the answer is non. all 2gb sticks will not do tight timings at more then 1000mhz without excessively insane voltage (like 2.6 or 2.7)

failing that,

how about goldfries edition rams? world fastest ddr2 rams lol!




Attached thumbnail(s)

i don't recall mid september has September Fools day. but would be nice if i can make $$$ out of RAM chips.

My previos KVR DDR667 stable OC E4400 @ 3.2GHz (320MHz*10, 2:3 Ratio), RAM running @ 960MHz

Someone is nuts on playing SPD

commonly performance ram had more low CL value than value ram, so the access time will be faster than value ram. But I didn't really feel much different between them.

maybe bcoz u're using Intel system which is frequency more effect compare to latency.if u're using an AMD,different story already.

Can you elaborate on this?

Yup I'd like to know why you say that too.

intel chips can overclock high FSB.high FSB needs high RAM frequency to cope wif the overclock.i believe the current C2D is fast becoz of the cache .high RAM frequency and high FSB assists the cache further.but intel platform need access the NB for the memory controller.thts latency already.intel is going for higher frequency in order to overcome the weakness in latency.
AMD chips cant clock the bus speed high.but AMD memory bandwidth much higher than intel now coz of built in memory controller inside the processor itself.Intel platform memory controller is inside the chipset.low latency much benefit AMD coz data need not access the NB for the memory controller (shorter path).

this is wat i understand from articles i read across the websites. correct me if i'm wrong.my english might not be perfect.

I'm not sure I understand.

You can find low latency memory and use it on Intel boards with better results compared to higher latency chips - thus low latency also improves performance on Intel chipsets.

The memory speed is also important because it determines how fast the cycle can be completed and the information delivered.

Hi All, currently i managed to get my proc oced to 2.88ghz (320 x9). So is there any different if i set my memory to 1:1 which is (640mhz) or as close to 800mhz as possible. In the bios i can set beyond 800mhz, if i set it will it overload my ram.

thanks

400 cannot ah boon? Why dont u up the Vcore? I not sure about E4600... I never had a C2D

Set your memory to as close to 800 as possible if you're going to stop at 320x9. If you're going to overclock further, leave it at 1:1 first.

my vcore (bios) already set at 1.35v, vcore idle is around 1.31 and vcore load is around 1.26-1.28v. the idle temp is 40c and full load in prime 95 can go up to 66c-68c. don't dare to set the vcore higher anymore....

Hmm those temps are a bit too hot for the Hyper 212. According to this chart it only loses to the CCF by 20%..so should be cooler. My QX@4.2Ghz loads at 60ish C.

I'd say reseat HSF or lapping time.

http://www.frostytech.com/articleview.cfm?...eid=2271&page=5

is there any different if i change my 667 value ram to performance ram?
2x2GB 667 change to 4 Crucial Ballistix Tracer DDR2 PC2-8500 1066MHz

when youre surfing and do word processing it deosnt feel any faster.
in gaming maybe.

Actually the difference isn't that much and hardly noticeable.

Performance RAM = marketing gimmick

hmm...many anot ?