QUOTE(Deimos Tel`Arin @ Apr 1 2009, 02:53 PM)
incorrect.
the correct word to use should be:
but to
materialistic girls an LV or tiffany would be our dream

I totally disagree, which girl do not dream of a diamond engagement ring?
which girl do not like beautiful cloths?
which girl do not like shopping?
So girls who like LV or diamond are automatically classified into materialistic?
QUOTE(Bees @ Apr 1 2009, 02:53 PM)
but the gals nvr think of how many % of salary will encoutered for their bf?
they didnt think how the bf work condition, gals are selfish.....
I can see from SPA some guys their are relaxing without gals calling them......
dream is 1 thing, reality is 1 thing....
let said u r my gf, i like ferrari then u hav to buy 4 me in order make me happy?
This is not call selfish, this are only personal standard, just like you do not marry fat ugly girl can I say you're selfish?
QUOTE(Deimos Tel`Arin @ Apr 1 2009, 02:53 PM)
that strongly depends on how materialistic the girl is.
if the girl is 100% materialistic, she will pick the rich guy.
Again I disagree, why the girl could be thinking she can give her children better life, or she could be thinking of her parents or bro n sister.
QUOTE(POYOZER @ Apr 1 2009, 03:38 PM)
One of the richest man in Malaysia, he didn’t buy branded things. His primary car is just Proton Perdana. Half of his income goes to charity.

we're talking interm of general, dun gimme one person and conclude everyone is like that, then it would be easy to prove me wrong that mother teresa do not wear LV or a tiffany diamond ring
Cars like ferraris are millionaires toys, they exist because millionaires buys them and that is the standard of life, not by your quote of someone you know who are rich but thrifty.