie 70-200
*
I use hood for all my lenses except my 18-55 because it serve n purpose tongue.gif
Had an incident where I hit my lenses against wall,tables,other cameras and so on
So with the hood, I feel more secure when I hit other cameras or even a wall
I rather spend 200 on another hood than fixing my lens which can cost me thousands laugh.gif
That is why my hood have scratch marks everywhere after 1 day of usage rclxms.gif
casadida
post Jun 18 2010, 12:04 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
59 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jun 17 2010, 11:21 PM)
the quality is fine. sometimes people don't put in proper perspective.

you can view my flickr so many taken with sigma 18-200, that also lower quality than Canon. look at my stock photo gallery, one of the photo was taken with sigma 18-200!!! if quality so bad, how it got accepted by critics more demanding than all of you combined? smile.gif

but anyway i think you're better off just stick to 18-55 IS. upgrade can be done later.
*
dear goldfries, i haven't gotten my canon 550 but planning to get it next weekend lar.
However, just my 2 cents. the problem is not starting out with 18-55 first or not.
i know it's cheaper and to learn with 18-55 but why i kept thinking about whether to get 18-200 first
is because when u get it with kit lens, it's relatively cheapker than buying it alone lor.
eg: 550 + 18-135 = RM3.5 / 500 + 18-200 = RM3.8 / 550 + 18-55 = 2.7
with body RM2.4k + 18-200 = around RM4.4k

so it basically comes back to the question of whether 'dai' or not 'dai'.
wanna be wise consumer mar.. budget only save around RM4k so wanna get the best deal lor.

just wanna ask you a question here, i heard that 18-135 and 18-200 actually the
zooming ain't that big a difference based on calculation.
so i'd rather get a kit II for 550d than kit II for 500 hor?
awyongcarl
post Jun 18 2010, 12:18 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,870 posts

Joined: Dec 2004


QUOTE(casadida @ Jun 18 2010, 12:04 PM)
dear goldfries, i haven't gotten my canon 550 but planning to get it next weekend lar.
However, just my 2 cents. the problem is not starting out with 18-55 first or not.
i know it's cheaper and to learn with 18-55 but why i kept thinking about whether to get 18-200 first
is because when u get it with kit lens, it's relatively cheapker than buying it alone lor.
eg: 550 + 18-135 = RM3.5 / 500 + 18-200 = RM3.8 / 550 + 18-55 = 2.7
with body RM2.4k + 18-200 = around RM4.4k

so it basically comes back to the question of whether 'dai' or not 'dai'.
wanna be wise consumer mar.. budget only save around RM4k so wanna get the best deal lor.

just wanna ask you a question here, i heard that 18-135 and 18-200 actually the
zooming ain't that big a difference based on calculation.
so i'd rather get a kit II for 550d than kit II for 500 hor?
*
200-135 = 65mm
65mm x 1.6 = 104mm in difference.

So, I did the calculation, what do you think?


IMO, the 18-200 is a very good lens, the build is quite solid, tad bit better than 18-135. (Though I've only handle that lens once on my friend's 7D)
vikingw2k
post Jun 18 2010, 12:18 PM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



QUOTE(casadida @ Jun 18 2010, 12:04 PM)
dear goldfries, i haven't gotten my canon 550 but planning to get it next weekend lar.
However, just my 2 cents. the problem is not starting out with 18-55 first or not.
i know it's cheaper and to learn with 18-55 but why i kept thinking about whether to get 18-200 first
is because when u get it with kit lens, it's relatively cheapker than buying it alone lor.
eg: 550 + 18-135 = RM3.5 / 500 + 18-200 = RM3.8 / 550 + 18-55 = 2.7
with body RM2.4k + 18-200 = around RM4.4k

so it basically comes back to the question of whether 'dai' or not 'dai'.
wanna be wise consumer mar.. budget only save around RM4k so wanna get the best deal lor.

just wanna ask you a question here, i heard that 18-135 and 18-200 actually the
zooming ain't that big a difference based on calculation.
so i'd rather get a kit II for 550d than kit II for 500 hor?
*
Best bang for ya buck? Get the following combo. Sweet for beginner.
- Canon EOS 550D + Canon 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 IS kitlens RM2700
- Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 - RM1300
- Canon EF 55-250mm f4-5.6 IS - RM8xx
- Canon EF 50mm f1.8 - RM300

Then sell your Canon 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 IS - RM300-400.

Total Damage - RM47xx.

You get to have a superb walkabout lens with constant aperture f2.8, also a telephoto lens which zooms up to 250mm(instead of 200mm compared to 18-200), also you get to have a portrait lens 50mm f1.8.

smile.gif
XiuKeong
post Jun 18 2010, 02:17 PM

[OMG] Sweetie™
*******
Senior Member
9,441 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: Oz




Anyone know where can get those cheap shutter timer ah? I saw Ebay got it but Rm50 hmm.gif
vikingw2k
post Jun 18 2010, 02:46 PM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



QUOTE(XiuKeong @ Jun 18 2010, 02:17 PM)
Anyone know where can get those cheap shutter timer ah? I saw Ebay got it but Rm50 hmm.gif
*
What function do you want? Plenty of remote shutters ranging from RM50-1000+.
XiuKeong
post Jun 18 2010, 03:06 PM

[OMG] Sweetie™
*******
Senior Member
9,441 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: Oz




QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jun 18 2010, 02:46 PM)
What function do you want? Plenty of remote shutters ranging from  RM50-1000+.
*
A simple one for time lapse tongue.gif

I saw someone using the remote that allow the user to set the time interval and also set how many shots to be taken.

This post has been edited by XiuKeong: Jun 18 2010, 03:06 PM
jobneed
post Jun 18 2010, 06:15 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: /k/


Is it okay if i use a normal canon 55mm lens with macro filter?

127 Pages « < 54 55 56 57 58 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0299sec    0.43    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 09:48 PM