QUOTE(darkskies @ Jul 28 2010, 07:23 PM)
@Robertngo
Noone had even proof it wrong n "U" jumped into conclusion? Noone know? u think 500 yrs ago everyone are pratically idiot?
Yes superstition in western's view as i said.
And how can anyone prove it wrong? If they do, people like you back then, will just say they aren't the REAL Feng Shui masters. And heck, it's not just about the people 500 years ago, even today there are people who would believe something, even if you point out that it's wrong. case in point Feng Xui.
QUOTE(darkskies @ Jul 28 2010, 07:23 PM)
@TheDoer
Yea i've notice ur insert seems to be drowning u too . U think that i'm setting a trap for you but yet u feel that i'm preventing u from riding on your own school of knowledge frm googling and wiki on my statements.
I was being nice, I'd sooner think you've wilfully set a clever trap for me, then you have NO points to backup your claims,and in a desperate hope to win, point the finger back at your opponent.
This is what you said previously.
darkskies,Jul 28 2010, 09:21 AM
western way could nv understood or perhaps get close enough to see it. Even PHDs are unable to unravel the fact of this book.Name of the book called 易經 and it's been renamed this way in the modern days.
*DON'T slap me with your wiki fact.
This basis can never be applied through westerner's formula or theories. If u guys think that u could explain or judge through ur wikifacts/westerner's view then u are wrong.
So how do you expect us to continue googling to explain it to you? You've already said it's all wrong no matter what we google|wiki, naturally in order for us to continue the topic, you have to lay out why you say traditional chinese wisdom is true. Because I could eloquently point to you why it is wrong, and you'd just say it does not apply and that we do not know enough of it to argue; conveniently you failed to bring any supporting points to your case.
QUOTE(darkskies @ Jul 28 2010, 07:23 PM)
This is what western view about. To shut a statement down, logic/proof/evidence if not must be false.
That's the funniest thing to say. It's not a western view. Everybody does it in their daily lives. To say it does not, proves why people still believe in things that don't work.
Let me ask you, if I told you i've seen aliens landing on earth would you say it is true or false? Immediately you'd think "show me proof" am I right? If I can't present you the evidence, naturally you'd think I'm wrong. Isn't that right? Or do you start preparing for an extraterrestrial visit?
Are you saying that only in western courts need proof/evidence to prosecute someone?
If you're telling me that only westerners use this form of logic, then you've just made fun of our Traditional Chinese Wisdom. You're saying ancient chinese believe "
Anything".
QUOTE(darkskies @ Jul 28 2010, 07:23 PM)
To try to proof fengshui is equivalent to touching into religion matters. If u think religion is however superstitious shyt then go ahead with your western views.
You'd be surprised, Westerners are a religious lot. Even on the american bill it says in God we Trust. You're just going to shut off discussion, by saying it is in par, and having the same exclusive status as religion, and should not be questioned? That probably happen back then in China.
You're right, if someone believes in something, no matter what you tell them, they will continue believing in it. You can tell them, there's no ghost under your bed, but children will still be afraid. But when someone, does not recognize that something is an irrational belief and not a fact. Then that's a serious matter. We'd soon be seeing "In Feng Shui we trust" on our bills.
QUOTE(darkskies @ Jul 28 2010, 07:23 PM)
@TheDoer2again
Timelines proof nothing because "I-Ching" wasn't originally named that way. It's renamed shortly after what u googled up on.
Nope u didnt catch my phrase properly and u tried to twist what i speak and rewrote on your own understanding.
You see what I mean by trap? I was looking over and over again, why you said
darkskies,Jul 28 2010, 09:21 AM
*As i say don't slap out the history timeline because it's another ignorant thing to do. And that was the only thing I could find that was relevant. This is why you should state your views clearly. As I said, Hen asking Rooster to lay eggs.
QUOTE(darkskies @ Jul 28 2010, 07:23 PM)
To clear up your misunderstanding,
-I mentioned that it's serious for younger chinese generation not to know it and not ignorant*don't twist what i'm saying*
-If serious to u = ignorant on the dictionary then there's something wrong with your understanding.
Wah... Please look carefully at the quote that I replied to:
darkskies,Jul 28 2010, 09:21 AM
*As i say don't slap out the history timeline because it's another ignorant thing to do.You were the one who used the word.
Please look at the Definition of Ignorant
http://www.ask.com/web?qsrc=2990&o=0&l=dir&q=define+ignorant
ignorant - Definition [ĭǵnər-ənt]
(adj.) Lacking education or knowledge.
(adj.) Showing or arising from a lack of education or knowledge: an ignorant…
(adj.) Unaware or uninformed. I was not refering to you saying that "it's serious for younger chinese generation
not to know it " but still yes, that does mean they are ignorant, why are you finding fault with the word?
QUOTE(darkskies @ Jul 28 2010, 07:23 PM)
What's wrong with you ?
I was just about to ask you the same Question.
QUOTE(darkskies @ Jul 28 2010, 07:23 PM)
Ride on the google and wiki again?
Riding on your mystical I-Ching dragon again? ( I hate personal attacks... but you started it)
QUOTE(darkskies @ Jul 28 2010, 07:23 PM)
Is this open mind or u are wild bashing?
Ya, back at you.
QUOTE(darkskies @ Jul 28 2010, 07:23 PM)
Have they been proven wrong?
You've not given me anything to prove wrong. I just know that the whole claim on Feng Xui is bogus, because it's a bizarre claim that doesn't seem right. (see my alien's visit earth example)
The onus is on you to prove that it works, not others to prove that it does not work.
QUOTE(darkskies @ Jul 28 2010, 07:23 PM)
Of course it's wrong because they are applying the wrong formula.
Using the wrong formula to proof something is wrong of course will yield positive results that it is 100% wrong.
Ya sure, tell me what is the correct formula. I'm still waiting.
But then you do realise that logic is the same no matter what you apply it on (see my example above on how ppl are prosecuted in court)? You're formula have to counter what we currently know in order for it to prove it to work.
For example, the elixir of life contains poisons, such as arsenic, unless you can show us and prove to us that a certain ingredient in it can counter react the poison and make your life longer, then naturally who would drink it?
Likewise with Feng Shui, if it seems illogical, you have to use what ever I-Ching or chinese formula to prove that it works. Alas the formula has to be logical also.
This post has been edited by TheDoer: Jul 29 2010, 10:00 AM