Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
121 Pages « < 25 26 27 28 29 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Hardware Apple iPad Discussion Thread | V1, Everything about iPad

views
     
fyire
post Feb 2 2010, 11:26 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
VIP
9,270 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Somewhere out there
QUOTE(stringfellow @ Feb 2 2010, 11:18 AM)
Look, I did say OSX optimizations, and to elaborate further, optimizations that would be in place to take advantage to the fact that it is now touchscreen, and in tablet form. If Apple say they can do the iWork suite in touchscreen format, why cant the other suites? Logic Pro/Express is screaming for this, as well as touching up pictures on Aperture, or fixing timelines in Final Cut Pro/Express. While you're out of the office or offsite, simpler forms of manipulations of the controls on these apps can be done on the tablet, and once you get back to the office, docking it back with the Mac Pro, you can you the tablet itself as HID for the fullblown version on its big brother.
In regards to the Pro Apps, ever tried running any of them on a Macbook White?

QUOTE(stringfellow @ Feb 2 2010, 11:18 AM)
The key here is optimization, or if you wanna go one step further, a whole new UI for Mac OS X. Think of it as a layering over the underpinings of the actual OS X, just like how HTC skins the WinMo with its Sense UI. Similar horrified looks and expressions were seen when the mouse was introduced, and look where we are now. The time is ripe to move on to touch-based UI.

The current implementation of what's available to produce a semblance of a touch-based input UI is exactly as what wei says "not exactly something that will be of much use on your desk or on your hands". But with such aggresive approach and audienced receptive acceptance for the already excellent touch-based interfaces on the currently available iPhones, and iPod touches, why not take this gathered momentum and move ahead further while "the food on the plate is still warm"?

EDIt: I'd love to stay and chat, but all my bags are packed and I'm ready to go. Yup, leaving on a jet plane. Hey, that's the lyric of that song innit? tongue.gif
*
Oh yes, optimizations, you've finally gotten the picture here. How much stripping down do you need to do anyways from a full desktop app? For something like this, its actually easier to start from something basic and build up from there, rather than take something big to strip down.

Let's face it shall we, even if you're to strip down from a desktop app, you're still bound to get complaints. What more to say when they have to strip out something else later? Even more complaints?


Added on February 2, 2010, 11:28 am
QUOTE(jiidaineko @ Feb 2 2010, 11:17 AM)
honestly i couldnt picture what you have in mind. as long as the camera work/activated only at ONE direction/orientation, it should work just fine.
Of which pretty much defeats the multi orientation capabilities of the device already. Besides, ever thought of what happens when you need to fit more than 1 person into a video chat session on a screen with portrait orientation? squeeze squeeze squeeze (on the human side)

QUOTE(jiidaineko @ Feb 2 2010, 11:17 AM)
that is why when you want to use it, you dont block it? why activate a camera and block the lens? o_O furthermore who on earth rotates it over and over again WHILE USING a camera.
tried using the iPod nano with the camera? Sure, nobody would want to block the lens on purpose, but the form factor does cause this to happen a lot by accident to the point that it gets annoying.

This post has been edited by fyire: Feb 2 2010, 11:28 AM
rushmode
post Feb 2 2010, 11:28 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
221 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(cRazYee @ Feb 2 2010, 11:02 AM)
dont be stupid or sacristies, compare to half life or crysis, typical geek!
graphic engine is graphic engine, you can implement it in a mobile OS, that is the big deal! the quality is as part to PS2 as right now. You're pathetic
he replying to the post on how netbook cant play opengl games but A4 is powerful enough to play it. 3D games can be played on most netbook (even with GMA950 on low settings) so he's argument whether the A4 proc can play those games is valid because the other poster claimed it can.

QUOTE
by the hardware iPad has, load OSX will be probably pain in the ass
it mean for instant performance, instant boot up everything....
*
never meant OSX should be put in the iPad with the current spec.. just that apple can do much better job implement better hardware to iPad to run OSX but the refuse because probably:

1. want to get as high profit margin as possible with the price their suggested which is almost as high as the highest spec notebook (alienware gaming netbook)
2. keep it until the 2nd or 3rd gen so they can generate money that way because let face it.. apple WILL replace the 1st gen iPad in very short time ala iphone.


stringfellow
post Feb 2 2010, 11:30 AM

Ultrawide | 4K | VR
********
Senior Member
11,305 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE
by the hardware iPad has, load OSX will be probably pain in the ass
it mean for instant performance, instant boot up everything....


Probably true, but what is stopping Apple from producing a Modbook version for themselves, and still have that "instant performance, instant boot up everything"?

Please don't get me wrong, for the A4+iPhone Os, that would be best, but there is an equally large number of people who are as interested on the portability of the tablet form, but with significantly more power than what's offered by the A4+iPhone OS combo.

I don't see people complaining about the thickness of the current Macbook Pro, and losing that keyboard in favor of a touch-based interface would make it even thinner than it is now. What is stopping this form factor/spec? You might say the touch-based UI is not yet in place in OSX but, then again, all this while, all your Macbooks were never a touchscreen anyway, why would Apple place a touch feature on a hardware that does not support it? Introduce the tablet, and in tandem, introduce the accompanying touchscreen UI that would complement that form factor.
jphlau
post Feb 2 2010, 11:33 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,202 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
QUOTE(rushmode @ Feb 2 2010, 11:28 AM)

never meant OSX should be put in the iPad with the current spec.. just that apple can do much better job implement better hardware to iPad to run OSX but the refuse because probably:

1. want to get as high profit margin as possible with the price their suggested which is almost as high as the highest spec notebook (alienware gaming netbook)
2. keep it until the 2nd or 3rd gen so they can generate money that way because let face it.. apple WILL replace the 1st gen iPad in very short time ala iphone.
*
the ipad will not be able to run osx, even with better hardware because the ipad will got too hot for normal use. Even now, i cannot even tahan the heat when puting my mbp on my lap.

and they want to earn more money from their apps store.
fyire
post Feb 2 2010, 11:34 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
VIP
9,270 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Somewhere out there
QUOTE(stringfellow @ Feb 2 2010, 11:30 AM)
Probably true, but what is stopping Apple from producing a Modbook version for themselves, and still have that "instant performance, instant boot up everything"?

Please don't get me wrong, for the A4+iPhone Os, that would be best, but there is an equally large number of people who are as interested on the portability of the tablet form, but with significantly more power than what's offered by the A4+iPhone OS combo.

I don't see people complaining about the thickness of the current Macbook Pro, and losing that keyboard in favor of a touch-based interface would make it even thinner than it is now. What is stopping this form factor/spec? You might say the touch-based UI is not yet in place in OSX but, then again, all this while, all your Macbooks were never a touchscreen anyway, why would Apple place a touch feature on a hardware that does not support it? Introduce the tablet, and in tandem, introduce the accompanying touchscreen UI that would complement that form factor.
*
With thickness comes weight. and keep in mind that the weight is indeed a constraint, considering that this is a device meant to be held in a single hand on the edges only. But seriously, try it out for yourself. Try holding a macbook air (with a closed lid) the same way a tablet is to be held, and see how long before your wrist gets sore.
stringfellow
post Feb 2 2010, 11:34 AM

Ultrawide | 4K | VR
********
Senior Member
11,305 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
God I really need to go!

QUOTE
Oh yes, optimizations, you've finally gotten the picture here. How much stripping down do you need to do anyways from a full desktop app? For something like this, its actually easier to start from something basic and build up from there, rather than take something big to strip down.

Let's face it shall we, even if you're to strip down from a desktop app, you're still bound to get complaints. What more to say when they have to strip out something else later? Even more complaints?


Then build it from the base up. Just don't skimp on the specs, Apple. Knowing Apple, they aren't a strip-down kind of people, they move up. Take advantage on this momentum. The expected initial aversion towards a new way of interfacing with your applications on your hardware will always be there, and people will always whine because having to learn new things and leave the old ways behind, but they will begrudgingly follow through and in no time, it will be second nature to them.



fyire
post Feb 2 2010, 11:36 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
VIP
9,270 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Somewhere out there
QUOTE(stringfellow @ Feb 2 2010, 11:34 AM)
God I really need to go!
Then build it from the base up. Just don't skimp on the specs, Apple. Knowing Apple, they aren't a strip-down kind of people, they move up. Take advantage on this momentum. The expected initial aversion towards a new way of interfacing with your applications on your hardware will always be there, and people will always whine because having to learn new things and leave the old ways behind, but they will begrudgingly follow through and in no time, it will be second nature to them.
*
Tada! and that's what they did too. Take the iPhone OS as a base and build it up from there.

Dude, do you realize that you just debunked your own arguments here?
stringfellow
post Feb 2 2010, 11:39 AM

Ultrawide | 4K | VR
********
Senior Member
11,305 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(fyire @ Feb 2 2010, 11:34 AM)
With thickness comes weight. and keep in mind that the weight is indeed a constraint, considering that this is a device meant to be held in a single hand on the edges only. But seriously, try it out for yourself. Try holding a macbook air (with a closed lid) the same way a tablet is to be held, and see how long before your wrist gets sore.
*
Remove the keyboard. Remove the touchpad. Remove unnecessary components. It's already moving in that direction with the Macbook-->Air. Carbon fibre the shell. There lots of other ways to do it, and Apple's more than bullish than trying new engineering feats and unorthodox production methods.

Seriously, what is stopping Apple from putting a CULV processor instead of the A4, maintain the storage capacity SSD chips, while still maintaining the iPad form factor, or making it slightly thicker for cooling purposes?
fyire
post Feb 2 2010, 11:44 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
VIP
9,270 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Somewhere out there
QUOTE(stringfellow @ Feb 2 2010, 11:39 AM)
Remove the keyboard. Remove the touchpad. Remove unnecessary components. It's already moving in that direction with the Macbook-->Air. Carbon fibre the shell. There lots of other ways to do it, and Apple's more than bullish than trying new engineering feats and unorthodox production methods.

Seriously, what is stopping Apple from putting a CULV processor instead of the A4, maintain the storage capacity SSD chips, while still maintaining the iPad form factor, or making it slightly thicker for cooling purposes?
*
Let's see now, the first thing that comes to mind will be the cost? The moment you've have the cost go above the price of the macbook white for any of the models, you're in for a world of pain when it comes to marketing.
calvin_ng
post Feb 2 2010, 12:08 PM

TeamCity | HCC | Insighters
******
Senior Member
1,583 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: KEPONG



To apple it is plain simple why create a product to kill your own product... say a iPad with OSX can certainly kill a Mac Book Air...

they don't want that...

Secondly yes OSX can optimixe to use on touchpad say iPad... would you use it... generally the OSX was design from ground up to be a Operating system (OS) with no touch screen optimization...

yes they can modify to have it touch screen compatible... but then again why... it is not going to be 100% perfect... because it is simple OSX is not design for touch screen... it can be done but it is not friendly...

OS3 for iphone is made with ground up to be a touch screen OS... you cannot use OS3 to be a full fledge OS imagene OS3 on a Macbook hahaha or imac Wahahaha!!!! it does not work...

so why OS3 on iPad... simple iPad is design for touch screen interface and logically a touch screen software is the only logical to go with it...

that is why iPhone is such a success over the other smart phone.. it is because the OS is optimize for touch screen... yeah loving it too smile.gif
Others OS tried to duplicate the success by tweaking their OS and such.. but they cannot beat iPhone... so simple when a OS is not design to use it then don't...
nawzi
post Feb 2 2010, 12:47 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
156 posts

Joined: May 2009
From: KL>Sydney


QUOTE(xenohawk @ Feb 2 2010, 10:39 AM)
OMG.. Malu only..

"Putrajaya and Komtar are claiming that the iPad, due to its position as a product in between the iPhone and the MacBook, is mimicking the 1 Malaysia and Middle Malaysia concepts, respectively."

http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.p...copying-patents
*
shakehead.gif shakehead.gif shakehead.gif shakehead.gif shakehead.gif
So many things you (PM) can do with your citizen, now you want make some noise the things you not even sure what it is....

calvin_ng
post Feb 2 2010, 01:30 PM

TeamCity | HCC | Insighters
******
Senior Member
1,583 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: KEPONG



QUOTE(nawzi @ Feb 2 2010, 12:47 PM)
shakehead.gif  shakehead.gif  shakehead.gif  shakehead.gif  shakehead.gif
So many things you (PM) can do with your citizen, now you want make some noise the things you not even sure what it is....
*
malu nya...

Insted focusing on KPI they wanted to sue hahaha
no hope laaa seriously...

lin00b
post Feb 2 2010, 02:21 PM

nobody
*******
Senior Member
3,592 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
QUOTE(calvin_ng @ Feb 2 2010, 01:30 PM)
malu nya...

Insted focusing on KPI they wanted to sue hahaha
no hope laaa seriously...
*
its joke article la...... read 1st, lol
stringfellow
post Feb 2 2010, 02:39 PM

Ultrawide | 4K | VR
********
Senior Member
11,305 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(fyire @ Feb 2 2010, 11:44 AM)
Let's see now, the first thing that comes to mind will be the cost? The moment you've have the cost go above the price of the macbook white for any of the models, you're in for a world of pain when it comes to marketing.
*
Easy. Market is as how they're marketing the segmentation of their current MB/MBP/MBA right now. Majority will pick the iPad which those with specific needs will have the option of getting the more specced up tablet. But the again you'll bring up the streamlining of lineup argument again, so.....

Really gotta go. The plane's here.
calvin_ng
post Feb 2 2010, 03:31 PM

TeamCity | HCC | Insighters
******
Senior Member
1,583 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: KEPONG



That is what apple just did
let's say we have MacBook-MacBook air- MacBook pro
now we have
ipod touch - iPhone - iPad

yay it rimes Wala complete hahahaha

by the way if you are femiliar with apple key business that's is the way to go haha
they are focusing on online stores now hahaha hell they made alot of profit from there

Edoras
post Feb 2 2010, 03:37 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,134 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
talking about profit, wow...take a look at this!!

http://www.telecomasia.net/content/ipad-te...t-208-each-unit

SUShappyfamily
post Feb 2 2010, 04:48 PM

piak!
*****
Senior Member
804 posts

Joined: Jun 2009



10 Reasons Why Apple iPad'sonna fail

And this is according to gadgetophilia. Whilst the dust settles on Apple's recently announced iPad, it seems the hype has died down and everyone has an opinion on Apple's latest creation. In short, there is nothing that deserved the hype and the device simply sucks if said politely. Here are some reasons why this device fails:

1. No Multitasking
Do you know that if you concentrate on only one thing at a time, you can do that more efficiently than otherwise. Apple has come out with its own way to teach us that old proverb. No multitasking on iPad. Come on Apple! We want to listen to music when browsing the net or we want to download some files while we are watching a video. Earlier I said that we have little or no use of multitasking on a mobile phone due to its limited screen size but this is certainly not true for a device that is trying to replace a full fledged laptop or netbook.

2. Uncomfortable Keyboard
This was quite obvious that the iPad would have a virtual keyboard because there is no space for an actual hardware keyboard. And those who have used virtual keyboard, know that typing even an e-mail on it may be a headache and if you are a blogger or just a professional who have to type for a few hours, this is simply not the device for you. From the pictures available on the net, if you thought that you can just put the device on the table and type on the virtual keyboard like a normal keyboard, soon you'll find it impossible as the device's back is not perfectly flat and it kind of wobbles when you put it on a flat surface. This makes the virtual keyboard more difficult to use. However, you can connect a Bluetooth keyboard to the device and continue typing comfortably but then I have to say that you can also add two more wheels to your existing two wheeler to ride it like a car!

3. No WebCam
Yesterday I posted that the device should at least have an WebCam that will allow us to conduct video chat over a high speed internet connection. But Apple, with their infinite wisdom has decided that they can allow VoIP calls over 3G. We are very very pleased that you have given us your kind privilege to use the service. Oh! Apple is so generous! A cheap $400 Asus Eee PC Netbook can do VoIP or Video Chat through its WebCam but those devices are cheap anyway and Apple is obviously the synonym of glamor.

4. No Flash Support
Even if the standard smartphones have the flash support built-in their browsers nowadays, neither iPhone nor the iPod has the Flash support. And now, iPad also comes without the Flash support. The lack of Flash support in those tiny display browsers were pardonable but in a device that is going to be competing with the full fledged netbooks/laptops, this is going mean a deal breaker for many. Even the casual internet users won't forgive those gaping holes in the webpage which were supposed to be making the website more colorful. And also, forget about streaming video on webpage!

5. Ugly Adapters
You need to connect any device to the iPad? You just need to have the adapter for that device. Oh! We are so glad that we can at least connect our devices to it! Thank you Apple for your generosity to us. History will remember this.

6. Go to Apple Store for Apps
iPad can only run apps from the Apple App Store. No other Apps shall be entertained. Period.

7. No HDMI
Want to watch those nice HD Videos in your big HDTV screen when your iPad screen seems too small? No there is no HDMI to view the HD videos you've just downloaded from iTunes. And it is a sin that you thought the Apple iPad would connect to some Samsung HDTV. You shouldn't expect that Apple will allow follow any standard interface. They'll rather create an interface of their own!

8. Battery
We carry a spare wheel with our car. The Car can go flat. I will then replace that with my spare wheel. But forget this simple things with Apple. Touch their battery and void the warranty. They list that the battery life will last for 10 hours but I doubt if it will run for any longer than six hours. This is too low especially if we keep in mind that some netbooks(=computers) are now able to reach the 10 hour mark.

9. MicroSIM
Did anyone know that such term existed before Apple declared it? Well, I guess not. The device is supposed to be unlocked and you can use any carrier with it but currently, the SIM is only available from AT&T. Therefore, don't expect to run it on any cheap T-Mobile plans because they don't have the SIM. Do you know any other carrier that uses this SIM? The answer is apparently, Ahem, No.

10. Too Big Bezel
Don't you also think that the Bezel is too big to be called a decent one?


Voxe
post Feb 2 2010, 05:12 PM

Daft Punker
*****
Senior Member
815 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: Petaling Jaya
QUOTE(happyfamily @ Feb 2 2010, 04:48 PM)
10 Reasons Why Apple iPad'sonna fail

And this is according to gadgetophilia. Whilst the dust settles on Apple's recently announced iPad, it seems the hype has died down and everyone has an opinion on Apple's latest creation. In short, there is nothing that deserved the hype and the device simply sucks if said politely. Here are some reasons why this device fails:

1. No Multitasking
2. Uncomfortable Keyboard
3. No WebCam
4. No Flash Support
5. Ugly Adapters
6. Go to Apple Store for Apps
7. No HDMI
8. Battery
9. MicroSIM
10. Too Big Bezel
*
The ones I bolded are the ones I think the casual consumers won't really care when they buy the iPad.
calvin_ng
post Feb 2 2010, 05:57 PM

TeamCity | HCC | Insighters
******
Senior Member
1,583 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: KEPONG



I don't mind hahahaha kekekeke
Voxe
post Feb 2 2010, 07:20 PM

Daft Punker
*****
Senior Member
815 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: Petaling Jaya
Ha, fyire! iPad might get a camera afterall...

http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/02/apple-i...pruder-edition/

121 Pages « < 25 26 27 28 29 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0295sec    0.10    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 04:51 AM