From my M3 handbook, direct copy from handbook:


As a guide to the progression rules for Honours degree students, a flow chart is shown below. This should be taken as a guide only.



Re-assessment of failed modules will take place either in August/September or in the following academic year as an external re-sit. If you have a significant number of re-assessments then you should consider carefully when these are to be taken. The University regulations only allow one re-assessment attempt and so it may be in your interests to delay your re-sit examination until the next academic session.

It is important to note that if you have re-sits, for progression purposes, the better of the original and re-sit mark is used, but for calculating the degree classification the original mark is the one used even if it is a failed mark. This will also be the mark that appears on your final transcript. Therefore, it is in your interest to do your best at the very first attempt of any exam. In all cases both the original marks and those obtained on re-assessment are available to the Examiners’ Board.

If you are unable to progress to the next stage of an Honours degree then it may be possible for you to transfer to the next stage of an Ordinary Degree course. The figure below summarises the rules for progression onto the Ordinary Degree. For this degree, you take 100 credits per year (instead of the 120 for the Honours Degree) and the weighted average is calculated over the best 100 credits worth of marks.




Hope it helps.

This post has been edited by DJFoo000: Dec 29 2010, 05:46 PM

Thanks! Helped alot. Refer bolded part above, it's abit ambiguous. So printed on transcript is original mark, not resit mark? In China campus both are printed.

Nottingham University accept diploma holder in pharmacy?

I think it's negative if you are looking for 2nd year entry. Not sure if it qualifies for your 1st year entry or not. It's after all, the top course in this campus, also the only one that must be completed in the UK, imagine the quality control imposed.

ou....sad to hear that....actuali have to do diploma becoz of money matter..so now plan to continue degree,but money problem also....reali likes pharmacy very much

i think u should call up and ask the admission ppl.

As far as I know diploma in pharmacy holders are only eligible for entry into Bachelor of Pharmaceutical Science, I dont see anyone with diploma qualification got into Mpharm.

But I could be wrong. Do clarify with the student recruitment department. Its just a call away..xD

Happy 2011 everyone.

You fooled me for a second..

then here also u gonna get problem... pharmacy course have to finish final year in uk if i'm not mistaken...

yea...it's like a 2+2 program.first 2 yr in malaysia campus.3rd n 4th yr in uk campus.But,they are going to have a 4+0 program in 2011.

IS MONash foundation year accepeted to enter nottingham ?

Wow I never knew such thing like the M3 Handbook existed Damn

oh it was in U drive. Tutor mentioned to look at it so I did. And we noobs first time playing with central servers so simply clicked around. There were even raw JPG photos taken for promotional purposes (i think?) in the drive. Pretty spectacular.

Can someone kindly help me with the above question?

I'm new to this topic.

Not sure where I went wrong in the above, probably understanding of the basic idea is wrong?

Ahh the agony of MS Paint....

Btw, if there's no x in front of the e,
which means if it's directly 2e instead of 2xe,
then it would be quite straightforward and simple.

But in this case, not sure if I'm correct.

This post has been edited by entryman: Jan 2 2011, 06:19 PM

edit: removed double post.

This post has been edited by entryman: Jan 2 2011, 06:12 PM

If it's an integral of (AB), you cannot split into integral of A and integral of B. You can only do that if it's integral of (A+B).

That looks like integration-by-parts to me, can chain rule do the trick also?

EDIT: Yeah, it's the painful integration by part.

This post has been edited by tanjinjack: Jan 2 2011, 06:26 PM

Oh alright! So it's called integration by parts. I wonder why it's not in my book

Found this: http://www.math.hmc.edu/calculus/tutorials/int_by_parts/

Pretty close example to my question, but still don't understand..

Gotta try to learn it up later............

---

Added on January 2, 2011, 6:41 pmThanks tanjiinjack

This post has been edited by entryman: Jan 2 2011, 06:41 PM

When you saw an integral in a form of u(x).v'(x), sometimes you'll need to use integration by parts, sometimes substitution.
There are patterns for you to recognise. If u(x) is reducible, in a way that you can ultimately eliminate the x off by keep on differentiating, while v'(x) couldn't no matter how many times you differentiate (like e^x, sin x, cos x), then by parts will prove to be a very direct method to solve it.
So, in your problem, you need to choose 2x as your u(x), and the exponential stuff as your v'(x).
Write out your u(x) and v'(x), then derive your u'(x) and v(x).
Now, you should have 4 things, u(x), v(x), u'(x), v'(x).

Applying the formula: integral of (uv')= uv - integral of (u'v).
Then you should be able to solve it.

Note in the link you cite, it uses dv, while I use v'. They are same actually.

A bit extra, which might not be applicable.

TQ! Analysing and Practising.

That is definitely integration by parts. In this case 2x will be the 'u', while e^2x is the 'dv'. If I'm correct you won't need to integrate a second time.

Answer


The priority for which part is to be 'u' is as follows:
1) ln (x)
2) x
3) e^x or trigonometric function of x (sin x, cos x etc)

This post has been edited by DJFoo000: Jan 2 2011, 11:36 PM