QUOTE(ycs @ Jan 27 2024, 10:22 AM)
any truth to this?
.
Yes this is true, and it is widely known in the industry.
The thing is, the Participating Funds are broken into 2 - Estate and Asset Share.
Asset Share = share of ownership by Par policyholders.
Estate = "unknown" money floating around in the Par Fund for which the beneficial owners cannot be traced back.
Where the whistleblower is wrong is that, the Estate funds do not actually impact the current Par policyholders. They were not shortchanged. For current Par policyholders, their benefits/returns etc come from the Asset Share portion of the Par fund, where everything is accounted for fairly and in accordance with the 90:10 rule.
Over the years, Great Eastern may have had an estate that had ballooned up. You cannot distribute it to current Par policyholders because it's going to be unfair gain for the policyholders. Maybe this is an agreement they reached with the government to trim down the Estate, for which they have zero ownership over.
TLDR: Although there is some political element here, it cannot be denied that Great Eastern, Government of Malaysia, and B40 rakyat all mutually benefitted at the expense of "unknown" money that has been floating around for decades.
Link to policy document:
https://www.bnm.gov.my/documents/20124/9481...mt-July2023.pdf
This post has been edited by contestchris: Jan 27 2024, 10:41 AM