thx guys for the compliments. FYI, there was no editing what so ever been done to the snap.It was the original snap.

here is the exiff data for the snap

Exposure: 0.033 sec (1/30)
Aperture: f/4.5
Focal Length: 11 mm
ISO Speed: 800
Exposure Bias: 0 EV
Flash: Off
White Balance: Tungsten

the story behind the snap was, I'm on my way going to the bus stand in front of the KLCC, after a day of street shooting. Once i walked out front the KLCC, I looked up and damn, the view of the 2 building and the lighting was so magnificent. I stopped, get my A700 and uwa and shoot!

how i get the rich blue? While i'm inside KLCC, i set my WB to tungsten and when i walked out from KLCC, i forgot to changed it...I just snap
! but...it came out beautifully!

jio marushin, u make me the very jeles i think the accidental WB turned out awesome la bro!

which part i made u jeles?the photo?the WB?or the gear?

just kidding bro...

uwa sepam...



another one..



CnC pls..

nice ones bro... the first one nampak mcm dull sikit la... the 2nd one i like, the rumput like distracting a lil dontcha think?

thanks bro.. will try to improve next time... hehehe

I hope you're not pixel peeping. If you blow up a pic too much, it WILL pixelate no matter what cam you use.

How about you give us a sample shot and we can see what the problem is.

ok.

---

Added on June 8, 2009, 11:30 ampixel peeping? are you mean over zooming a picture >100%? i am currently to setup the pic, later will know the result. coating the car mirror. later will drop some water on it and snap the photo. my previous shot in this scenario shows me the pic is not sharp when see at 100%, so, major of my picture can be perform 100% crop

will post soon...

This post has been edited by jimlim007: Jun 8 2009, 11:30 AM

most, if not all cameras will not give a 100% sharp image for certain, that is due to an anti aliasing filter (digital/physical) to reduce/remove aliasing artifacts in an image, a good anti aliasing filter will show least amount of softening of an image, but does not remove all softening.. so in another words, even the highest end digital camera will give you the same result if u zoom way in at 100%

how come the Bower flash's body looks somewhat like Falcon Eyes flash??

please tell me that Falcon Eyes are more reliable than Bower flashes... or any comments from someone who's using it now or before...

I'm choosing Falcon Eyes DPT386-AFZ from the HVL-F42AM coz of the swiveling head... was that the right move??

haven't bought yet... but any advices?? before I do buy it??

what do u mean by swivelling head? the F42 can swivel too..

IT CAN???? I thought It cant?! dang.. well.. nvm lah... keep the HVL-F42AM for my next purchase lah... hehehe... getting the Falcon Eyes for now... cheaper too... hehehe... thanks for the info bro...

haha to be precise bro...

1) the accidental WB
2) the photo, it's beautiful!
3) ur A700! hehehe

only the F36 cant..
yw

where u plan to buy ur falcon eye? let's buy together , mayb can ask fomr more discount =P

Braynumb, the Falcon Eyes DPT386-AFZ is the same thing as the Vivitar DF400MZ and the Bower flash.

The F36 is the only flash that cannot turn left and right. The F42 can turn left and right like a human head does when looking left and right. The F58 tilts sideways like a human does when reading a sideways emoticon.

hahhaha, human cannot turn head 180 backwards........ LOL

how much u purchase it? when u reach kuching i want to molest your falcon eyes & 50mm 1.7

Huh? The F42 cannot swivel, meh?

since when f42 cannot swivel? if cannot swivel someone might glue it coz fall down & break previously