its just the benchmark la, doesnt mean the real performance. if we all using same standard version, then can compare lo.

haha....mine get something like yours if not mistaken, tonight install and run it. tonight post screenshot

Newer version is more accurate? Not sure,but don't know why the benchmark is a bit lower than the old versions.I try mine before with 229FSB 1:1 ratio was getting about 4.8k+ in the memory bandwidth only.I was also shocked to see that.Really can't believe.

Is a good idea too.Then we can see nad compare them side by side.

yea......calling all 478 users post memory bandwidth with latest sisoft sandra screenshot.

hi kabuki..mind to share ur 3dmark 03 score using the galaxy 7300gt

I think he should be getting around 9k+ to 10k with his card.

Raymond is right again. downclocked 7300GT now running at 9.6k+-. hehee......

What a waaste running at downclock speed.No ohm la....LAst time what was the problem caused you to run at downclock? If running at the exact clock can be 10k+ already.

Lol.. 7300GT wo! "ohmm" card for AGP series lo.. 10k score very good liao. My 9800PRO clock to 9800XT speed only mange to get 8k++ le..

By then, 6800XT and 7300GT.. Which is better? In term of performance.. Not benchmark score.. Plan to get a backup back thou.. New set only RM230 at my place.. Galaxy brand.

who dont wish to get higher speed and better performance? mine having problem at stock speed. haiz......

it hang my pc like the vram speed is too high. so end up i downclock it in order to get it stable.

rma-ed and it seems the same. suspect that its not compatible with my mobo i guess. so just use as it is lo.

can get 10k with current oc speed and stock 7300GT speed. able to set the screenshot. tonight's homework, get sandra and 3dmark03 screenshot.

Wow, seems like everyone is heating up benchmarking.

For the SuperPi, last time i try to clock it 3.38GHz then only can reach a mere 39.95sec.
Maybe need higher clocks to achieve better time.


Attached thumbnail(s)

i have the same stepping as yours, too bad mine cant make it well with 1:1. 39s is really sweet already.

Haha, well my current ram doesnt allow me to have a good combination of speed and timing. Previous ram can go all the way up 260Mhz easily, but this Team Xtreme abit weird.

what ram are you using last time?? Team Xtreme is not bad already la. but a pc4800 only manage to get 260?? i think can go more than that. just my 2 cents

From what i can see seems like those TCCD RAM are not able to perform at full potential in P4 platform.What a waste man.

Last time i use Patriot with IC7-MAX3.

Well that time i dont see the need to push higher clocks as im not so free to test the system stability since it consume times. Juz play play with it, as long the system didnt restart itself then is a good sign.

Haha.. 39s for PI 1M really sweet. Mine still need to takes 40s eh..

This just shows how a midrange card can trash a highend card two generations back. My 9700 PRO scores a little lower than fylon's.

Today I just got three 40MM fans running at 10,000 RPM from dj.eRicZzz. Two of them will be used as RAM fans, where as the single fan will be used on my NB. The noise is just really loud, but not till it's unbearable. Tonight I'm lapping the NB heatsink, and doing the necessary work, let's just see if this works for 250 FSB

hi kabuki..what version of forceware are u using rite now...i get around 9400 with stock speed..but i can't even OC my card a bit or it'll start to crash

p4 3.2Ghz is it the highest?

If im not minstake, S478 the highest speed is 3.4Ghz. But it rare to find.