QUOTE(rkg38 @ Dec 3 2010, 10:06 AM)
Maybe the meaning of "cheap" & "expensive" for ur friend is whether they can afford or not...
i agree with ur computation above, but that is at stage of invest...
but if look the time after the dividend...
example:
Invest RM1,000 @ NAV RM0.25
4000units @ cost RM 0.25 = RM1,000
NAV before the dividend pay out: RM0.30,
4000units @ RM0.30 = RM1200, unrealised gain was RM200.
let said dividend 2sen, NAV after dividend RM0.28 <<<assuming
4000units @ 0.02 = RM80 = 286 units
after dividend
4286units @ 0.28 = RM1,200
RM1000/4286 units = 0.2333
which means the cost per unit is reduced to RM0.2333 from RM0.25
and the NAV is at RM0.28 after the dividend...people compare RM0.28 & RM0.30, and have a chance to climb up to RM0.30 or higher...
this is what i understand...correct me if im wrong...
If you do the same calculation with a NAV of RM 25, it will be the same figure, as long as the percentage is the same.

The NAV makes no difference. The chance to climb higher is NOT affected by the dividend payment, it is based on the market. Basically dividen in UT is NOT an earning, it is merely a distribution. You are merely taking money from your left pocket and put in your right pocket, does that makes you feel richer?

Lets say your calculation above, You have invested RM 1000. If RM 0.02 dividend was paid (and reinvested & assume no tax) as you mentioned above, your total earning is now 4286 * 0.28 = RM 1,200 (20% earnings), and if dividend is not given then 4000 units*0.3 = RM 1,200 (20% earnings), can you tell me what is the difference? Is it because you have more units with cheaper value, you can feel better?

Again if the UT earnings rise by 10%, the UT price (after dividend) earning will be 0.28*110%= 0.308*4286 = RM 1320, if the UT did not distribute dividend then the UT price will be 0.3*110% = 0.33*4000 = RM 1320. Again no difference.
Don't be fooled by the agent's sweet talk.

Also if you noticed, dividend is taxable, hence you LOSE money. If no dividend is given you are not taxed.
This post has been edited by gark: Dec 3 2010, 11:19 AM