On Moderator, I think thewhacker is one of the fairest moderator out there..but too bad he posted not that frequently
and on bro alien, i think he is doing great at the moment, providing informative articles to other thread not only in Man utd thread..is there any problems with that?

Won't it be better if moderator pm to warn 1st before issuing a warning that disable 3 days posting?

In the heat of the moment, you never explained. Thus you can't blame ppl for suspecting you.
You should have cleared the air the first time you posted but it was until whaker posted than we knew the actual situation. But than damage had been done.

Anyway, let bygone be bygone.

Disable for 3 days equal to ban, no?

Hey alien. I've got a point here. You see, rules are dead and they arent flexible. You see Jonno used the word **** on Ronaldo but did he do that with an ill intention? No. Try talking with fans from overseas. Most of them will use nicks on player. Eg: That ******* dived again. The piece of crap missed an open goal. The ref is shit. Jonno made his sentence (the **** sentence) in good manner you see. He did not went to Manutd thread and shout 'Ronaldo is a ****!!'. I personally find it more annoyed when I see a rival fan come into my thread and post " We beat you in your turf. Thanks for the title" rather than "Cesc that *******" in their own thread.
Judge on intention. Not word.

look here guys.

if you have a LEGAL word to use. why use **** ?

clearly it's not a healthy word. so clearly using it means you're being "unhealthy" in a supposedly healthy discussion of an interesting sport.

that's it. simple as that. if you think your **** can be argued as "it can be anything", then we're going to assume it's a vulgar word. your word against yourself.

In that moment of heat, I am not sure if the timing is right since at that time I was the most hated person in the thread.
Disable posting only means one cannot post BUT will still able to login to the forum.

Right, judge by intention and not word. I quoted what goldfries said that time:

http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopi...post&p=16249992

I dont think you get my point. Like I've said, he do not have any intention to annoy the ManU fans and he did it in a well mannered. Its not like everything has to go by the books.

It's not about intention. It's the fact that the word shouldn't be used! That's the point alien's trying to make.

I've been using the words for my last 2 post. Why din you guys say anything bout me? Its the intention that counts dude. Its already been a custom of name calling in football.

I'm not shooting at anyone. I'm saying if one can claim one moderator to be biased and all; if he got certain affiliation whereby he professed his loyalty to the club, there's bound to be claims that one is biased. It's known as conflict of interest.

So when you guys wanted solutions; isn't that the best solution?

---

Added on March 25, 2008, 11:56 pmAs explained, it was a warning. But due to mixed up; the account was disabled for posting instead by the staffs.
And one can always view the warning he got for and by whom by pointing his cursor over the warning bar.

Disable for 3 days equal to ban, no?

Hey alien. I've got a point here. You see, rules are dead and they arent flexible. You see Jonno used the word **** on Ronaldo but did he do that with an ill intention? No. Try talking with fans from overseas. Most of them will use nicks on player. Eg: That ******* dived again. The piece of crap missed an open goal. The ref is shit. Jonno made his sentence (the **** sentence) in good manner you see. He did not went to Manutd thread and shout 'Ronaldo is a ****!!'. I personally find it more annoyed when I see a rival fan come into my thread and post " We beat you in your turf. Thanks for the title" rather than "Cesc that *******" in their own thread.
Judge on intention. Not word.

Even though it is LYN forum , the thread itself belongs to the clubs.As for those kiddo who posted "glory glory Man Utd" at least should get punishment, right?Deleting posts is not going to help much...The warning which disable the posting option should be given.

In that moment of heat, I am not sure if the timing is right since at that time I was the most hated person in the thread.
Disable posting only means one cannot post BUT will still able to login to the forum.

Right, judge by intention and not word. I quoted what goldfries said that time:

http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopi...post&p=16249992

Mods job is not to post information or articles alright?

Even though it is LYN forum , the thread itself belongs to the clubs.As for those kiddo who posted "glory glory Man Utd" at least should get punishment, right?Deleting posts is not going to help much...The warning which disable the posting option should be given.

Although I'm a Man Utd fans myself, I second that.Once bitten twice shy.Getting suitable punishment should be able to decrease such kind of flame baiting post especially in arch rival's thread.

Yet, there are still problems like creating a new account.Moderator should take a deep look into this issue.

P.s: I have a strong feeling that Ken= Fernando because everytime 1 log off..the other one login=.=pls check

It's the other way round. Even if it's a United thread, it's under LYN. Want free flowing four letter words? Head over to United Rant or the RedCafe. I must admit Cafe is of a higher class than some of the other forums I do visit (not taking a swipe at LYN).

Yet, there are still problems like creating a new account.Moderator should take a deep look into this issue.

P.s: I have a strong feeling that Ken= Fernando because everytime 1 log off..the other one login=.=pls check

As for such, it is really solely depends on individual whether they know the word called RESPECT or not..

As for duplicate acc, we can only alert the admins when we see one since there is no way to monitor all of them. Although a few of the dup. account has been banned during the "war" last week.

p/s: I am quite sure that's not the case for your p.s statement

the warning is juz like temporary ban which resulted in 3 days disable in posting..i mean literally warning should be given via pm instead of the 10% warning..

All warnings will increase the meter by 10% for each warning given but percentage do not dictate suspensions time. You may be warned several times for minor offenses before suspensions is given but receive a suspension for just making a serious offense. All warnings will expire 6 months after it was issued. Warning prunes are done automatically by a script which runs on the first day of each month only. As such, if your warning was due to end on the 3rd of February for example, it will only be removed on the 1st of March. As of 21st March 2006, all warn prunes will reduce your meter by 10%, but the logs will remain.