Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
126 Pages « < 12 13 14 15 16 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography Nikon D40/D40x/D60/D5000 V5, Best entry level DSLR from Nikon

views
     
project-o
post May 31 2009, 01:48 PM

PROJECT-O
******
Senior Member
1,182 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
I'm guessing it is because of the Exposure Bias Setting. It should be at 0EV (-0.7 is 2/3 of a stop under expose). What lens are you using ?
Another thing you can do is add a bounce card to the flash if the ceiling is too high.
QUOTE(kevyeoh @ May 31 2009, 01:42 PM)
ok...from the file properties....

top left pic
f-stop: f/5.6
Exposure bias: -0.7step
Exposure time: 1/20sec
ISO Speed: ISO-1100
Focal length: 85mm
Max aperture: 5
Bottom left pic:
F-stop: f/5.6
Exposure time: 1/10s
ISO speed: ISO-200
Exposure bias: -0.7 step
Focal length: 1.5mm
Max aperture: 5
*
This post has been edited by project-o: May 31 2009, 01:49 PM
TSkimurastanley
post May 31 2009, 02:41 PM

Freak
******
Senior Member
1,580 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Melaka, Singapore


Try restore the exposure bias to 0eV and try
alpha_company
post May 31 2009, 05:23 PM

One Hand Punch Mega
*******
Senior Member
4,016 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: ★MALAYSIA★ Status: Photographing



QUOTE(zellleonhart @ May 29 2009, 12:12 PM)
Indeed very bulky. i am a D40+ Di622 user. When you sling the D40 mounted wih di622 on your neck the di622 which is heavy will make the whole camera points downwards, which is kinda weird and bulky. The lens is pointing downwards instead of forward =.=
But performance wise Di622 serves me well, I haven't tried Sb600, because I can't afford it and I don't have friends who own it...
*
yeah.. but i use cybertik mz45 flash.. combined with the almost half a kilogram of tamron 17-50 f2.8 it points down like there's no tomorrow.

even without the flash it points down too... maybe i need a battery grip..to balance it out
project-o
post May 31 2009, 05:36 PM

PROJECT-O
******
Senior Member
1,182 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
Tamron 17-50 f2.8.... rich we are tongue.gif

How's the performance of the 17-50 f2.8 ?
QUOTE(alpha_company @ May 31 2009, 05:23 PM)
yeah.. but i use cybertik mz45 flash.. combined with the almost half a kilogram of tamron 17-50 f2.8 it points down like there's no tomorrow.

even without the flash it points down too... maybe i need a battery grip..to balance it out
*
alpha_company
post May 31 2009, 05:47 PM

One Hand Punch Mega
*******
Senior Member
4,016 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: ★MALAYSIA★ Status: Photographing



thought of getting the 18-200VR for wedding shots. but a lot of people recommend me to get the tamron 1750 f2.8. glad i did.

for close up pics, f2.8 is fine, but for normal portrait wedding shots, the sharpest pic u can get with this lens is at f4-f5.6.

but one thing about it though, comparing it against my friend's nikon 18-55 & tamron 70-300 and my previously owned nikon 55-200VR, you will notice that it weighs a lot...man is it heavy.
TSkimurastanley
post May 31 2009, 05:55 PM

Freak
******
Senior Member
1,580 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Melaka, Singapore


QUOTE(alpha_company @ May 31 2009, 05:47 PM)
thought of getting the 18-200VR for wedding shots. but a lot of people recommend me to get the tamron 1750 f2.8. glad i did.

for close up pics, f2.8 is fine, but for normal portrait wedding shots, the sharpest pic u can get with this lens is at f4-f5.6.

but one thing about it though, comparing it against my friend's nikon 18-55 & tamron 70-300 and my previously owned nikon 55-200VR, you will notice that it weighs a lot...man is it heavy.
*
Agree with the last statement. It's really heavy for a 17-55mm lens
project-o
post May 31 2009, 05:56 PM

PROJECT-O
******
Senior Member
1,182 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
18-200VR is out of the question.... it is expensive.. and not as sharp as the Tamron 17-50. Only thing that I didn't really like about it was that the built in motor is quite slow (as in slower than 18-135). So other than the 17-50 ... you don't have a Tele lens..or a Super wide ?
QUOTE(alpha_company @ May 31 2009, 05:47 PM)
thought of getting the 18-200VR for wedding shots. but a lot of people recommend me to get the tamron 1750 f2.8. glad i did.

for close up pics, f2.8 is fine, but for normal portrait wedding shots, the sharpest pic u can get with this lens is at f4-f5.6.

but one thing about it though, comparing it against my friend's nikon 18-55 & tamron 70-300 and my previously owned nikon 55-200VR, you will notice that it weighs a lot...man is it heavy.
*
alpha_company
post May 31 2009, 06:01 PM

One Hand Punch Mega
*******
Senior Member
4,016 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: ★MALAYSIA★ Status: Photographing



QUOTE(project-o @ May 31 2009, 05:56 PM)
18-200VR is out of the question.... it is expensive.. and not as sharp as the Tamron 17-50. Only thing that I didn't really like about it was that the built in motor is quite slow (as in slower than 18-135). So other than the 17-50 ... you don't have a Tele lens..or a Super wide ?
*
no uwa-ultra wide lens.. dont need it anyways..

thinking of getting a tele 70-300 VRii lens...but still not sure as i need to buy a dslr bagpack and battery grip.
project-o
post May 31 2009, 06:06 PM

PROJECT-O
******
Senior Member
1,182 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
Better to get a backpack..and the grip if it is useful. Too bad my sold already or else would offer you a good price smile.gif
alpha_company
post May 31 2009, 06:12 PM

One Hand Punch Mega
*******
Senior Member
4,016 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: ★MALAYSIA★ Status: Photographing



y did u sell yours?

what brand?

what backpack you guys recommend?

This post has been edited by alpha_company: May 31 2009, 06:15 PM
project-o
post May 31 2009, 06:18 PM

PROJECT-O
******
Senior Member
1,182 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
Mine was a YXTM grip. Most of the brands are about the same. Sold it b'cos I didn't need it anymore and the vertical shutter button was not as useful as I thought. After selling this and kit lens went and got 35 f1.8 lens.
shutterdll
post May 31 2009, 06:23 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
255 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
QUOTE(kevyeoh @ May 31 2009, 01:42 PM)
ok...from the file properties....

top left pic
f-stop: f/5.6
Exposure bias: -0.7step
Exposure time: 1/20sec
ISO Speed: ISO-1100
Focal length: 85mm
Max aperture: 5
Bottom left pic:
F-stop: f/5.6
Exposure time: 1/10s
ISO speed: ISO-200
Exposure bias: -0.7 step
Focal length: 1.5mm
Max aperture: 5
*
1/10s must have very steady hand and the baby cannot move too much.
invest in external flash will help a lot thumbup.gif
alpha_company
post May 31 2009, 06:24 PM

One Hand Punch Mega
*******
Senior Member
4,016 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: ★MALAYSIA★ Status: Photographing



the vertical shutter no use because cant af.

yxtm? not phottix ka?

google and see OWNUSER (nice grip design) biggrin.gif), Phottix & the d60 grip with lcd on the back..

heard from my friend got a new d60 grip from meike.
project-o
post May 31 2009, 06:30 PM

PROJECT-O
******
Senior Member
1,182 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
YXTM, Phottix, Hahnel and another brand "Battery Grip" are about the same.. look about the same... price about the same except Hahnel a bit higher b'cos with spare battery and remote. I've heard of Ownuser grips and seen pics but have not seen the real thing.
TSkimurastanley
post May 31 2009, 07:00 PM

Freak
******
Senior Member
1,580 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Melaka, Singapore


QUOTE(shutterdll @ May 31 2009, 06:23 PM)
1/10s must have very steady hand and the baby cannot move too much.
invest in external flash will help a lot  thumbup.gif
*
He's indeed using the SB-600 to shoot. Only problem is the pics still underexposed
General_Nic
post May 31 2009, 07:18 PM

D5000 fully loaded n ready to shoot~!!
*******
Senior Member
3,508 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(kimurastanley @ May 31 2009, 07:00 PM)
He's indeed using the SB-600 to shoot. Only problem is the pics still underexposed
*
maybe SB-600 not powerful enaf? laugh.gif

lol, jz jk, no harm meant tongue.gif
TSkimurastanley
post May 31 2009, 07:37 PM

Freak
******
Senior Member
1,580 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Melaka, Singapore


QUOTE(General_Nic @ May 31 2009, 07:18 PM)
maybe SB-600 not powerful enaf?  laugh.gif

lol, jz jk, no harm meant  tongue.gif
*
may be the exposure bias was turned to -0.7 that causes this
Firdaus92
post May 31 2009, 08:07 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
980 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Kuala Lumpur


Guys, I got a friend who want to sell SB600 for price range between RM450-RM500 he said. He's still thinking about it. Should I go for it?The condition is overall still good. 9/10 if I might say. blush.gif
AlphaBeta
post May 31 2009, 08:09 PM

I have stars, got problem?
*******
Senior Member
2,955 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: Perth Oz



yea it is cheap..IF the condition is good.
TSkimurastanley
post May 31 2009, 08:09 PM

Freak
******
Senior Member
1,580 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Melaka, Singapore


QUOTE(Firdaus92 @ May 31 2009, 08:07 PM)
Guys, I got a friend who want to sell SB600 for price range between RM450-RM500 he said. He's still thinking about it. Should I go for it?The condition is overall still good. 9/10 if I might say.  blush.gif
*
if the condition is still good, that's a pretty cheap price for a second hand SB-600. Jst go for it

126 Pages « < 12 13 14 15 16 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0200sec    0.27    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 07:48 PM