QUOTE(takbodoh722 @ Feb 26 2023, 08:31 AM)
Indon procurement is also substantial. Everyone is arming in case a fight breaks out.
That's why ASEAN mechanism needs to be enhanced. The weapons should be pointed outside of ASEAN not at each other. More joint exercises helps.
A joint ASEAN blueprint on managing big powers in the region would also help.
Not so on Indo.
They have a unique (to put it mildly) system of letting the whole world know their intents or perhaps interest.
The follow-up is left wanting due to conflicting plans, insufficient funds, infighting amongst govt branches, etc.
The last time I brought this up, some folks find it a little hard to believe - many of Indos cited procurement are dead in the water - need resuscitation or in trouble. I'll name some - Arrowhead, F15ID, fixes for Korean submarine, fixes for PT PAL unstable ships (design issues), the Korean stealth fighter, etc.
Many of these programs will fade into nothing. Occasionally, you will hear some news about them on the latter being ongoing but never finished.
The heart of collective SEA defence to me is FPDA - linked as it is to mutual defence treaties or arrangements to greater powers tying them to SEA defence e.g. Anzac treaty with the US or Sg's Strategic Cooperation Agreement with the US.
Build upon that. Forget about pre biases as the old guard is almost gone. It is a new world.
This post has been edited by Mai189: Feb 26 2023, 12:15 PM