Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

34 Pages « < 28 29 30 31 32 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Official R700 (A.K.A HD 4870 X2) discuss section

views
     
kurtkob78
post Sep 9 2008, 05:15 AM

Do your best
*******
Senior Member
3,833 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: Shah Alam


colabear, did u OC anything from your system to get that 3dmark score
aLWAYStHEsAME
post Sep 9 2008, 06:42 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
336 posts

Joined: Oct 2007



QUOTE(kurtkob78 @ Sep 9 2008, 05:15 AM)
colabear, did u OC anything from your system to get that 3dmark score
*
He already stated there bro

QUOTE
Tried Q9550(E0) and clocked it to 4ghz and benched with 3dmarks06 (Currently on P5Q Deluxe while my Rampage is resting)

Gamer
post Sep 9 2008, 11:38 AM

Be Original
*******
Senior Member
3,366 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sarawak, Sibu


that called CrossFireX
onitears
post Sep 10 2008, 12:04 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
66 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
after oc the vantage score really got improve abit
aih it's time to get another U le
aLWAYStHEsAME
post Sep 10 2008, 01:22 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
336 posts

Joined: Oct 2007



So, U already overclock ur processor? What u mean by 'U'? blink.gif
onitears
post Sep 10 2008, 11:51 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
66 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
U is processor hehe
using amd mobo
dunno which phenom should go to
scoponoc
post Sep 11 2008, 08:11 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
16 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


there will be asus 4870x2 top..hope cooling system will be customize better..
onitears
post Sep 11 2008, 09:43 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
66 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
i check my 4870x2 with gpu-z
first gpu show 12.0Gpixel/s of pixel fillrate
30.0GTexel/s of texture fillrate
second gpu show 8.1Gpixel/s of pixel fillrate
20.3GTexel/s of texture fillrate
both r different,is it normal?
jinaun
post Sep 11 2008, 11:12 PM

where are my stars???
Group Icon
Elite
6,139 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(onitears @ Sep 11 2008, 09:43 PM)
i check my 4870x2 with gpu-z
first gpu show 12.0Gpixel/s of pixel fillrate
                    30.0GTexel/s of texture fillrate
second gpu show 8.1Gpixel/s of pixel fillrate
                          20.3GTexel/s of texture fillrate
both r different,is it normal?
*
most likely the higher ones are the master GPU which drives your display... while the lower ones are the slave GPU
scoponoc
post Sep 11 2008, 11:30 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
16 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


from my reading these 2 GPU work separately.thats showed by 256bit for each gpu,not sum of all.graphics process will boost in different rate on these 2 unequal GPU.there will be a new driver to link these 2 GPU thus will show almost the same value in all process.
thats wht i understand.correct me if wrong
onitears
post Sep 12 2008, 05:01 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
66 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
ic....
but as i notice the second gpu no fully use all the time in gaming

PhantomThief
post Sep 12 2008, 12:58 PM

I'm folding. Are you?
Group Icon
Elite
696 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Melaka



Quick question for you guys with the 4870X2. What heatsink/coolers work with the card? Since I've heard that the Russian government is considering using the cards as room heaters throughout their nation.
xpresside
post Sep 12 2008, 01:00 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,982 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: TTDI


QUOTE(PhantomThief @ Sep 12 2008, 12:58 PM)
Quick question for you guys with the 4870X2. What heatsink/coolers work with the card? Since I've heard that the Russian government is considering using the cards as room heaters throughout their nation.
*
lame joke
if u know about 3870x2, it goes the same for 4870x2...3rd party manufacturers are too lazy to design 1 for x2 cards

This post has been edited by xpresside: Sep 12 2008, 01:02 PM
PhantomThief
post Sep 12 2008, 01:03 PM

I'm folding. Are you?
Group Icon
Elite
696 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Melaka



QUOTE(xpresside @ Sep 12 2008, 01:00 PM)
lame joke
if u know about 3870x2, it goes the same for 4870x2...3rd party manufacturers are too lazy to design 1 for x2 cards
*
Not a joke, just implying that the card runs hot in an unconventional manner. I don't know much about ATI, because I've never had one of their cards before. But thanks for the answer.
xpresside
post Sep 12 2008, 01:06 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,982 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: TTDI


QUOTE(PhantomThief @ Sep 12 2008, 01:03 PM)
Not a joke, just implying that the card runs hot in an unconventional manner. I don't know much about ATI, because I've never had one of their cards before. But thanks for the answer.
*
altho it's hot......it wont melt the card
if u dont like it just adjust the fan abit, no need for add on cooler unless u oc
Moogle Stiltzkin
post Sep 12 2008, 01:33 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,474 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
bruce.gif

This post has been edited by Moogle Stiltzkin: Jul 14 2017, 06:21 PM
Jimsee
post Sep 12 2008, 02:55 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
341 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: Ipoh



guys. Do u think 700WATT Cool Master Realpower should be enough to run 4870x2 ?

My Specs
Chipset :Q6600 2.4ghz,
RAM :2x Kingston DDR2 KVR800 RAM
Graphic Card :MSI 9800GTX (Non - Overclock) - currently using blush.gif
Motherboard :MSI MS7512 Platinum(CF)
PSU :Cooler master-Real Power Plus 700wat
OS : Window XP SP2



This post has been edited by Jimsee: Sep 12 2008, 03:08 PM
scoponoc
post Sep 12 2008, 07:09 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
16 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(Jimsee @ Sep 12 2008, 02:55 PM)
guys. Do u think 700WATT Cool Master Realpower should be enough to run 4870x2 ?

My Specs
Chipset :Q6600 2.4ghz,
RAM :2x Kingston DDR2 KVR800 RAM
Graphic Card :MSI 9800GTX (Non - Overclock) - currently using blush.gif
Motherboard :MSI MS7512 Platinum(CF)
PSU :Cooler master-Real Power Plus 700wat
OS : Window XP SP2
*
enough...but have to consider ur hardisk quantity..
xpresside
post Sep 12 2008, 08:01 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,982 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: TTDI


QUOTE(Moogle Stiltzkin @ Sep 12 2008, 01:33 PM)
The new ati HD 4870X2 is a good card and probably edges the Nvidia G280 a bit.

But think about it. The Nvidia is a single card, whereas the Ati is basically 2 cards into 1 because it is doing cross fire internally.

What this means is, it will require more driver support in order to make use of the Ati 2 GPUs for games ....

This is why although the ATI is good, i just don't trust driver support to last as long as i would like ..... which is why i am more inclinded towards the Nvidia G280 now that prices have become more reasonably and competitive once Ati brought out their card.

However for me i have a Nvidia 8800 GTS, so i don't feel it is yet the right time for me to upgrade because DirectX11 is coming soon ? Also the performance increase i don't think is that much with the current latest graphics cards.

The only benefit is Crysis would be playable if i used either the new ATI or Nvidia at high settings on a 1900x1200 resolution on my 24'' monitor.

I prefer to wait as well to see Nvidia's next generation graphics card to out compete the ATI since they've gained the upper hand by a bit in delivering a better competitive product.
*
wait wait wait
dx11 is 2010 doh.gif and backward compatible

QUOTE
Sooner Than You Think
While the final bits for DirectX 11 are targeted to ship with the first version of Windows 7, Microsoft will be delivering a preview version of the API as early as November, 2008. At that time, we'll have a better gauge of which features will actually make the cut. But we won't get a full picture until the Windows 7 timeframe, which is likely to be sometime in 2010 (though betas may appear in 2009).


http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,2845,2329314,00.asp
look at is this way...we have dx10 cards but majority of games are on dx9
"soon" dx11 comes out AND WAT DO WE HAVE? games majority will be on dx10

This post has been edited by xpresside: Sep 12 2008, 08:05 PM
PhantomThief
post Sep 12 2008, 08:04 PM

I'm folding. Are you?
Group Icon
Elite
696 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Melaka



QUOTE(xpresside @ Sep 12 2008, 08:01 PM)
wait wait wait
dx11 is 2010  doh.gif
*
Not just that, even DX10 is barely utilised. DX10.1 is even worse off. DX11 is a long way to go. But other than that, sound plan. I am also looking forward to nvidia's next releases. A die-shrinked GTX280 would be fearful indeed. Good times for video cards, there's some real competition going on.

34 Pages « < 28 29 30 31 32 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0197sec    0.52    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 12:25 PM