Here let me help you puke some more.
http://www.flickr.com/groups/sigma10-20/pool/
D40/x/D60 Thread V4, The saga continues...
|
|
Sep 24 2008, 07:36 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,410 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: MLK |
War over already? Damn. Anyway, all wide angle will distort in a way or another. It's just that the Sigma distortion is so much that's it's almost fisheye. It's a love hate relationship. It's great for landscape but don't ler use it to shoot people. If you use any wide angle to shoot group photo the people at the edge will look phat. It's just the characteristic of an UWA lens. You can only fix it in Photoshop. If you're getting the Tokky it's fine but no need to kutuk Sigma blindly.
Here let me help you puke some more. http://www.flickr.com/groups/sigma10-20/pool/ |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 24 2008, 08:11 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,477 posts Joined: Feb 2005 |
use the distortion wisely.. it can create a great effect..
|
|
|
Sep 24 2008, 08:36 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,261 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
I used to have the Sigma 10-20mm. I can like/dislike the distortion. But it's just not sharp even if you use small apertures.
I am not judging the sharpness if I zoom in close to the photo. But by just fitting it onto my 15.4" laptop, it just looks not sharp. Now that I replaced it with a Tokina 12-24mm, I have no regrets. Well... maybe one... I want Tokina's 11-16mm f/2.8! |
|
|
Sep 24 2008, 09:38 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,889 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Kelana Jaya |
QUOTE(' or 1=1 -- @ Sep 24 2008, 01:24 AM) okay i did some googling of images from both lenses. the tokina looks very normal whereas the sigma is awesomely distorted. haha!! since i'm not a professional, so i don't have to make people look pretty in my photos. Meh you are better off with the 10.5mm fisheye thanks for the info, i might get this |
|
|
Sep 24 2008, 09:44 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
|
|
|
Sep 24 2008, 09:48 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,889 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Kelana Jaya |
Haha well he said he liked the distortion and I feel that if you want to distort, you go all the way
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 24 2008, 09:52 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
yerr... i never like fish eye
but then again, i never like wide angle. that's just me. the normal lens (50mm) or slightly longer (70mm) works best for me. |
|
|
Sep 24 2008, 10:09 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
I, too never like fish eye at first. But, that day friend bought. Play within 1 hour then it's in my list of getting
|
|
|
Sep 24 2008, 10:12 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,889 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Kelana Jaya |
I... never had a love/hate relationship with the fisheye. It was love all the way
|
|
|
Sep 24 2008, 10:34 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
21,256 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Pekopon |
|
|
|
Sep 24 2008, 10:51 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
182 posts Joined: Aug 2008 |
there are specific kind of lense for for specific kind of shots..how many type of lens r they actually?
|
|
|
Sep 24 2008, 10:58 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Sep 24 2008, 11:00 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
540 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Kuala Lumpur |
There's some serious UWA poison going on in the 10-20 flickr pool...
The love hate relationship for UWA and fish-eye is a good description. Some hate it, others love it. I hate it only 10% of the time Unfortunately, I also wish the Sigma would be sharper. It's quite cumbersome to sharpen my wide angle shots. But they're passable for me (trying to justify owning the lens here teehee), again some might want sharper lenses. Would love to get the fisheye as well, but the wallet is still reeling. Perhaps in the future. Shinchan, what do you use to shoot girls? |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 24 2008, 11:01 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,889 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Kelana Jaya |
|
|
|
Sep 24 2008, 11:04 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
540 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(zsuperc @ Sep 24 2008, 10:51 AM) there are specific kind of lense for for specific kind of shots..how many type of lens r they actually? Ah... quite difficult to answer.If we are talking about range & ssuming APS-C sensor: <10.5mm - usually fisheye 10-16 - usually ultra-wide angle 16-70 - the standard zoom >70 - telephoto (some might categorize >200mm as super telephoto, but I just bundle everything in) macro lenses can fall between 55-150mm (macro lenses are usually characterized by their extreme close focusing distance and also magnification instead of range, hence the diverse coverage) portraits are usually >70mm (but some use the 10-20 & fisheye for unique, weird shots) landscape lenses usually fall into the fisheye & UWA group (but some use a long zoom to pick out details or isolate certain landscape features) walkaround lenses usually the standard zoom (but some folks use UWA lenses too) Remember, only valid for APS-C. Full-frame cameras have different range (e.g. 17mm is considered UWA already). This post has been edited by ebernie: Sep 24 2008, 11:08 AM |
|
|
Sep 24 2008, 11:15 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
21,256 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Pekopon |
QUOTE(zsuperc @ Sep 24 2008, 10:51 AM) there are specific kind of lense for for specific kind of shots..how many type of lens r they actually? http://www.nikon.com.my/products.php?categoryid=18 |
|
|
Sep 24 2008, 11:36 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
182 posts Joined: Aug 2008 |
what r these lens for?
fisheye? ultra wide? standard zoom? telefoto? makro? erk..ada lagi ka? oh ya....ada tak lens yg gabungkan zoom dan wide lens skali?erm..is tis a dumb question? sorry..still learning This post has been edited by zsuperc: Sep 24 2008, 11:39 AM |
|
|
Sep 24 2008, 11:42 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,889 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Kelana Jaya |
|
|
|
Sep 24 2008, 11:57 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
182 posts Joined: Aug 2008 |
hmm..how much will tat cost? new n used
Added on September 24, 2008, 12:07 pmerm..wat r the difference between the Nikkor DX lenses compared to other Nikkor lenses? This post has been edited by zsuperc: Sep 24 2008, 12:07 PM |
|
|
Sep 24 2008, 12:31 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,443 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Bandar Baru Bangi |
fisheyeeee
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0271sec
0.67
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 11:58 AM |