Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
144 Pages « < 111 112 113 114 115 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Hardware GPU discussion

views
     
dagnarus
post Jan 18 2011, 01:16 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
328 posts

Joined: Jul 2008


QUOTE(ALeUNe @ Jan 18 2011, 12:22 PM)
What talking you?
nVidia Geforce GT330 has the score of 7200+ in 3DMark06.
SB GPU has the score of 4400+ in 3DMark06.
*
i beg to differ.

this doesnt look too shabby IMHO

user posted image


Added on January 18, 2011, 1:18 pmoh here's further info from

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-Asus-N...ok.43709.0.html

Intel HD Graphics 3000

Intel advertises its Sandy Bridge in particular with the incorporated graphic's enormous performance reserve increase, which will make the weak entry level graphic cards more or less obsolete in the future.

3DMark 2006 (1280x1024) supplies 5275 points and surprisingly is on the high level of a Geforce 9600M GT, a strong midrange graphics card two years ago. A GT 130M doesn't quite achieve this result with about 5000 points, while the GT 330M has only a slight lead with 5382 points (Sony VPC-CW2). Our test configuration achieves 1387 points with the Intel HD Graphics enabled in 3DMark Vantage. This is also on a comparable level as a 9600M GT or an ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 (1200 – 1300 points) and slightly behind a GT 130M (1595) or a bit in front of a Geforce 310M (1177 points in Asus' U30JC).

The mentioned graphics cards on a comparable level clearly illustrate the new incorporated Intel graphic's obviously extreme performance increase. The prior GMA HD reached up to 2000 points in 3DMark 2006 and a maximum of 340 points in 3DMark Vantage, for example. This would be an increase of more than 150%, respectively 300%. That is a multiple increase of the given performance reserves.

This post has been edited by dagnarus: Jan 18 2011, 01:20 PM
ALeUNe
post Jan 18 2011, 01:28 PM

I'm the purebred with aristocratic pedigree
Group Icon
VIP
9,692 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mongrel Isle
QUOTE(dagnarus @ Jan 18 2011, 01:16 PM)
i beg to differ.

this doesnt look too shabby IMHO

user posted image


Added on January 18, 2011, 1:18 pmoh here's further info from

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-Asus-N...ok.43709.0.html

Intel HD Graphics 3000

Intel advertises its Sandy Bridge in particular with the incorporated graphic's enormous performance reserve increase, which will make the weak entry level graphic cards more or less obsolete in the future.
3DMark 2006 (1280x1024) supplies 5275 points and surprisingly is on the high level of a Geforce 9600M GT, a strong midrange graphics card two years ago. A GT 130M doesn't quite achieve this result with about 5000 points, while the GT 330M has only a slight lead with 5382 points (Sony VPC-CW2). Our test configuration achieves 1387 points with the Intel HD Graphics enabled in 3DMark Vantage. This is also on a comparable level as a 9600M GT or an ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 (1200 – 1300 points) and slightly behind a GT 130M (1595) or a bit in front of a Geforce 310M (1177 points in Asus' U30JC).

The mentioned graphics cards on a comparable level clearly illustrate the new incorporated Intel graphic's obviously extreme performance increase. The prior GMA HD reached up to 2000 points in 3DMark 2006 and a maximum of 340 points in 3DMark Vantage, for example. This would be an increase of more than 150%, respectively 300%. That is a multiple increase of the given performance reserves.
Find out how the new Intel HD Graphics 3000 copes in gaming here, in our extensive special test.
*
GT330 score in my previous notebook.
http://3dmark.com/3dm06/15225022

I don't call it shabby too.
But it is not in the same class as GT330.
SB GPU is comparable to Geforce G310/Radeon5470.
dagnarus
post Jan 18 2011, 01:32 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
328 posts

Joined: Jul 2008


Sony VPC-CW2 this unit is using i5, and your unit is i7

i wonder if that's actually what drive the mark higher?

in all honesty, low end dedicated gfx card is nearing its demise.
ALeUNe
post Jan 18 2011, 01:40 PM

I'm the purebred with aristocratic pedigree
Group Icon
VIP
9,692 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mongrel Isle
QUOTE(dagnarus @ Jan 18 2011, 01:32 PM)
Sony VPC-CW2 this unit is using i5, and your unit is i7

i wonder if that's actually what drive the mark higher?

in all honesty, low end dedicated gfx card is nearing its demise.
*
Dell Vostro 3700 is using i5 too.
The point was different by 100 marks (if my memory serves me right).

SB GPU is meant to "replace" low end Gefore/Radeon.

P/S Correction.
The 3DMark06 score is different by 300-400 marks between the i5 & i7

This post has been edited by ALeUNe: Jan 19 2011, 01:56 AM
thexs
post Jan 22 2011, 02:14 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
202 posts

Joined: Nov 2010


At what temperatures should I start to worry about my GC?
My 5650 idles at ~50 but when I play games, it goes up to 85.

Is 85 okay for a GC or should I get a cooling pad?
raymond1989
post Jan 23 2011, 01:25 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
102 posts

Joined: May 2006


Hi to all sifu here. Just wanna know between HP Pavilion dv6-4003TX *ATI Mobility Radeon™ HD 6570 Graphics with 1 GB DDR5* and Asus N53SN *GB NVIDIA® GeForce® GT 550M with 2GB DDR3 VRAM* which one have better performance in gaming ar? Thanks..
SUSngkhanmein
post Feb 7 2011, 10:51 AM

カラカラ Karakara
*******
Senior Member
7,727 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Ara Damansara, Petaling Jaya & Batu Pahat, Johor.


QUOTE(thexs @ Jan 22 2011, 02:14 PM)
At what temperatures should I start to worry about my GC?
My 5650 idles at ~50 but when I play games, it goes up to 85.

Is 85 okay for a GC or should I get a cooling pad?
*
80 is normal.. i bought zalman nc2000 really nice.. as for nc3000 is same price with nc2000.. its getting weird..
my max now reach 80 cos recently weather hot.. even got cooler u need place it with good ventilation area. i test at mirror table with cooler pad my processor get 47 the lowest and for GC around 45 in idle mode.


Added on February 7, 2011, 10:55 am
QUOTE(mdnurman @ Jan 2 2011, 01:01 PM)
between HD550v and HD5650, will there be any obvious differences in term of performance in productivity, FB games, video editing, movie watching (avi,mkv etc)? thanks
*
if for fb games is mostly no different. "5650 > 550v"
video editing, games & movies >>> 5650
performance u can see the different...

This post has been edited by ngkhanmein: Feb 7 2011, 10:55 AM
djronzai
post Feb 10 2011, 10:36 PM

KL ron
*****
Senior Member
881 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
ATI 6570 and nvidia GT540m , which 1 better
SUSngkhanmein
post Feb 11 2011, 11:34 AM

カラカラ Karakara
*******
Senior Member
7,727 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Ara Damansara, Petaling Jaya & Batu Pahat, Johor.


6570 > 540 but some part 540 win lah.. but overall still 6570 pawn 540 SLIGHTLY!


Added on February 11, 2011, 11:48 amthexs did u play dirt 2? u got openAL & rapture3D right? can del 1 ma?

This post has been edited by ngkhanmein: Feb 11 2011, 11:48 AM
djronzai
post Feb 11 2011, 05:21 PM

KL ron
*****
Senior Member
881 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
QUOTE(ngkhanmein @ Feb 11 2011, 11:34 AM)
6570 > 540 but some part 540 win lah.. but overall still 6570 pawn 540 SLIGHTLY!


Added on February 11, 2011, 11:48 amthexs did u play dirt 2? u got openAL & rapture3D right? can del 1 ma?
*
is it possible to play HIGH for crysis 2 on ATI 6570?
SUSngkhanmein
post Feb 14 2011, 11:27 AM

カラカラ Karakara
*******
Senior Member
7,727 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Ara Damansara, Petaling Jaya & Batu Pahat, Johor.


i dunno but i think ok gua.. but fps abit lower.. u as pro who play that games.. i din play..


Added on February 14, 2011, 11:29 amGDDR5 i think no problem de..

This post has been edited by ngkhanmein: Feb 14 2011, 11:29 AM
djronzai
post Feb 14 2011, 12:32 PM

KL ron
*****
Senior Member
881 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
QUOTE(ngkhanmein @ Feb 14 2011, 11:27 AM)
i dunno but i think ok gua.. but fps abit lower.. u as pro who play that games.. i din play..


Added on February 14, 2011, 11:29 amGDDR5 i think no problem de..
*
wanna enjoy the superior graphic by crytek... sad case they leaked the beta version.. i will be satisfied if i able to play at high setting by using ati 6570
Ulysses
post Feb 15 2011, 08:30 AM

尤利西斯
*******
Senior Member
2,822 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
From: Georgetown, Penang


Hi..I wanna ask..What is the best game that can be played on GT540m?
SUSngkhanmein
post Feb 15 2011, 01:50 PM

カラカラ Karakara
*******
Senior Member
7,727 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Ara Damansara, Petaling Jaya & Batu Pahat, Johor.


QUOTE(Ulysses @ Feb 15 2011, 08:30 AM)
Hi..I wanna ask..What is the best game that can be played on GT540m?
*
a lot lah.. stated at http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/1713602
budak nakal
post Feb 19 2011, 11:39 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
86 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


Hi guys,

I need your help regarding this 2 card......

NVIDIA® GeForce® GT 425M 1GB vs ATI Radeon HD6570 - 2GB in gaming performance

Because I got 2 choice of laptop to choose from the budget 2.6k from Asus spec.....between N43JF and A42JP

Please advice regarding this and if possible, can provide me with the link for the 3DMark result......

Thanks
Trance4eva
post Feb 19 2011, 11:51 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,801 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
HD 6570M is definitely way much more better than the GT425M
eugenechiuu
post Feb 20 2011, 01:36 AM

Gadget/Food Enthusiast
*******
Senior Member
2,909 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: London, United Kingdom or Kota Kinabalu, Sabah


QUOTE(ngkhanmein @ Feb 11 2011, 11:34 AM)
6570 > 540 but some part 540 win lah.. but overall still 6570 pawn 540 SLIGHTLY!


Added on February 11, 2011, 11:48 amthexs did u play dirt 2? u got openAL & rapture3D right? can del 1 ma?
*
540M is better than HD6570 if based on specs alone... Even in benchmarks 540M is better than HD6570 DDR3.. It was already proven between Acer 5750G and Lenovo Y560p, both have exact same specs except GPU but 3DMark06 for Acer 5750G is few hundred points higher.. but HD6570 DDR5 in HP-dv6 can pawn 540M though.... At least 10k points in 3D Mark 06..


SUSngkhanmein
post Feb 20 2011, 03:54 PM

カラカラ Karakara
*******
Senior Member
7,727 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Ara Damansara, Petaling Jaya & Batu Pahat, Johor.


QUOTE(eugenechiuu @ Feb 20 2011, 01:36 AM)
540M is better than HD6570 if based on specs alone... Even in benchmarks 540M is better than HD6570 DDR3.. It was already proven between Acer 5750G and Lenovo Y560p, both have exact same specs except GPU but 3DMark06 for Acer 5750G is few hundred points higher.. but HD6570 DDR5 in HP-dv6 can pawn 540M though.... At least 10k points in 3D Mark 06..
*
yup but i thought 6570 come with GDRR5 only.. it got come with GDRR3? shocking.gif
Trance4eva
post Feb 20 2011, 04:19 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,801 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
QUOTE(ngkhanmein @ Feb 20 2011, 03:54 PM)
yup but i thought 6570 come with GDRR5 only.. it got come with GDRR3?  shocking.gif
*
every GPU comes with GDDR5 and GDDR3.....
Mr.Docter
post Feb 20 2011, 08:07 PM

Doctorpreneurs
*******
Senior Member
5,367 posts

Joined: Aug 2009



QUOTE(djronzai @ Feb 11 2011, 05:21 PM)
is it possible to play HIGH for crysis 2 on ATI 6570?
*
how to guess since we don't have any idea how good is Crytek Engine performance this time.

anyhow, maybe possible without native resolution. precise FPS is totally unknown tho.

144 Pages « < 111 112 113 114 115 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0227sec    0.45    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 05:41 PM