QUOTE(solarmystic @ Jul 4 2023, 05:10 AM)
Not that surprising when you remember that the 3700X cost around 1.3K when launched back in 2019 and the 9900K was a RM 2K++ CPU when it launched in 2018.
AMD didn't beat Intel in gaming until Zen 3 5000 series.
Zen 1 & 2 was a poor gaming CPU because the nature of MCX and process node limitations then, each CCX was 4 cores so that CPU itself was really 4+4 cores and that lead to high latencies in games that uses more than 4 cores as the CCX need to 'talk' with each other over a physically separated bus. The higher IPC of Zen could not overcome the longer signal time when CCX crosstalks.
For Zen 3, the node improvements meant they could cram up to 8 cores into 1 CCX and while Zen 3 physically is still the same MCX, it is actually operating as 8+8 cores and for games the 6-8 cores count are ideal. By only prioritising one CCX for games, it now operates like a monolithic CPU similar to Intel's, and coupled with Zen's superior IPC & power efficiency, this is why games took a huge leap with Zen 3. This is also why X3D is stacked onto only one CCX, games simply don't need more than 8 cores at least for now.
One thing that such comparos forget to mention is that platforms built with Zen2 could still be upgraded to Zen 3 (and technically is still alive with the latest CPU launched this week), those who were on 9900K had no upgrade path.