QUOTE(!@#$%^ @ Jan 28 2024, 02:42 PM)
it brings a lot of question.
u spend more, so u have less disposable income, and therefore eligible for subsidy? as compared to another who saves more and less expenditure, and therefore not eligible for subsidy?
u spend more, so u have less disposable income, and therefore eligible for subsidy? as compared to another who saves more and less expenditure, and therefore not eligible for subsidy?
QUOTE(MUM @ Jan 28 2024, 03:10 PM)
In thus youtube video, DR WEE had tell of with examples about "disposable income" issue if PADU is basing on it.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&...MWd91XPDaq8Ib4s
Finally white hair dog got some use. LOL. Yes, he is right. Again, back to lack of transparency and lack of information from Menteri Ekonomi. What is definition of disposable income? https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&...MWd91XPDaq8Ib4s
Last last white hair dog say use back T20/M40/B40 + lokaliti. Actually this is correct. Easy, no BS. Definition already very clear. What needed to be amend is the level of T20. Right now, it doesn't take much to be a T20, which is a joke. All the T20/M40/M40 needs to have their income level increased and adjustment for locality.
This Ekonomi Minister is wasting time and resources trying to reinvent the wheel.
PS: Funny thing about politikus...all very intelligent when not in Gov or Minister. Once in gov and Minister, become dumb and dumberer.
This post has been edited by CommodoreAmiga: Jan 28 2024, 03:37 PM
Jan 28 2024, 03:28 PM

Quote
0.0443sec
0.53
6 queries
GZIP Disabled