QUOTE(maxpudding @ Sep 13 2025, 09:36 AM)
ROFLMAO far from it
You just showed to us that “prof” used chatgpt to convey his thoughts la. Which is even more pathetic 😂
Btw matrix also have two years programme

So let’s discuss abit before I go for my morning swim. He is oversimplifying the numbers. Sure, 90% quota for matrix is there. And yet data show that STPM enrollment to IPTA is higher. In 2024 it’s 56% compared to 32% from matrix pathway. Out of those 56%, bumi is still the majority anyways.
Say if we abolish matrix, guess who will still dominate the number of people in STPM?
If the number of intake is majority from matrix, I also will be angry la. Meaning, I also agreed should either abolish matrix or increase the number of quota for nons to enter. Itu pun you failed to get my meaning.
Go fark yourself and next time cite your sources, so I can ridicule you and them.
Ur thinking process really got problem
U hv look the whole thing through lens of race .... Why cannot u put Malaysia and Malaysian first
Ur claim of STPM enrolment into IPTA is higher than matric
Buy hey, that is another way of hiding real truth
Come let me teach u basic math:
The IPTA enrolment success rate of a pathway need to divide by its denominator
Matric success rate is > 90%
STPM success rate is only > 70%
Let me know if u still not clear. I could enlighten u further since math is key part of my engineering background