QUOTE(jayniel @ Jul 29 2009, 12:01 AM)
i don't know much about P1, as this is my first attempt.. different people tell me different stories.. that's why i want feedback from as many people as possible.. thanks for the reply anyway

if there's anyone else who would like to add, pls do ya.. i cant comprehend why some people who study hard for P1 can fail but some who only studied a little bit can pass first attempt.. is it really based on logic thinking, that only little knowledge is needed, and the rest is common sense?
some people say that Parmindar cover quite a lot during his revisions, so that would suffice.. i don't know, can anyone comment on this? has anyone only attended his revisions and passed?
P1 is all about ethics & corporate governance.
ACCA never had such syllabus in the past but other professional qualifications like CIMA did have it. So acca "copy" & bring it to ACCA as P1.
They did that with F5 & P5. Previously performance management & finance is combined but now separated in both F & P level.
Parmindar RI class : is like a summary of his entire normal class (no practical examples & more key points driven)
RE class : He will focus more on exam questions analysis (trends, format, style......)
P1 is also like a psycological paper in which there is no one correct answer. If you can bluff & reason appropriately marker will also give you marks.
Example : A very simplified version.
Director ask you to do creative accounting (Ie : increase profit by 300%) & will get a BMW car as reward. If not he will fire you & ask another one to do it. Question, how will you proceed & elaborate.
1) Said No but Do it anyway (forced to do so)
2) Said No & resign
3) Said Yes but never do it (whistle blowing)
4) Said Yes & do it (get a BMW car)
If you can explain like a lawyer at court, marker will even give you full marks even if you condone creative accounting (marker expect you to be in real life condition). By the way creative accounting is unethical not illegal. This distinction is very important in exam.
Another more simplified version :
Is killing right ?
No : Every religion prohibits it (except crusade & jihad), no right to take it (court's motto),.....
Yes : Kill one to save thousands is acceptable (Sun Tzu), kill or be killed (nature's order),......
This is just to give you a rough picture & dont expect it will be that easy. Question 1 normally span few pages.
Hope this can clear your confusion.