QUOTE(defaultname365 @ Jan 4 2010, 05:41 AM)
As the movie producer put it "Avatar is not a movie you can talk about. You have to experience it yourself."
very very true,
its made with 3D foremost in mind (read EMPIRE on JC's 'avatar' long before the movie came out)
unfortunately for me they (JC team) spend so much time in 3D development that it kinda thin out the fish from bone. (on that score even star wars had better & they edge it with 'outer world' gadgets, 'other world aliens' development)
yes to many; movie appears spectacular & yes it shd watched be in 3D. i missed it, i wasted watching it in non 3D mainly because it was bloody booked out day after day. btw this 3D was mention "mother-of-all 3D" , "groundbreaking" so it's not suppose to compare other 3D's
story to me appears ho-hum, character developement (sadly) is almost secondary, JC tried as much as he can i guess but as mentioned he spend alot of developing avatar's 3D/CGI. well, today's young moviesgoers place so much into CGI; that it places way way above evoking a spirit of proper moviedom (at least for me)
I have mentioned; go watch avatar-in-3D, there you fully understand the length that JC had bet on. (he mentioned at length in EMPIRE)
dwelling other possiblities of how they should remove the Na'vi's (gassing, digging underground), well then there is no movie then
This post has been edited by koolspyda: Jan 4 2010, 04:42 PM