Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
134 Pages « < 129 130 131 132 133 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

DIY T-Amp user/diyer come here :), TA2024 complete build board diy

views
     
Y.C.
post Nov 13 2008, 03:32 PM

Casual listener
*****
Senior Member
906 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


Jazzy,
Both Lai and I are using the same SMPS as yours with our main T-amps now (we heard how good it is during our first t/t session). It sure is excellent stuff with 4.2A on tap and its DC voltage could be increased to 14V max. Even at 12V setting now, it sounded so much better than my other SMPS – less flat-sounding and less tiring over long period of listening with ample of reserves when demanded upon. I only took 1 shot with my mobile phone - no close ups.


Monkey King,
I’ve just commented positively on the Meanwell S-50-12 SMPS. Perhaps you may like to consider getting it although it’s slightly more expensive over others.


March,
Both Lai and I thought the Vishay MKT1813 2.2uF caps are fabulous sounding (although we have not experiment with many), the sound quality of these caps surpassing that of the highly raved Vishay MKT1822 2.2uF (green square caps) in our 2nd T-amps. You heard them (in Lai’s T-amp) during our first t/t. The lack of power was due to type of SMPS used then.

cyl1000
post Nov 13 2008, 03:33 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
74 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(Y.C. @ Nov 13 2008, 11:08 AM)
I’d say this thread is very alive.

A quick update from my end here: Since I have 2 T-amps but only 1 computer-notebook-style SMPS, I need to get another and had originally wanted to spend RM33 for a similar unit. However, Lai convinced and bought for me a Meanwell S-50-12 SMPS instead. The difference in sonic quality is very substantial and the additional RM22 spent is well-worth it.

Coincidentally, size (width and depth) of the Meanwell SMPS is identical to casing of my 1st T-amp and looks very much the PSU specially made for my T-amp.

A pix:
*
I'm using a 5Amp SMPS adaptor. Since it is still a stocked t-amp, can't comment much. For those using caged type SMPS, please be extra careful to avoid eletric shock smile.gif
Y.C.
post Nov 13 2008, 03:40 PM

Casual listener
*****
Senior Member
906 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


Name of shop = Online Components S/B

CYL, Thanks, I tested my unit with a test pen and found no current leakage on the cage. However, we do need to be careful with the screw-on connectors behind. For extra precaution, we could consider housing them in plastic casings. smile.gif



jazzy939
post Nov 13 2008, 04:35 PM

reel is real
*******
Senior Member
8,186 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Beaumont, Baile Ath Cliath, EIRE.



There is a GROUND connection at the SMPS. It's there for a purpose.. wink.gif
The mains ground wire is connected to this point.
Also the SMPS mounting is isolated from the metal casing. SAFETY FIRST!

QUOTE(Y.C. @ Nov 13 2008, 03:40 PM)
Name of shop = Online Components S/B

CYL, Thanks, I tested my unit with a test pen and found no current leakage on the cage. However, we do need to be careful with the screw-on connectors behind. For extra precaution, we could consider housing them in plastic casings.  smile.gif
*
This post has been edited by jazzy939: Nov 13 2008, 06:26 PM
Monkey King
post Nov 13 2008, 07:18 PM

Autoparts Trader
******
Senior Member
1,093 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: SETAPAK, KL




so this is the one ?

user posted image

This post has been edited by Monkey King: Nov 13 2008, 07:19 PM
Y.C.
post Nov 13 2008, 08:10 PM

Casual listener
*****
Senior Member
906 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


Go for Meanwell SMPS model S-50-12 and you would not go wrong.

QUOTE(Monkey King @ Nov 13 2008, 07:18 PM)
so this is the one ?
*


Najmods
post Nov 13 2008, 09:45 PM

*mutter mutter mutter mutter*
*******
Senior Member
5,211 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Konohana


A bit of update on my T-Amp. My final mod to it is I put two 3300uF high quality Rubycon MBZ in series (totalling 1650uF) on power input, I don't think I need the enormous 10000uF like Senior did. I even try several values of tank caps up to 690uF (470+220), finally I settled at 440uF (220uF stock paralled with 220uF Rubycon caps)

After it reaches 20-ish burn-in hour, it started to sound different a little bit. No longer harsh like before, its smooth the high a little bit. Even though my current amp is without buffer unlike Senior did, but I like it sound to be a bit dry, for me its better to be dry than been surrounded by bass since my room is small

Oh, I forgot, I powered my T-Amp with my computer PSU, all 33A continuous current available on 12V rail at my disposal laugh.gif It sounded great, with no noise whatsoever, except if I play games when the PSU is been loaded, but I minimize it with enabling Vsync (limiting framerate to vertical refresh rate of the monitor). Something on my graphic card generating that noise, most modern mid to high end cards develop that annoying noise when in 3D games
Y.C.
post Nov 14 2008, 05:33 PM

Casual listener
*****
Senior Member
906 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


Thanks for sharing, Najmods.

I had mentioned that my T-amp with use of Meanwell S-50-12 SMPS sounded substantially better than with computer-notebook-style SMPS. In what manner? The sound becomes fuller, more 3 dimensional (less flat-sounding) and the amplifier behaves like a real 50 watter instead of a mere 20 watter. thumbup.gif



This post has been edited by Y.C.: Nov 18 2008, 12:54 PM
TSxtorm
post Nov 14 2008, 06:50 PM

^O....OO.....ooo^
*******
Senior Member
3,160 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KLANG!
so much different, planing to get the smps too next time im nearby. passed few days was there but work till 5++ which i thik not a good time anymore, dont wana reach office at 8...hahaha


bsl555
post Nov 14 2008, 07:54 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,046 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


Hmmm, I had a close look at some Meanwell models at one shop today. Just ok ok lah. Anyway, I've a feeling the 50W SMPS for your T-Amp is insufficent current, but bare minimum. You should think that the T-Amp would prefer power supply from something like a car battery (60Ampere hour) where its got ample DC current on tap.

This post has been edited by bsl555: Nov 14 2008, 07:56 PM
Y.C.
post Nov 14 2008, 08:42 PM

Casual listener
*****
Senior Member
906 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


Thanks, bsl smile.gif

The wiki of diyAudio.com (http://www.diyaudio.com/wiki/index.php?page=Class+D+Amplification) states that 3A – 5A regulated supply is typically aplenty as the T-amps only draw about 300mA with a musical signal, with many speakers. Even when a battery is to be used, its recommended amperage-hour is 7Ah. Why do you feel a need for such high current of 60Ah for the T-amps?



bsl555
post Nov 14 2008, 09:04 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,046 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


Its impossible the Tripath chip draws 300mA with musical signal. Musical signal consists of wide frequency changes and the current draw will vary with the music where there's bass and large volume change, something like what you notice on a VU meter. 60AHour is the rated battery capacity and obviously there's ample current on tap. Of course the amp won't draw the full amount, even the car headlights won't draw that much. The fact remains that a car battery have ample current capacity and will not compromise the potential of the T-amp.
jazzy939
post Nov 14 2008, 09:05 PM

reel is real
*******
Senior Member
8,186 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Beaumont, Baile Ath Cliath, EIRE.



Y.C.,
I am with you. The Class D(Class T incase of Tripath) amplification is of high efficiency design(90%, 10W @ 8 ohm)), infact 1A is already aplenty. And our 50W SMPS is way overboard! laugh.gif
But I have a reason for that. The same SMPS will also powers my pre-amp and also for bi-amping. wink.gif


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
TSxtorm
post Nov 14 2008, 11:26 PM

^O....OO.....ooo^
*******
Senior Member
3,160 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KLANG!
jazzy, your quotable quote are getting nice and long tongue.gif

Ongbs measure it before, max was still under 2 amp i think, driving his 3x8" floor stander
Y.C.
post Nov 15 2008, 02:19 AM

Casual listener
*****
Senior Member
906 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


I’m sure bsl meant well. He has always been stressing the importance of having adequate power supplies for phono preamps and now the T-amp.

I’d fully agree that the TA2024 chip does not only draw 300mA constantly with musical signal all the time as very loud and complex music passages with lots of bass will definitely draw more current. And with difficult load loudspeakers (their impedances dipping very low), the T-amp will require even more current. Question is, is 4.2A of Meanwell SMPS really insufficient? Jazzy seems to think otherwise and Xtorm quoted a measurement by Ongbs before.

My take is, with the T-amp driving medium sensitivity loudspeakers of benign loads and music not being played to headbanging levels, 4.2A should be sufficient. I could be wrong though. Powering the T-amp with a car battery may be a costly affair and it (the battery) needs regular charging too.


jazzy939
post Nov 15 2008, 07:10 AM

reel is real
*******
Senior Member
8,186 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Beaumont, Baile Ath Cliath, EIRE.



Yes, surely he was and thank you for your timely reminders and pointers bsl! thumbup.gif

Y.C.,
you may have a point there, and the T-Amp will more likely to go into clipping and drain more power hence the emphasis on high efficiency speakers wink.gif

I do have a 'spare' car battery around somewhere.. may try it out and see(hear) if there would any difference in the sonics.. my gut feeling say it would be most probably in the low band/frequencies region... depend on your equipments also. I would say the choice on the type of PS is more on personal preferences and conveniences...

I have two more types of caps to try out.. so it's a good excuse to open up the casing and at the same time try out the car battery.. brows.gif
Will revert if I have the chance to do it, maybe tonite.. biggrin.gif




QUOTE(Y.C. @ Nov 15 2008, 02:19 AM)
I’m sure bsl meant well. He has always been stressing the importance of having adequate power supplies for phono preamps and now the T-amp.

......

My take is, with the T-amp driving medium sensitivity loudspeakers of benign loads and music not being played to headbanging levels, 4.2A should be sufficient. I could be wrong though. Powering the T-amp with a car battery may be a costly affair and it (the battery) needs regular charging too.
*
March05
post Nov 15 2008, 07:51 AM

Certified Lowyat.NUT
*******
Senior Member
2,171 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Subang Jaya



QUOTE(jazzy939 @ Nov 15 2008, 07:10 AM)
I have two more types of caps to try out.. so it's a good excuse to open up the casing and at the same time try out the car battery..  brows.gif
Looks like we may even delve into which car battery drives the T-amp better! It has been my intention all along to drive my T-amp off batteries ....anyway, I use batteries extensively to keep some equipment isolated from the unreliable mains. Because I want to stay portable with the TA2024, this is also a natural path for me to take (KISS!).

Perhaps at the next TT session, we can do a comparison, eh?
jazzy939
post Nov 15 2008, 09:00 AM

reel is real
*******
Senior Member
8,186 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Beaumont, Baile Ath Cliath, EIRE.



bro March,
That is a great idea! wink.gif
Yes, on the next TT Session, it would be interesting to know as such. We'll call it Battle Of The Lead Acids! tongue.gif
Anyway, I can barely remember something on a certain types(brand name) of lead acid batteries that sounded better than some other brands.. no not the batt sounded better, the equipment that is! laugh.gif (pagi2 punya joke) I think its a certain type/brand of SLAs that they were using for the T-Amp.. So, would there be differences between SLAs and CAR BATT? ohmy.gif

I am keen also to find out as my current buffer preamp is running off a 9V batt. It sounded 'clean' and 'crisp' and I am wondering,'what if the T-Amp is also batt powered?" hmm.gif
Bro March, you should compare the passive pre and this buffer pre. wink.gif

So, next best questions are, TT Session, when and where? rolleyes.gif

QUOTE(March05 @ Nov 15 2008, 07:51 AM)
Looks like we may even delve into which car battery drives the T-amp better! It has been my intention all along to drive my T-amp off batteries ....anyway, I use batteries extensively to keep some equipment isolated from the unreliable mains. Because I want to stay portable with the TA2024, this is also a natural path for me to take (KISS!).

Perhaps at the next TT session, we can do a comparison, eh?
*
March05
post Nov 15 2008, 09:56 AM

Certified Lowyat.NUT
*******
Senior Member
2,171 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Subang Jaya



QUOTE(jazzy939 @ Nov 15 2008, 09:00 AM)
Bro March, you should compare the passive pre and this buffer pre. wink.gif
*
jazzy bro, I have this unerring inkling sooner or later, I will. biggrin.gif

But I think I'm getting an overdose of equipment at the moment....new T-amps, passive preamp, the newly modded CA640P with ultra-beefed up PSU (thanks to bsl555), my HB2 is back in the system (but one tweeter is definitely in the pits, it's ringing like hell), and I'm still finetuning the GyroDec.....my heart can't take it anymore. Not to mention, the Philips SHE9850 IEM is now settling quite nicely and pulling me totally in a different direction - IEMs are so antisocial, right?

Anyway, I will do a bit of comparing between a 7 aH SLA battery and a 60 aH SLA car battery with the TA2024 in stock form first, since these are at hand.
bsl555
post Nov 15 2008, 11:30 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,046 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


March05: I could have passed you some length of domestic electrical wiring cable if you've said you have intention of using battery for the T-amp. The cables would do good for sure.

134 Pages « < 129 130 131 132 133 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0190sec    0.31    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 05:34 PM