Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
151 Pages « < 23 24 25 26 27 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 D40/x/D60 Thread V4, The saga continues...

views
     
Darkcursed
post Sep 11 2008, 10:45 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
435 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: KL Kepong


QUOTE(KTCY @ Sep 11 2008, 10:42 PM)
What flash you using ?
*
sb800
KTCY
post Sep 11 2008, 10:48 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
Can la. You choose SU-4 pr something than you pop up your flash then it will automatic trigger already blush.gif

This post has been edited by KTCY: Sep 11 2008, 10:48 PM
Darkcursed
post Sep 11 2008, 10:50 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
435 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: KL Kepong


QUOTE(KTCY @ Sep 11 2008, 10:48 PM)
Can la. You choose SU-4 pr something than you pop up your flash then it will automatic trigger already blush.gif
*
omg it works!i love it!

thanks! laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif

This post has been edited by Darkcursed: Sep 11 2008, 10:51 PM
KTCY
post Sep 11 2008, 10:53 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
It works but not easy to control the flash from camera as well as SB-800
Sometimes, it will too harsh sad.gif
Darkcursed
post Sep 11 2008, 11:41 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
435 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: KL Kepong


had a little try just now,is nice!!

user posted image
user posted image

i just notice that it will auto detect any light around 1,i was in my own room and i open light,it will auto fire also tongue.gif
ebernie
post Sep 11 2008, 11:50 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
540 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(ifer @ Sep 11 2008, 10:32 PM)
because these photographers do not have what we have today?

another thing, what are the qualities of those photographs that actually outshine?
*
Well, yeah, they didn't have what we have today. But it still does not change the fact that the photos looks much better than what we churn out by the dozens everyday.

What's better? Frankly, I think it's the attention to detail, the thought that is put into each photo, the planning that goes into each of them. Sometimes it's the fact that they were brave enough to be there to take pictures (world war pictures for example). But ultimately I think it was because each photo had a story to tell, and they told the story really well. But really, I can't do justice explaining the pictures. Heck, I can't even remember the names of all the photographers I think highly off.

They definitely did not:
1. Keep on snapping pictures of girls
2. Keep on showing off the lens' bokeh by shooting mundane stuff
KTCY
post Sep 11 2008, 11:55 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(Darkcursed @ Sep 11 2008, 11:41 PM)
had a little try just now,is nice!!
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

i just notice that it will auto detect any light around 1,i was in my own room and i open light,it will auto fire also  tongue.gif
*
Too harsh for photo 2 smile.gif
TSorenzai
post Sep 12 2008, 12:11 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,114 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(ebernie @ Sep 11 2008, 11:50 PM)
Well, yeah, they didn't have what we have today. But it still does not change the fact that the photos looks much better than what we churn out by the dozens everyday.

What's better? Frankly, I think it's the attention to detail, the thought that is put into each photo, the planning that goes into each of them. Sometimes it's the fact that they were brave enough to be there to take pictures (world war pictures for example). But ultimately I think it was because each photo had a story to tell, and they told the story really well. But really, I can't do justice explaining the pictures. Heck, I can't even remember the names of all the photographers I think highly off.

They definitely did not:
1. Keep on snapping pictures of girls
2. Keep on showing off the lens' bokeh by shooting mundane stuff
*
to simplify it:

"technology has spoilt us"

tongue.gif
' or 1=1 --
post Sep 12 2008, 12:22 AM

ayam sadding
******
Senior Member
1,443 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Bandar Baru Bangi


QUOTE(ebernie @ Sep 11 2008, 11:50 PM)
Well, yeah, they didn't have what we have today. But it still does not change the fact that the photos looks much better than what we churn out by the dozens everyday.

What's better? Frankly, I think it's the attention to detail, the thought that is put into each photo, the planning that goes into each of them. Sometimes it's the fact that they were brave enough to be there to take pictures (world war pictures for example). But ultimately I think it was because each photo had a story to tell, and they told the story really well. But really, I can't do justice explaining the pictures. Heck, I can't even remember the names of all the photographers I think highly off.

They definitely did not:
1. Keep on snapping pictures of girls
2. Keep on showing off the lens' bokeh by shooting mundane stuff
*
yeps can't have enough of that around. *pukes*
zio
post Sep 12 2008, 01:32 AM

RAWRR!
*******
Senior Member
4,889 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Kelana Jaya


Girls? Oh noes, I have a girl photo tongue.gif

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

4lt4ir
post Sep 12 2008, 02:25 AM

{--} 7
******
Senior Member
1,397 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
as always, those are excellent pictures zio smile.gif
' or 1=1 --
post Sep 12 2008, 04:19 AM

ayam sadding
******
Senior Member
1,443 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Bandar Baru Bangi


hoho!! good catch on the little girl and overall your photos are thumbup.gif
ifer
post Sep 12 2008, 08:38 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,637 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(ebernie @ Sep 11 2008, 11:50 PM)
Well, yeah, they didn't have what we have today. But it still does not change the fact that the photos looks much better than what we churn out by the dozens everyday.

What's better? Frankly, I think it's the attention to detail, the thought that is put into each photo, the planning that goes into each of them. Sometimes it's the fact that they were brave enough to be there to take pictures (world war pictures for example). But ultimately I think it was because each photo had a story to tell, and they told the story really well. But really, I can't do justice explaining the pictures. Heck, I can't even remember the names of all the photographers I think highly off.

They definitely did not:
1. Keep on snapping pictures of girls
2. Keep on showing off the lens' bokeh by shooting mundane stuff
*
wait,
are you comparing robert kapa's works with your works or with anyone of the forummers here on lyn?

why don't you compare kapa's works with today's world press award winners' works?
darthbaboon
post Sep 12 2008, 08:39 AM

Dark Lord of the Sith
*******
Senior Member
2,063 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Tatooine


QUOTE(ebernie @ Sep 11 2008, 11:50 PM)
Well, yeah, they didn't have what we have today. But it still does not change the fact that the photos looks much better than what we churn out by the dozens everyday.

What's better? Frankly, I think it's the attention to detail, the thought that is put into each photo, the planning that goes into each of them. Sometimes it's the fact that they were brave enough to be there to take pictures (world war pictures for example). But ultimately I think it was because each photo had a story to tell, and they told the story really well. But really, I can't do justice explaining the pictures. Heck, I can't even remember the names of all the photographers I think highly off.
It's not really a fair comparison there.

Firstly, if you were a photographer *then*, it meant that your career somehow revolved around photography. Cameras were expensive and not widespread then. Cameras are so affordable *now* and having a DSLR camera in your hand *now* doesn't mean that you are a career photographer.

Secondly, you are comparing works of career photographers *then* to amaturish works that are all over *now*, for example to those posted in this forum. A right approach would be to compare what career photographers took *then* to what professional career photographers take *now*, not with LYN photographers. Who says career photographers *now* don't travel the world - to the furthest regions of the antartica, to the war torn African countries... you see those pictures still, just don't expect to find them here unless there's a Thom Hogan hiding among us somewhere. tongue.gif

Anyway, don't be so critical of LYN photogs. Even the photos we see in newspapers nowadays are crap, but they serve their purpose as an illustration. At the end of the day, everyone shoots what he/she enjoys.

Don't put a stigma that "shooting photos of models/girls are wrong"... look at shinchan and lotso's works - they shoot good model photos and are really out to improve their craft.


KTCY
post Sep 12 2008, 09:05 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
Please la. Why keep on continue the topic. Shouldn't it be D40/x/D60 discussion ? It's way way out of the discussion already sleep.gif doh.gif
ebernie
post Sep 12 2008, 09:14 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
540 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Kuala Lumpur


No, I am not comparing the work of career photogs of the past with the current ones. They are about the same in quality. Obviously the current pics are mostly in color and they are sharper, but seriously, sharpness and color rarely come into play when judging a picture, so long as it's not too blurry until I can't make anything out of it.

And I know better than to judge any photogs. Especially ones that do not do it for a living. But if I did, flickr has plenty of examples of ppl not doing this thing at work but produce mind blowing pics.

I guess my initial post was a reflection of how frustrated I am when some keeps on posting about gear. D3s and 70-200VRs are nice and all, but they don't make good pics.

I bet if I gave 'zio' another 105mm lens, he'd be able to produce good photos. Heck, his photos are compressed and resized already but because of how he captured emotions and told stories, generally I think his series has been the better works shown here. They definitely don't have to be pin-sharp.

Sorry for the last post. Back to the regular D40 channel from my side now tongue.gif
KTCY
post Sep 12 2008, 09:15 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
No more off topic after my post can ? blush.gif

A photos to share biggrin.gif

user posted image
kanz1986
post Sep 12 2008, 09:22 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
108 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


QUOTE(KTCY @ Sep 11 2008, 08:31 PM)
Tested something tongue.gif

user posted image
*
drool.gif drool.gif drool.gif drool.gif drool.gif

im soooo gonna get a sb800 ! ! ! btw guys, do ya think its better to get a sb800/sb900 ?..
darthbaboon
post Sep 12 2008, 09:27 AM

Dark Lord of the Sith
*******
Senior Member
2,063 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Tatooine


QUOTE(kanz1986 @ Sep 12 2008, 09:22 AM)
drool.gif  drool.gif  drool.gif  drool.gif  drool.gif

im soooo gonna get a sb800 ! ! ! btw guys, do ya think its better to get a sb800/sb900 ?..
*
If you have the budget and know how to fully utilize the functions and features of the SB-900, of course go for it! Just don't buy the SB-900 and use it as a self-defense weapon.

Hmmm... it actually might work... blinding the pursuers or potential burglars! tongue.gif
KTCY
post Sep 12 2008, 09:27 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(kanz1986 @ Sep 12 2008, 09:22 AM)
drool.gif  drool.gif  drool.gif  drool.gif  drool.gif

im soooo gonna get a sb800 ! ! ! btw guys, do ya think its better to get a sb800/sb900 ?..
*
Reason I don't get SB-900 is Sb-800 smaller but more powerful compare to SB-900. Tested and proven. Even the shop fellow told me so.
Besides Sb-900 get overheated quite easily smile.gif

Another photo to share. Playing with effect again.

user posted image

151 Pages « < 23 24 25 26 27 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0166sec    0.47    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 02:12 PM