Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Discussion **Football Lounge Rules and Regulations**, What Do You Think Of It? Not Strict or?

views
     
b00n
post Mar 25 2008, 11:31 PM

delusional
Group Icon
VIP
9,137 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Wouldn't be around much, pls PM other mods.
I've advised not to bring up this matter again and yet this thread is created for nothing.

Damage had been done and issue had since gotten quiet.
The seriousness or the actual displeasure is the messed up situation whereby Jonno was banned by the mods because of mis communication; and apology was not given by mr alien or the actual staff that took the wrong action.

There's many in LYN which gets warning every now and there and the seniors would tell you it's no big deals. When one continues to make a big thing about this since everyone is letting time goes by, it's seem too much and it's getting childish and raising unwanted tensions around.

Just let the matter rest. I think kobe is right in the sense that this had turned into childish sour grape action.

Anyway, pls close this thread and inform the mod to invincible or delete it. It really serves no purpose.
b00n
post Mar 25 2008, 11:41 PM

delusional
Group Icon
VIP
9,137 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Wouldn't be around much, pls PM other mods.
QUOTE(J-Piggy @ Mar 25 2008, 11:33 PM)
It somehow is meant for changing the current football lounge..and some people just mentioned about old cases and some even dropby to counter attack...If mod see it serves no purpose, they can close it...but i think solutions are needed to overcome the riots, eh?
*

Damage had been done and things are getting into places.
Ask around and you'll noticed that fans goes into each other thread. Some posted craps but some posted some insights.
It always had been like that. The intensity arises because of a flaming war between dream and shgk. The mod probably took a shot at anybody offending the R&R during that intensity same like Bennet's case. But the unlucky part is the Staff got the wrong idea and banned Jonno instead. Further unjust when Jonno demanded for a public apology and was disregarded. Thus that is how it all came about.

But ever since, things are starting to rest but if every another day one is going to create a thread or bring this up; when is it going to end?
I've always advised the best solution and I guess it's in every forum's guide whereby when trolls or so called flame baiter are around, it's best to ignore and do not reply. Since we have the options of clicking the report button; click when deem necessary.

If you guys wants solution, I would say let the mod here to be someone without any affiliation towards any certain club so no one can blame these mods to be biased.

b00n
post Mar 25 2008, 11:43 PM

delusional
Group Icon
VIP
9,137 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Wouldn't be around much, pls PM other mods.
QUOTE(munky @ Mar 25 2008, 11:37 PM)
not at all. I still believe u can say whatever u want in ur thread, but when it comes to neutral thread, u simply dont flame, or if u r offended by someone's post/flamebait, u either ignore/report it. But somehow there are ppl who fuel the fire even more  shakehead.gif
*

No, in Liverpool thread we always advise the juniors to be sensible in their post too........because we always advised on not to do upon others what you do not expect to be do unto you.
But sometimes in the heat of the moment, situations are hard to control.

b00n
post Mar 25 2008, 11:48 PM

delusional
Group Icon
VIP
9,137 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Wouldn't be around much, pls PM other mods.
QUOTE(alien2003 @ Mar 25 2008, 11:41 PM)
Another thing is Jonno did not get any ban on account. All he got was 10% warn + disable posting for 3 days. In fact, one of the admin was then proceed to remove them. PM & ask goldfries if you all think I make this up.

I will not explain further since it will be useless if any of you insist on believing I am bias when carrying out my moderating duty.

You can always contact the staff/admin to verify/complain/etc if you think it is necessary.
*

In the heat of the moment, you never explained. Thus you can't blame ppl for suspecting you.
You should have cleared the air the first time you posted but it was until whaker posted than we knew the actual situation. But than damage had been done.

Anyway, let bygone be bygone.
b00n
post Mar 25 2008, 11:54 PM

delusional
Group Icon
VIP
9,137 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Wouldn't be around much, pls PM other mods.
QUOTE(sasuke914 @ Mar 25 2008, 11:50 PM)
On Moderator, I think thewhacker is one of the fairest moderator out there..but too bad he posted not that frequently
and on bro alien, i think he is doing great at the moment, providing informative articles to other thread not only in Man utd thread..is there any problems with that?
*

I'm not shooting at anyone. I'm saying if one can claim one moderator to be biased and all; if he got certain affiliation whereby he professed his loyalty to the club, there's bound to be claims that one is biased. It's known as conflict of interest.

So when you guys wanted solutions; isn't that the best solution?


Added on March 25, 2008, 11:56 pm
QUOTE(sasuke914 @ Mar 25 2008, 11:53 PM)
Won't it be better if moderator pm to warn 1st before issuing a warning that disable 3 days posting?
*

As explained, it was a warning. But due to mixed up; the account was disabled for posting instead by the staffs.
And one can always view the warning he got for and by whom by pointing his cursor over the warning bar.


This post has been edited by b00n: Mar 25 2008, 11:56 PM
b00n
post Mar 26 2008, 12:49 AM

delusional
Group Icon
VIP
9,137 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Wouldn't be around much, pls PM other mods.
QUOTE(sasuke914 @ Mar 26 2008, 12:34 AM)
the warning is juz like temporary ban which resulted in 3 days disable in posting..i mean literally warning should be given via pm instead of the 10% warning..
*

http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?act=faq&article=6
QUOTE
All warnings will increase the meter by 10% for each warning given but percentage do not dictate suspensions time. You may be warned several times for minor offenses before suspensions is given but receive a suspension for just making a serious offense. All warnings will expire 6 months after it was issued. Warning prunes are done automatically by a script which runs on the first day of each month only. As such, if your warning was due to end on the 3rd of February for example, it will only be removed on the 1st of March. As of 21st March 2006, all warn prunes will reduce your meter by 10%, but the logs will remain.


b00n
post Mar 26 2008, 12:54 AM

delusional
Group Icon
VIP
9,137 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Wouldn't be around much, pls PM other mods.
QUOTE(J-Piggy @ Mar 26 2008, 12:34 AM)
Even though it is LYN forum , the thread itself belongs to the clubs.As for those kiddo who posted "glory glory Man Utd" at least should get punishment, right?Deleting posts is not going to help much...The warning which disable the posting option should be given. nod.gif
*

There's nothing wrong with someone posting that in another thread other than United thread. In a matured action, either one reports that particular post with the reason "childish statement" or just shrug it off and ignore. I chose the latter. But what i see most of the time is ppl getting into arguments with those ppl fully aware of their purposes on taunting rival clubs.

b00n
post Mar 26 2008, 12:55 AM

delusional
Group Icon
VIP
9,137 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Wouldn't be around much, pls PM other mods.
QUOTE(J-Piggy @ Mar 26 2008, 12:51 AM)
It solely depends on how severe your offends are.If teruk then of course more than 3 days la..
*

Yes, as I was explaining to sasuke914 that it was meant to be a warning like explained by whaker and alien. However, there's mixed up and staffs awarded a suspension of posting instead.

b00n
post Mar 26 2008, 12:59 AM

delusional
Group Icon
VIP
9,137 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Wouldn't be around much, pls PM other mods.
Anyway, off to sleep.
Keep up constructive criticism instead of sole banter. i.e. heed aboogee's advise.

Cheers and good night!


Added on March 26, 2008, 1:02 am
QUOTE(J-Piggy @ Mar 26 2008, 12:58 AM)
Personally, I din see anything wrong if someone happen to be doing the former action.
For example:

Miss A and Miss B are rivals. Miss A step over Miss B's lawn and insult how terrible Miss B's lawn are..how disrespectful those comments are...

Hence it is understandable how ppl gets into arguments instead of ignore them.
*

Yes, but since it's in my house; I can choose either to ask him to leave or call the police. I.e. the latter would be the "report" button. Or I could chose to ignore and let him speak to himself while I continue household chores.

What I'm saying is it all depends on how one looks at it. Personally if no one bothers him, he's as good as jerking himself with either his right or left or even both hand. i.e. amusing himself or shall I say bore himself to death.

This post has been edited by b00n: Mar 26 2008, 01:04 AM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0212sec    0.91    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 01:38 PM