QUOTE(chicaman @ Dec 4 2008, 02:52 PM)
I think u are wrong,
Let me ask u a question, Core 2 Duo 2.6GHz compare with Pentium D 3.0GHz which one is faster and better?
N78 does not have a graphic accelerator chip. Try running Global Racing game in ur N78 and N82 and u will see the difference. N-GAGE and some other 3D game does not utilize the graphic accelerator thats why u see there isnt much difference compare to N82.
Why is N78 battery life is better ? Because it uses only single CPU, look at N95 N82 etc which using dual CPU, both of them having crappy battery life.
Why N78 cannot record video at 640x480 @ 30FPS? Because of the graphic accelerator and CPU.
Why N78 camera is only 3.2megapix? because of the OMAP Processor cannot support 5megapix. (graphic accelerator comes with the processor)
However 6220 classic using the same CPU as N78 but support 5megapix, quite amuzing, I have no idea why but the explaination above is true and facts

regarding N78
Yes i agree with the same facts.. i know most of what you talking about..I know n78 has no graphic accelerator.. i know all those.. what i was saying to previous user is to explain that multitasking capabilities on most N series and later nokia phones are getting better..
N78 and 6220 classic basically using the same processor and only thing is that 6220 classic does not have WIFI ( else i buy it! ) and also does not have FM transmitter.. also 6220 classic capture video at 30fps whilst n78 only at 15fps??? Also the 6220 can do TVOut!
The answer here is marketing strategies and Nokia been using these ploy for the longest time and now it is more evident in later models..now they are having difficult time and placing its products according to price and features since most features now are mostly similar s or should i say most users now wants to have the same features on all their nokia models..!
Interms of manufacturing it is better to produce the same internal parts and architecture rather then having few hundreds different parts and architectures.. so only thing nokia could do is to disable certain features internally but remain most general specs..by doing this they can segment modes according to price.
Nokia is one of biggest and leading phone manufacturer in the world because they have almost every phone for every segment of the market.. from the cheapest to the most expensive and most advanced.. In terms of manufacturing and R&D this would be a nightmare because to maintain such capacity would take a lot of resources and money. Thats why nokia phones are expensive.. unlike Iphone whereby till now only have 1 basic architechture... but at current already hold 16.9% world phone market share.. which is a great strategy!!
Again fren my comment earlier was not bout specifications but the multitasking capabilities..which i think most current nokia phones (N series ) are good at.. and compare batter performance are atleast better then most win mobile phones..
The issue here is depending on the user.. If you want excellent gaming graphics then definitely go with nokia phone swhich has 3D accelerators.. I would rather go for and all rounder phone which is cheap and equal acceptable performance! compare to the next manufacturer i think nokia is at the most top interms of price vs performance ratios.
Here is something to think about : N85 - Single Processor ARM11 369MHz with 3D accelerator???? (yep same processor as n78)
for more device specs comparison :
http://www.forum.nokia.com/devices/matrix_s60_3ed_fp2_1.htmlI do not aggree on your performace comparison they are many test out there whereby the single cpu arm11 beats even the OMAP dual core processors.. just check out this comments below.. NOkia has now proved that without 3D accelerator in ARM11 single processors it could run 3d games and perform multitasking and have better battery life.. At cuurent faster does not mean better.. efficiency and overall performance counts
QUOTE
N85 vs N96 :The real Test:
Design and Ergonomics
The style of N96 is an intermediate solution between the older and newer concepts used by the company in product design. N85 definitely looks better, standing closer to the newer design trend adopted by Nokia. Have a look at 6600 and you¡¯re pretty sure to snatch the idea. N85 and N96 are entirely composed of plastic while the 6600 slide makes an extensive use of metal, though. Materials other than plastic are reserved for Eseries and S40 products, in Nokia¡¯s philosophy. N85 and N96 display an almost identical quality of plastic save for the face panel, which is definitely better in Nokia N85. The rounded, lacquered casing looks quite elegant; both smartphones are rather exposed to soiling, though.The quality of assembly is on a comparable level for the both models, the only exception being the slider mechanism. It produces a much better impression in N85. The N96 has a jerky, tight slider, which might be a bit annoying to the more picky buyers. The size and weight are two of the major points making up the ergonomics score. N96 is too wide to sit in the hand naturally. That happens primarily because of a large screen, N85 has a screen with a diagonal shorter by a 0.2¡¯¡¯ ¨C the same situation with N95 and N95 8Gb. A bigger casing, surprisingly, does not improve the operational comfort of the N96 keyboard. The upper button row is too close to the edge, and the rest of the rows suffer from a poor segmentation. SMS typing feels much better with an N85.
A couple of words on the colors. N96 will only come in black, and N85 is currently available in purple and brown, with a few extra colors to come. The lens framing alternatively serves as a tip-up prop enabling the phone to stand on a surface when you want to comfortably browse through your photos and videos. N85 has nothing of the kind, but you will eventually discover an FM transmitter which is nowhere around in N96. The charger jack is the same thing with the microUSB slot in N85, making it the first Nokia smartphone to possess a USB charging capability. N96 doesn¡¯t replenish the battery charge while being connected to another device with the data cable.
An active lens guard is something only found in N85. A slide of the lens guard launches the camera application, which is just immensely handy. Dedicated player buttons are grouped around the central joystick button. With N85, you get these buttons only backlit if the player is running ¨C not a critical but very neat designer¡¯s trick. We are generally inclined to think that Nokia didn¡¯t care too much about the appearance, looking more on the lumberjack¡¯s side rather than on the gentleman¡¯s, and doesn¡¯t stand well against the elegance of N85.
The screen of N85 is identical in size to the original N95 (2.6¡¯¡¯) but bases off the AM-OLED technology. This helps to notch down the power consumption and gives a better looking palette. Oh well, the view angles also appear wider and the refresh rate is pleasantly high. On the whole, this screen is obviously better than the display of N96, - but don¡¯t take this as an offense to the latter, its screen is just plainly good but N85 offers a perfection in this aspect.
In the visual comparison with N96. It seems to fail in the competition with N85.To do N96 justice, we must tell you that the color palette reproduced by its screen looks a bit more natural, but that doesn¡¯t help the cause much. A larger diagonal is a much more serious matter, doubling its importance for every fan of digital books optimized for reading from a screen of a handheld gadget. Both models offer a comparable quality of TV picture when you use the TV-out.Camera
Following the tradition, Nokia equipped the two models with a (high-)standard camera unit carrying Carl Zeiss optics. Upon a closer inspection it is revealed that the photo quality is actually different. Prior to testing we made sure that all the settings had been set the same (the flash is identical in both models, - a double LED unit a bit weaker than the xenon flash of N82, for example). The idea is simple: just have a look at the pictures and see how the focal distance and viewing angles are related. Definitly N85 is leading in test with flash turned on and off alike.
Hardware Platform
The hardware platform of Nokia N96 is totally different form the chipset used in N85 and other Nokias. The new hardware platform is a Nomadics STn8815 chip by STMicroelectronics. This fact caused a great amount of arguments, for some people had recklessly put an equation mark between N85 and N96, wasting their breath about the same hardware lying in the base of the two handsets. Nokia N85 uses the regular hardware same with N78 and N81. As seen from the test score, N96 displays a lower performance than N85 and a much worse one than N95 basing off OMAP 2420. The lack of a 3D accelerator is blatant in the JBenchmark 3D test. N96 lags behind in other tests as well. The gap may be accounted for by the use of a newly developed platform, while N85 employs a platform which has been through a long evolution of improvements and optimizations shared by Nokia N78 and N81 models. There¡¯s little sense in repeating the descriptions of this platform since it has already been dealt with in our review of Samsung i450. Despite the lags seen in the tests, N85 and N96 have identical audio quality, a bit above the sounding of N78 and a bit below than Samsung i8510 INNOV8. The audio quality provided by N78 seems to please the majority of the owners, so an even better sound is simply great.
Let¡¯s have a brief overview the difference between the STn8810 and OMAP 2420 chipsets. Theoretically possessing worse characteristics than TI OMAP 2520, the new chipset pays back with a lower power consumption, high sound quality (out of the box, we don¡¯t regard the possible use of additional dedicated sound processing chips) and better video processing algorithms. The most effort was invested into making the battery life longer. It¡¯s about the time to dismiss the fear that the low-capacity battery used in Nokia N96 (950 mAh) won¡¯t be enough for comfortable operation. Actually, the device can run longer than most TI OMAP solutions, the advantage becoming increasingly obvious during video and music playback. STn8815 is optimized for minimal energy consumption; it will automatically drop the CPU frequency to a level sufficient for normal functioning of an application but not a notch above. It also makes an extensive use of smart accelerators and divided calculation techniques to drop the load on the CPU. Inactive chipset components are automatically powered off until a need arises to put them back online, the CPU stays in a power-saving mode as long as possible. Code execution efficiency was maximized through numerous optimizations as well.STMicroelectronics Nomadics STn8815 Specifications We didn¡¯t manage to spot any tangible performance boost in most menus and applications as compared to OMAP 2420. The lack of a hardware 3D accelerator is the only weak point distinguishing STMicroelectronics chips from their OMAP 2420/2430 counterparts as goes to performance. On the other hand, the use of 3D acceleration was intentionally minimized in N95 and N82 (it wasn¡¯t even used in N-Gage games) and totally missing in Samsung i550/i560, so we wouldn¡¯t consider this lack a critical downside of STn8815-based products.
Overall
We believe that N96 can not justify the high price it sells for by its scarce advantages. We would never recommend it as a replacement for N95 or its upgraded version N95 8Gb ¨C you are basically getting nothing from what you would want to see in a smartphone priced like that. A digital TV tuner isn¡¯t overly demanded on the market, so this addition won¡¯t pass for a real advantage. The rest of improvements are even less significant. At the same time, N85 appears to be a perfectly balanced solution worthy of being titled as the successor to N95 with multiple improvements in all departments of functionality and also a better looking appearance, higher quality of materials and assembly.
So for Sure N85 is definitly the winner...
N85 / n96 controversy
http://smape.com/en/reviews/nokia/Nokia_N85_N96-comp.htmlThis post has been edited by intune: Dec 4 2008, 04:11 PM