Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Hardware GPU discussion

views
     
-kytz-
post Jan 6 2011, 10:58 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,573 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
How big of a difference between a GT540m and my HD4670? hmm.gif

Haven't been in the Mobile Computing scene for ages already doh.gif
sheahann
post Jan 9 2011, 03:58 PM

Crashing like a tidal wave..
*******
Senior Member
2,263 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: i-city

anyone know between
ATI Mobility Radeon HD5470 1GB 64Bit -

and

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 6370M 512MB 128bit

which 1 better ? thanks

Mr.Docter
post Jan 11 2011, 04:41 AM

Doctorpreneurs
*******
Senior Member
5,367 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



i dont understand something.

why the rating of world best mobility GPU are like this:

1st - NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M SLI
2nd -NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI

hmm.gif
SUSsoundsyst64
post Jan 13 2011, 03:20 PM

I'm No-Longer-Noobs
*******
Senior Member
3,725 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: In /hardware/

nvidia graphic numbers really confuse me. sleep.gif
christcwl9
post Jan 13 2011, 05:40 PM

^ Engineer ^
Group Icon
Moderator
2,772 posts

Joined: Apr 2009



Nvidia GT540M vs ATI 5730HD ??
Mr.Docter
post Jan 13 2011, 07:40 PM

Doctorpreneurs
*******
Senior Member
5,367 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(soundsyst64 @ Jan 13 2011, 03:20 PM)
nvidia graphic numbers really confuse me. sleep.gif
*
so does ATi nowadays. both are roughly the same sleep.gif
SUSsoundsyst64
post Jan 13 2011, 09:31 PM

I'm No-Longer-Noobs
*******
Senior Member
3,725 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: In /hardware/

QUOTE(Mr.Docter @ Jan 13 2011, 07:40 PM)
so does ATi nowadays. both are roughly the same sleep.gif
*
i'm okay with ati since i'm familiar with the product (for desktop) bot confuse for mobile version. sad.gif

hard to make choices which laptop with good graphics i should take
Trance4eva
post Jan 14 2011, 10:40 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,801 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
hey guys I need some help here
I need a laptop that can run 3Dmax, Autocad, Ilustrator, CS5, etc smoothly
my budget only around RM3k++....any recommendation????

oh yea, and what should i look at for a good laptop for graphic design??? CPU???, GPU????, RAM???????
Yung_Psyke
post Jan 15 2011, 02:02 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
286 posts

Joined: Dec 2010


Just played Left 4 Dead on Intel HD graphics,Core i3 370M on my HP G42 laptop,

got a stable 30-40 FPS average with all settings medium and 1024x768 res,

Not bad for an intergrated graphics,will test just cause 2 after this
AlexLai
post Jan 16 2011, 03:23 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,531 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
From: Kajang, Selangor



QUOTE(Mr.Docter @ Jan 11 2011, 04:41 AM)
i dont understand something.

why the rating of world best mobility GPU are like this:

1st - NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M SLI     
2nd -NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI

hmm.gif
*
Me thinks it's rated based on Vantage. GTX470M SLI scored higher.
ALeUNe
post Jan 16 2011, 04:10 PM

I'm the purebred with aristocratic pedigree
Group Icon
VIP
9,692 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mongrel Isle
QUOTE(Mr.Docter @ Jan 11 2011, 04:41 AM)
i dont understand something.

why the rating of world best mobility GPU are like this:

1st - NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M SLI     
2nd -NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI

hmm.gif
*
QUOTE(AlexLai @ Jan 16 2011, 03:23 PM)
Me thinks it's rated based on Vantage. GTX470M SLI scored higher.
*
GTX470/485 has a newer GF104 core.
GTX 480 is based on an old core GF100.

It is just like Wolfdale and Allendale of Intel.
Newer core, better.

New GF104 core has better performance as well as more efficient SLI scaling.
(It is also a known fact that GTX460 for desktop, based on GF104 core, has excellent SLI scaling).
twofivekid
post Jan 16 2011, 10:47 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
28 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
How big is the difference between geforce gt540m and geforce gt 550M. Is it big enough to be significant and worth adding about rm400-500 upgrading from 540m to 550m
dagnarus
post Jan 17 2011, 11:10 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
328 posts

Joined: Jul 2008


was reading about the latest intel integrated gfx intel 3000... this one is almost on par with geforce gt330!

bloody hell....

no need to buy laptop with dedicated gfx to play some of the mainstream game anymore!
ALeUNe
post Jan 18 2011, 12:22 PM

I'm the purebred with aristocratic pedigree
Group Icon
VIP
9,692 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mongrel Isle
QUOTE(dagnarus @ Jan 17 2011, 11:10 PM)
was reading about the latest intel integrated gfx intel 3000... this one is almost on par with geforce gt330!

bloody hell....

no need to buy laptop with dedicated gfx to play some of the mainstream game anymore!
*
What talking you?
nVidia Geforce GT330 has the score of 7200+ in 3DMark06.
SB GPU has the score of 4400+ in 3DMark06.
dagnarus
post Jan 18 2011, 01:16 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
328 posts

Joined: Jul 2008


QUOTE(ALeUNe @ Jan 18 2011, 12:22 PM)
What talking you?
nVidia Geforce GT330 has the score of 7200+ in 3DMark06.
SB GPU has the score of 4400+ in 3DMark06.
*
i beg to differ.

this doesnt look too shabby IMHO

user posted image


Added on January 18, 2011, 1:18 pmoh here's further info from

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-Asus-N...ok.43709.0.html

Intel HD Graphics 3000

Intel advertises its Sandy Bridge in particular with the incorporated graphic's enormous performance reserve increase, which will make the weak entry level graphic cards more or less obsolete in the future.

3DMark 2006 (1280x1024) supplies 5275 points and surprisingly is on the high level of a Geforce 9600M GT, a strong midrange graphics card two years ago. A GT 130M doesn't quite achieve this result with about 5000 points, while the GT 330M has only a slight lead with 5382 points (Sony VPC-CW2). Our test configuration achieves 1387 points with the Intel HD Graphics enabled in 3DMark Vantage. This is also on a comparable level as a 9600M GT or an ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 (1200 – 1300 points) and slightly behind a GT 130M (1595) or a bit in front of a Geforce 310M (1177 points in Asus' U30JC).

The mentioned graphics cards on a comparable level clearly illustrate the new incorporated Intel graphic's obviously extreme performance increase. The prior GMA HD reached up to 2000 points in 3DMark 2006 and a maximum of 340 points in 3DMark Vantage, for example. This would be an increase of more than 150%, respectively 300%. That is a multiple increase of the given performance reserves.

This post has been edited by dagnarus: Jan 18 2011, 01:20 PM
ALeUNe
post Jan 18 2011, 01:28 PM

I'm the purebred with aristocratic pedigree
Group Icon
VIP
9,692 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mongrel Isle
QUOTE(dagnarus @ Jan 18 2011, 01:16 PM)
i beg to differ.

this doesnt look too shabby IMHO

user posted image


Added on January 18, 2011, 1:18 pmoh here's further info from

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-Asus-N...ok.43709.0.html

Intel HD Graphics 3000

Intel advertises its Sandy Bridge in particular with the incorporated graphic's enormous performance reserve increase, which will make the weak entry level graphic cards more or less obsolete in the future.
3DMark 2006 (1280x1024) supplies 5275 points and surprisingly is on the high level of a Geforce 9600M GT, a strong midrange graphics card two years ago. A GT 130M doesn't quite achieve this result with about 5000 points, while the GT 330M has only a slight lead with 5382 points (Sony VPC-CW2). Our test configuration achieves 1387 points with the Intel HD Graphics enabled in 3DMark Vantage. This is also on a comparable level as a 9600M GT or an ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 (1200 – 1300 points) and slightly behind a GT 130M (1595) or a bit in front of a Geforce 310M (1177 points in Asus' U30JC).

The mentioned graphics cards on a comparable level clearly illustrate the new incorporated Intel graphic's obviously extreme performance increase. The prior GMA HD reached up to 2000 points in 3DMark 2006 and a maximum of 340 points in 3DMark Vantage, for example. This would be an increase of more than 150%, respectively 300%. That is a multiple increase of the given performance reserves.
Find out how the new Intel HD Graphics 3000 copes in gaming here, in our extensive special test.
*
GT330 score in my previous notebook.
http://3dmark.com/3dm06/15225022

I don't call it shabby too.
But it is not in the same class as GT330.
SB GPU is comparable to Geforce G310/Radeon5470.
dagnarus
post Jan 18 2011, 01:32 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
328 posts

Joined: Jul 2008


Sony VPC-CW2 this unit is using i5, and your unit is i7

i wonder if that's actually what drive the mark higher?

in all honesty, low end dedicated gfx card is nearing its demise.
ALeUNe
post Jan 18 2011, 01:40 PM

I'm the purebred with aristocratic pedigree
Group Icon
VIP
9,692 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mongrel Isle
QUOTE(dagnarus @ Jan 18 2011, 01:32 PM)
Sony VPC-CW2 this unit is using i5, and your unit is i7

i wonder if that's actually what drive the mark higher?

in all honesty, low end dedicated gfx card is nearing its demise.
*
Dell Vostro 3700 is using i5 too.
The point was different by 100 marks (if my memory serves me right).

SB GPU is meant to "replace" low end Gefore/Radeon.

P/S Correction.
The 3DMark06 score is different by 300-400 marks between the i5 & i7

This post has been edited by ALeUNe: Jan 19 2011, 01:56 AM
thexs
post Jan 22 2011, 02:14 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
202 posts

Joined: Nov 2010


At what temperatures should I start to worry about my GC?
My 5650 idles at ~50 but when I play games, it goes up to 85.

Is 85 okay for a GC or should I get a cooling pad?
raymond1989
post Jan 23 2011, 01:25 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
102 posts

Joined: May 2006


Hi to all sifu here. Just wanna know between HP Pavilion dv6-4003TX *ATI Mobility Radeon™ HD 6570 Graphics with 1 GB DDR5* and Asus N53SN *GB NVIDIA® GeForce® GT 550M with 2GB DDR3 VRAM* which one have better performance in gaming ar? Thanks..

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0234sec    0.59    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 09:36 AM