QUOTE(KTCY @ Sep 11 2008, 10:42 PM)
sb800D40/x/D60 Thread V4, The saga continues...
D40/x/D60 Thread V4, The saga continues...
|
|
Sep 11 2008, 10:45 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
435 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: KL Kepong |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 11 2008, 10:48 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
Can la. You choose SU-4 pr something than you pop up your flash then it will automatic trigger already
This post has been edited by KTCY: Sep 11 2008, 10:48 PM |
|
|
Sep 11 2008, 10:50 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
435 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: KL Kepong |
|
|
|
Sep 11 2008, 10:53 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
It works but not easy to control the flash from camera as well as SB-800
Sometimes, it will too harsh |
|
|
Sep 11 2008, 11:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
435 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: KL Kepong |
had a little try just now,is nice!!
![]() ![]() i just notice that it will auto detect any light around 1,i was in my own room and i open light,it will auto fire also |
|
|
Sep 11 2008, 11:50 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
540 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(ifer @ Sep 11 2008, 10:32 PM) because these photographers do not have what we have today? Well, yeah, they didn't have what we have today. But it still does not change the fact that the photos looks much better than what we churn out by the dozens everyday.another thing, what are the qualities of those photographs that actually outshine? What's better? Frankly, I think it's the attention to detail, the thought that is put into each photo, the planning that goes into each of them. Sometimes it's the fact that they were brave enough to be there to take pictures (world war pictures for example). But ultimately I think it was because each photo had a story to tell, and they told the story really well. But really, I can't do justice explaining the pictures. Heck, I can't even remember the names of all the photographers I think highly off. They definitely did not: 1. Keep on snapping pictures of girls 2. Keep on showing off the lens' bokeh by shooting mundane stuff |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 11 2008, 11:55 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
|
|
|
Sep 12 2008, 12:11 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(ebernie @ Sep 11 2008, 11:50 PM) Well, yeah, they didn't have what we have today. But it still does not change the fact that the photos looks much better than what we churn out by the dozens everyday. to simplify it:What's better? Frankly, I think it's the attention to detail, the thought that is put into each photo, the planning that goes into each of them. Sometimes it's the fact that they were brave enough to be there to take pictures (world war pictures for example). But ultimately I think it was because each photo had a story to tell, and they told the story really well. But really, I can't do justice explaining the pictures. Heck, I can't even remember the names of all the photographers I think highly off. They definitely did not: 1. Keep on snapping pictures of girls 2. Keep on showing off the lens' bokeh by shooting mundane stuff "technology has spoilt us" |
|
|
Sep 12 2008, 12:22 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,443 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Bandar Baru Bangi |
QUOTE(ebernie @ Sep 11 2008, 11:50 PM) Well, yeah, they didn't have what we have today. But it still does not change the fact that the photos looks much better than what we churn out by the dozens everyday. yeps can't have enough of that around. *pukes*What's better? Frankly, I think it's the attention to detail, the thought that is put into each photo, the planning that goes into each of them. Sometimes it's the fact that they were brave enough to be there to take pictures (world war pictures for example). But ultimately I think it was because each photo had a story to tell, and they told the story really well. But really, I can't do justice explaining the pictures. Heck, I can't even remember the names of all the photographers I think highly off. They definitely did not: 1. Keep on snapping pictures of girls 2. Keep on showing off the lens' bokeh by shooting mundane stuff |
|
|
Sep 12 2008, 01:32 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,889 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Kelana Jaya |
Girls? Oh noes, I have a girl photo
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Sep 12 2008, 02:25 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,397 posts Joined: Sep 2006 |
as always, those are excellent pictures zio
|
|
|
Sep 12 2008, 04:19 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,443 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Bandar Baru Bangi |
hoho!! good catch on the little girl and overall your photos are
|
|
|
Sep 12 2008, 08:38 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(ebernie @ Sep 11 2008, 11:50 PM) Well, yeah, they didn't have what we have today. But it still does not change the fact that the photos looks much better than what we churn out by the dozens everyday. wait,What's better? Frankly, I think it's the attention to detail, the thought that is put into each photo, the planning that goes into each of them. Sometimes it's the fact that they were brave enough to be there to take pictures (world war pictures for example). But ultimately I think it was because each photo had a story to tell, and they told the story really well. But really, I can't do justice explaining the pictures. Heck, I can't even remember the names of all the photographers I think highly off. They definitely did not: 1. Keep on snapping pictures of girls 2. Keep on showing off the lens' bokeh by shooting mundane stuff are you comparing robert kapa's works with your works or with anyone of the forummers here on lyn? why don't you compare kapa's works with today's world press award winners' works? |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 12 2008, 08:39 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,063 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Tatooine |
QUOTE(ebernie @ Sep 11 2008, 11:50 PM) Well, yeah, they didn't have what we have today. But it still does not change the fact that the photos looks much better than what we churn out by the dozens everyday. It's not really a fair comparison there.What's better? Frankly, I think it's the attention to detail, the thought that is put into each photo, the planning that goes into each of them. Sometimes it's the fact that they were brave enough to be there to take pictures (world war pictures for example). But ultimately I think it was because each photo had a story to tell, and they told the story really well. But really, I can't do justice explaining the pictures. Heck, I can't even remember the names of all the photographers I think highly off. Firstly, if you were a photographer *then*, it meant that your career somehow revolved around photography. Cameras were expensive and not widespread then. Cameras are so affordable *now* and having a DSLR camera in your hand *now* doesn't mean that you are a career photographer. Secondly, you are comparing works of career photographers *then* to amaturish works that are all over *now*, for example to those posted in this forum. A right approach would be to compare what career photographers took *then* to what professional career photographers take *now*, not with LYN photographers. Who says career photographers *now* don't travel the world - to the furthest regions of the antartica, to the war torn African countries... you see those pictures still, just don't expect to find them here unless there's a Thom Hogan hiding among us somewhere. Anyway, don't be so critical of LYN photogs. Even the photos we see in newspapers nowadays are crap, but they serve their purpose as an illustration. At the end of the day, everyone shoots what he/she enjoys. Don't put a stigma that "shooting photos of models/girls are wrong"... look at shinchan and lotso's works - they shoot good model photos and are really out to improve their craft. |
|
|
Sep 12 2008, 09:05 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
Please la. Why keep on continue the topic. Shouldn't it be D40/x/D60 discussion ? It's way way out of the discussion already
|
|
|
Sep 12 2008, 09:14 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
540 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Kuala Lumpur |
No, I am not comparing the work of career photogs of the past with the current ones. They are about the same in quality. Obviously the current pics are mostly in color and they are sharper, but seriously, sharpness and color rarely come into play when judging a picture, so long as it's not too blurry until I can't make anything out of it.
And I know better than to judge any photogs. Especially ones that do not do it for a living. But if I did, flickr has plenty of examples of ppl not doing this thing at work but produce mind blowing pics. I guess my initial post was a reflection of how frustrated I am when some keeps on posting about gear. D3s and 70-200VRs are nice and all, but they don't make good pics. I bet if I gave 'zio' another 105mm lens, he'd be able to produce good photos. Heck, his photos are compressed and resized already but because of how he captured emotions and told stories, generally I think his series has been the better works shown here. They definitely don't have to be pin-sharp. Sorry for the last post. Back to the regular D40 channel from my side now |
|
|
Sep 12 2008, 09:15 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
No more off topic after my post can ?
A photos to share ![]() |
|
|
Sep 12 2008, 09:22 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
108 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
Sep 12 2008, 09:27 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,063 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Tatooine |
QUOTE(kanz1986 @ Sep 12 2008, 09:22 AM) If you have the budget and know how to fully utilize the functions and features of the SB-900, of course go for it! Just don't buy the SB-900 and use it as a self-defense weapon.Hmmm... it actually might work... blinding the pursuers or potential burglars! |
|
|
Sep 12 2008, 09:27 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(kanz1986 @ Sep 12 2008, 09:22 AM) Reason I don't get SB-900 is Sb-800 smaller but more powerful compare to SB-900. Tested and proven. Even the shop fellow told me so.Besides Sb-900 get overheated quite easily Another photo to share. Playing with effect again. ![]() |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0166sec
0.47
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 02:12 PM |