黃煜軒STPM滿分，加課外活動9.9分，總分99.9分，進不了馬大會計系，現在給出的說法竟然是分數不夠高，滿分100分的有1127人？
如此荒唐的數據，竟然還有人會相信？翻看STPM記錄，今年拿到滿分4.0的只有1200餘人，這數字還沒算上課外活動分，在STPM要州手級別才有可能滿分，滿分的比率會有多少？
別忘了，這數字也還沒區分出文科理科生。會計是妥妥的文科項目，政府近年來不斷強調理科重要性，理科考生人數節節上升，所以文科會去申請會計系，還要是滿分的人有多少？
對的，還要加上預科班。我自己就是預科班出來的，只要熟悉預科班的都知道，在預科班裡，理科文科生的比率是8比2（今年可能更懸殊），所以預科班又有多少文科學生拿全A滿分？
是的。STPM同樣的情況也在預科班發生，雖然預科班課外活動要拿滿分相對比STPM容易，因為出發點就是州級層級，但是也並非是所有人都能拿滿分的！總是幾位精英會壟斷絕大多數的參賽機會！
為此只要思考推敲一下，就可以知道1127的數字，水分有多大。所有文科生，能拿考試滿分4.0的，再加上10分課外活動的，都不知道有沒有1127人，又怎可能這些人全部都想讀馬大會計？所有人都想當會計？
思考一下，不要政府隨便跟你說大便是香的，你就像條狗一樣馬上撲過去，把路邊的大便給吃掉。用自己的腦袋想一想，別要他人空口說白話就相信！
直接拿出詳細數據來，種族和入學積分詳細列出，才能服眾。6月以來全升數據揭露華裔進入國立大學熱門科系人數大幅度減少，教育部說數據錯誤，已經三個月過去，為何還拿不出正確數據？
如此明顯的掩蓋行為，若你還看不出有貓膩，有刻意隱瞞，不過是空口說白話來胡扯，想要讓事件不了了之，那請去測一測智商，相信應當連80的基本水平線都沒有達到！
最後，還有一些洗地人亂扯說黃煜軒沒拿數學等等更是可笑，如果這是原因，如此簡單直接，馬大校長不會直接說，還要扯到他排1129名？馬大校長都沒說的問題，這些鍵盤俠就可以判斷是這原因讓他進不了？
更別提若說他成績不夠好，少拿了關鍵數學科目所以不符合資格啦，那為何還offer他Direct Intake，只要多給學費就可以入讀？這是明擺著資格不重要，有錢就沒問題嗎？就這樣還看不出問題？
要給錢的Direct Intake，明顯壓迫了政府有津貼的UPU入讀空間。讓符合資格者必須耗費巨款入讀，而Direct Intake入讀者都是華裔，馬來同胞升學管道多根本不需要，如此明顯的差別待遇，換個說法明目張膽剝削華裔，還要逆來順受？
要護主，也用點腦啦，如果有腦的話！以前的馬華用這些忽悠來掩蓋制度性打壓的事實，如今的行動黨與之前的馬華一模一樣，就連開脫行為都如出一轍，然後有白癡現在還在罵馬華？
如果你看到此事的關鍵！大力分享，去打臉這些廢材吧

Huang Yu Xuan scored full marks in STPM, plus 9.9 points from extracurricular activities, for a total of 99.9 points, yet he still could not get into UM’s (University of Malaya’s) accounting program. The explanation given now is that his score wasn’t high enough. Supposedly, there are 1,127 students with a perfect score of 100?
How can anyone believe such an absurd figure? Looking at STPM records, this year only just over 1,200 students achieved a perfect 4.0 CGPA. This number doesn’t even include extracurricular points. In STPM, you basically need to be of state-level caliber to score full marks. So what percentage could possibly reach full score?
And don’t forget, the figure hasn’t even been separated between arts and science students. Accounting is clearly an arts-based program. In recent years, the government has been repeatedly emphasizing the importance of science, with science stream student numbers steadily increasing. So, among arts students applying for accounting, how many could possibly be full scorers?

Right, then you add matriculation (pre-university) into the picture. I myself came from matriculation, and anyone familiar with it knows that the ratio of science to arts students there is about 8:2 (maybe even more skewed this year). So how many arts students in matriculation could realistically get straight A’s with full scores?
Yes, the same situation exists in matriculation. While it’s relatively easier to get full extracurricular marks there compared to STPM—since the starting point is at the state level—it still doesn’t mean everyone can get full marks! Usually, a small group of elites dominate most of the opportunities to represent the school or state.

So just by thinking carefully, you can tell how inflated the number “1,127” is. Are there even 1,127 arts students who scored 4.0 plus full extracurricular marks? And even if so, how could it be that all of them want to study accounting at UM? Everyone wants to be an accountant?

Think about it—don’t just believe the government when they tell you “shit smells fragrant,” and then, like a dog, you immediately rush to eat it. Use your own brain—don’t believe everything just because someone says it.

They should release the detailed data—breaking down by race and admission score—for the public to see. Since June, figures have shown that the number of Chinese students entering popular courses in public universities has dropped sharply. The Ministry of Education claimed the data was wrong, but three months have passed and they still haven’t produced the corrected numbers.
Such an obvious cover-up—if you still can’t see the trickery, the deliberate concealment, and the baseless excuses meant to let the issue quietly fade away—then maybe go test your IQ, because it probably doesn’t even reach the basic level of 80!

And finally, some “apologists” spreading nonsense that Huang Yu Xuan didn’t take Mathematics—this is laughable. If that really were the reason, so simple and straightforward, wouldn’t the UM Vice-Chancellor just say so directly, instead of talking about him being ranked 1129th? If the Vice-Chancellor didn’t even mention it, how do these keyboard warriors dare claim that’s the reason he wasn’t admitted?

And if they argue that his grades weren’t good enough, that he missed the key subject Mathematics and therefore wasn’t qualified—then why was he still offered Direct Intake, where he could enter as long as he paid higher fees? That clearly shows qualifications don’t matter, only money. And you still can’t see the problem?

Direct Intake, which requires payment, clearly squeezes out subsidized UPU admission slots. This forces qualified students to spend huge amounts just to enroll. Meanwhile, Direct Intake students are mostly Chinese, while Malays don’t even need this channel since they already have plenty of admission pathways. This is blatant differential treatment—put plainly, an open exploitation of Chinese students. And we’re expected to accept it quietly?

If you want to defend the system, at least use your brain—if you have one! In the past, MCA used such excuses to cover up systemic oppression. Today, DAP is exactly the same as MCA back then, even their excuses are identical. Yet some idiots still bash MCA now?