Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
129 Pages « < 28 29 30 31 32 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 AMD/ATi HD 4000 Series Discussion V4, Just added: HD4830 benches!

views
     
Lacus
post Oct 2 2008, 03:42 AM

Lacus Sama No Tameni!
Group Icon
Staff
5,250 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
lol..4870 should last quite long imo...
spideysam
post Oct 2 2008, 03:52 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
937 posts

Joined: Dec 2004


arr.. y 4870 is the highest version gc for ati?? lol.. got more higher 1??? lol


Added on October 2, 2008, 3:56 amlol the 4870 x 2 is quite expensive.. got any difference wit only single?? just tat is 2gb vs 512mb.. lol.. hmmmm... can create high setting game then lol

This post has been edited by spideysam: Oct 2 2008, 03:56 AM
iostream
post Oct 2 2008, 10:17 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
286 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(spideysam @ Oct 2 2008, 03:52 AM)
arr.. y 4870 is the highest version gc for ati?? lol.. got more higher 1??? lol


Added on October 2, 2008, 3:56 amlol the 4870 x 2 is quite expensive.. got any difference wit only single?? just tat is 2gb vs 512mb.. lol.. hmmmm... can create high setting game then lol
*
google is your best fren. doh.gif
commandboy
post Oct 2 2008, 10:38 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
QUOTE(spideysam @ Oct 2 2008, 03:52 AM)
arr.. y 4870 is the highest version gc for ati?? lol.. got more higher 1??? lol


Added on October 2, 2008, 3:56 amlol the 4870 x 2 is quite expensive.. got any difference wit only single?? just tat is 2gb vs 512mb.. lol.. hmmmm... can create high setting game then lol
*
4870x2 Key Features
2.4 teraFLOPS of GPU power
2 GB of GDDR5 memory
1600 stream processing units
2 x 256-bit memory interface
DirectX® 10.1
2 x RV770 GPU

4850/70 Key Features
1 teraFLOPS of GPU compute power
512 or 1GB of GDDR3/GDDR5 memory
800 stream processing units
256-bit memory interface
DirectX® 10.1
1 x RV770 GPU

This post has been edited by commandboy: Oct 2 2008, 10:42 AM
nagflar
post Oct 2 2008, 12:12 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,813 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: Lower Perak


QUOTE(spideysam @ Oct 2 2008, 03:52 AM)
arr.. y 4870 is the highest version gc for ati?? lol.. got more higher 1??? lol


Added on October 2, 2008, 3:56 amlol the 4870 x 2 is quite expensive.. got any difference wit only single?? just tat is 2gb vs 512mb.. lol.. hmmmm... can create high setting game then lol
*
not just high setting . is max setting at 22' , 24' , even 30' lcd .
picksickrick
post Oct 2 2008, 02:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
299 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
need help....CoolViva Pro works for 4850? anyone using it?


Lacus
post Oct 2 2008, 02:48 PM

Lacus Sama No Tameni!
Group Icon
Staff
5,250 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
no end debating on this leh..like that, u go buy a 4870x2 then shakehead.gif


Added on October 2, 2008, 2:50 pmdon't think it works,from the looks of it..ur stock cooler will even work much better than this...u using gainward right? custom cooler should b more than enough wat..

This post has been edited by Lacus: Oct 2 2008, 02:50 PM
viperiii
post Oct 2 2008, 06:07 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
498 posts

Joined: Apr 2008


QUOTE(Lacus @ Oct 2 2008, 02:48 PM)
no end debating on this leh..like that, u go buy a 4870x2 then  shakehead.gif


Added on October 2, 2008, 2:50 pmdon't think it works,from the looks of it..ur stock cooler will even work much better than this...u using gainward right? custom cooler should b more than enough wat..
*
4870x2 = high power consumption + expensive + a lot of heat!
better get a low power consumption + desirable performance 4830 card, next month!!
Lacus
post Oct 2 2008, 06:19 PM

Lacus Sama No Tameni!
Group Icon
Staff
5,250 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
lower? 4670 then -.-...or not it's 4850 >_>"
viperiii
post Oct 2 2008, 06:34 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
498 posts

Joined: Apr 2008


QUOTE(Lacus @ Oct 2 2008, 06:19 PM)
lower? 4670 then -.-...or not it's 4850 >_>"
*
4830 strike on the middle.
4830 performance is superior than 4670, and it is 256 bits memory bandwidth, 640 shader processor, based of RV770 LE chip, lower ppwer consumption overall as compared to 4850 cards.
4670 is of 128 bits memory bandwidth, 320 shader processors, based on RV730 chip.
They are of different class of graphic card!!

4830 card is for the performance mainstream, 4670 is only for mainstream.
4830 series of graphic cards are expected to debute later on this month (end of october, 2008)


XiuKeong
post Oct 2 2008, 06:45 PM

[OMG] Sweetie™
*******
Senior Member
9,440 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: Oz




QUOTE(viperiii @ Oct 2 2008, 06:34 PM)
4830 strike on the middle.
4830 performance is superior than 4670, and it is 256 bits memory bandwidth, 640 shader processor, based of RV770 LE chip, lower ppwer consumption overall as compared to 4850 cards.
4670 is of 128 bits memory bandwidth, 320 shader processors, based on RV730 chip.
They are of different class of graphic card!!

4830 card is for the performance mainstream, 4670 is only for mainstream.
4830 series of graphic cards are expected to debute later on this month (end of october, 2008)
*
Price should be around 450-500.
spideysam
post Oct 2 2008, 07:38 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
937 posts

Joined: Dec 2004


ooo... hmmm 4830 and 4850 no difference in proccesing graphic??? lol then the 4870 x 2 in 30 inch lcd also can... lol... i think 24 inch big enough also.. lol..
viperiii
post Oct 2 2008, 09:01 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
498 posts

Joined: Apr 2008


QUOTE(spideysam @ Oct 2 2008, 07:38 PM)
ooo... hmmm 4830 and 4850 no difference in proccesing graphic??? lol then the 4870 x 2 in 30 inch lcd also can... lol... i think 24 inch big enough also.. lol..
*
4830 and 4850 comparisons:
PART I: SIMILARITIES
1. 55nm manufacturing process.
2. Direct X 10.1 support.
3. 256 bits memory support.
4. basic gpu architecture is basically the same.

PART II: DIFFERENCES
1. code name different: 4830 = RV770LE, 4850 = RV770 PRO
2. no. shader processor: 4830 = 640 shader processors, 4850 = 800 shader processors.
3. system power requirement: 4830 consumes less power than 4850.
4. heat generated: 4830 is cooler than his elder brother 4850.


Siu_Keong
post Oct 2 2008, 09:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
218 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Bukit Jalil <-> Muar


QUOTE(spideysam @ Oct 2 2008, 07:38 PM)
ooo... hmmm 4830 and 4850 no difference in proccesing graphic??? lol then the 4870 x 2 in 30 inch lcd also can... lol... i think 24 inch big enough also.. lol..
*
So far is know that HD4830 have 640 stream processors instead of the HD4850 800 stream processors, but maybe the processor clock and memory will be cut down since it is different class compare HD4850, havent know yet must wait the official announce. hmm.gif

The HD4830 still require the 6 pin 75 watt as the external power source, that's mean the power for the PCI-E (150watt) is not enough to support it. IMHO, if the price is RM500 or more, i will go for HD4850GS for more performance per value. laugh.gif
viperiii
post Oct 2 2008, 09:10 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
498 posts

Joined: Apr 2008


QUOTE(Siu_Keong @ Oct 2 2008, 09:08 PM)
So far is know that HD4830 have 640 stream processors instead of the HD4850 800 stream processors, but maybe the processor clock and memory will be cut down since it is different class compare HD4850, havent know yet must wait the official announce.  hmm.gif

The HD4830 still require the 6 pin 75 watt as the external power source, that's mean the power for the PCI-E (150watt) is not enough to support it. IMHO, if the price is RM500 or more, i will go for HD4850GS for more performance per value.  laugh.gif
*
ok let wait and see how.. drool.gif
Siu_Keong
post Oct 2 2008, 09:15 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
218 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Bukit Jalil <-> Muar


QUOTE(viperiii @ Oct 2 2008, 09:10 PM)
ok let wait and see how..  drool.gif
*
Haha sure pal, hope this HD4830 can impress me since i might upgrade from my HD4670. And it will be nice if it dun need so many juice draw out from PSU, but still a lot of research and review after release that need to go thru before we conclude anything ya smile.gif
tech3910
post Oct 2 2008, 09:50 PM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE(Siu_Keong @ Oct 2 2008, 10:15 PM)
Haha sure pal, hope this HD4830 can impress me since i might upgrade from my HD4670. And it will be nice if it dun need so many juice draw out from PSU, but still a lot of research and review after release that need to go thru before we conclude anything ya smile.gif
*
so fast upgrade?
i tough u just got ur 4670?........ biggrin.gif
Siu_Keong
post Oct 2 2008, 09:58 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
218 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Bukit Jalil <-> Muar


QUOTE(tech3910 @ Oct 2 2008, 09:50 PM)
so fast upgrade?
i tough u just got ur 4670?........ biggrin.gif
*
Haha actually so far so good for my HIS HD4670 turbo card, i play DMC4 at high setting for my 24 inch still able to play it well. I said might but still not soon la, consider the price 1st. since my hometown pc can't play any game, so might consider place my 4670 to my hometown rig then i will upgrade lol. tongue.gif
alvinfks78
post Oct 2 2008, 11:20 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,127 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
Hi all,

Not trying to stop the flow of the topic but curious if anyone successfully run any brand 4670 with a normal RM 45-50 450 W PSU?

Cheers,

Alvin
cyew86
post Oct 2 2008, 11:23 PM

oh my ...
*******
Senior Member
4,251 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
well, typical answers here would be "better to get a better PSU to ensure longer lifespan of the components"
i am getting poisoned by those words, now i am considering to get FSP Blue Storm II 500W PSU to go with my HD4670

129 Pages « < 28 29 30 31 32 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0331sec    1.81    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 07:09 PM