For starters the Bible tells us that Jesus created this world. He is the creator not a created being. Only God can create.

John 1:1–4, "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made. In Him was life, and the life was the light of men."

Genesis 1:1, “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.”

Colossians 1:16, “For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him.”

Jesus defines Himself as eternal. “I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty” (Revelation 1:8).

He is, and has, eternal life (1 John 5:11, 12, 20).

He is all-powerful (Revelation 1:8).

The Father even calls Jesus God. “But to the Son He says: “Your throne, O God, is forever and ever; A scepter of righteousness is the scepter of Your kingdom.” (Hebrews 1:8). 

Jesus is able to forgive sin (Luke 5:20-21); The Bible says only God can forgive sin (Isaiah 43:25).

Jesus accepted worship that according to the Ten Commandments is reserved only for the Almighty (Matthew 14:33). “And as they went to tell His disciples, behold, Jesus met them, saying, “Rejoice!” So they came and held Him by the feet and worshiped Him.” (Matthew 28:9). Upon seeing the risen Savior, the converted skeptic, Thomas, confessed, “My Lord and my God!” (John 20:26–29).

Even the angels worship Jesus. “But when He again brings the firstborn into the world, He says: “Let all the angels of God worship Him.” (Hebrews 1:6).

The Scriptures also teach that only God knows the thoughts of a man’s heart (1 Kings 8:39). Yet Jesus consistently knew what people were thinking, “for he knew what was in man” (John 2:25). “Nathanael said to Him, ‘How do You know me?’ Jesus answered and said to him, ‘Before Philip called you, when you were under the fig tree, I saw you’” (John 1:48).

Through the Spirit, Jesus is omnipresent. “Lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age” (Matthew 28:20). “For I am with you, and no one will attack you to hurt you; for I have many people in this city” (Acts 18:10).

He has power to give life, and even resurrected Himself. “No one takes it from Me, but I lay it down of Myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again.” (John 10:18).

“I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live” (John 11:25).

Therefore, by considering the primary definitions of God, and seeing that Jesus fits every one of those definitions, obviously, Jesus must be eternal God.

Those verses you posted above show Jesus glorifying the Father. The Father, Son and Holy Spirit are God according to the Bible.

They have equal power and glory. But among the three of the Godhead it appears that the Father is recognized as the ultimate authority.

“And you are Christ’s, and Christ is God’s” (1 Corinthians 3:23). “But I want you to know that the head of every man is Christ, the head of woman is man, and the head of Christ is God” (1 Corinthians 11:3).

The Son constantly receives His glory, power, throne, and prerogatives as Judge from the Father (John 3:35; John 5:22).

Indeed, it was God the Father that “gave” the Son. In fact, while it might not be wrong, we are never told to pray to Jesus or the Spirit - but instead to the Father in the name of the Son.

Yet just because the Father seems to have supreme authority, it does not in any way diminish from the divinity of Jesus and the Spirit.

Also when Jesus was on earth He was human and had to completely rely on the Father for everything.

God the Father calling Jesus His Son, does not mean He is not God as scripture proves.

We are quite familiar with the type of questions moslems use to critique Christianity.

This is one of them.

How can a God die?

Well to answer you, Jesus is not only God but also fully Man. Why Man? To represent the world.

and why is that?

For Saving Man kind. That is why He is called a Saviour.

And did Jesus remain dead?

Answer is No. He was resurrected as evidence that his sacrifice on the cross has fully met all the demands of a Righteous and Just God who we called Father God who is in Heaven.

How is all these possible?

As I've said before only God can exhibit the imposible....all this is rather impossible if Jesus is just Man.

That you have to cautious not to mis-represent the Christian view.

There is a need to understand and research on the essential and economical Trinity, though, this is more of a "cream" understanding of the text.

The Biblical text is clear.

On the one hand, the Father did not die on the cross but the Son did.

But due to coinherence and co-existing and co-working of the Trinity in each of the manifested hypostasis, we can say that God also died on the cross (Acts 20:28 - due to Christ's humanity).

Yet, we cannot say the Father died but only the Son.
That is the simplest that I can say.

.
About the same God the Son dying on earth and the same God the Father eternally living and ruling in heaven, let me give an analogy about a Muslim man in Malaysia.

Let's say, from a few years ago, he was in Malaysia and daily video-calling his Muslim male friend in Indian Kashmir, eg teaching and sending money to his Kashmiri friend, ie digitally and not physically.
....... Suddenly, the Indian government permanently bans all telecommunications in Indian Kashmir, fully lockdowns Kashmir and the Kashmiri can no longer see his Malaysian friend digitally via video-calls or contact him, even until the day the Kashmiri later dies in Kashmir. To the Kashmiri in Kashmir, his Malaysian friend has disappeared or no longer exist or has practically died, digitally. But in reality and physically, his Malaysian friend is still alive living in Malaysia.

In my analogy, Indian Kashmir is like the Malaysian Muslim man was Christ on earth who died digitally in Kashmir(= on earth), ie no more video-calling to show his existence there; and Malaysia is like he is the Father in heaven and still alive physically.
.

  I felt this analogy is quite deficient. Ever heard of Docetism? One of the heresy?

One of the earliest Christian sectarian doctrines, affirming that Christ did not have a real or natural body during his life on earth but only an apparent or phantom one.

This is hard because there is no known analogy that can describe this. We just have to clear of the nuances and subteties as presented in the Scripture and those before us.

Firstly, we have to clear what is coinherence. Coinherence refers to the mutual indwelling of the three of the Divine Trinity. In the Gospel of John the Lord repeatedly told His disciples that He was in the Father and the Father was in Him (John 10:38; 14:10, 20; 17:21, 23). The coinhering oneness of the Divine Trinity is fundamental to understanding how the Father, the Son, and the Spirit can be one God. The coinherence of the Divine Trinity is beyond illustration, as it has no example in the physical universe. Even more, it is beyond the ability of man-made systems of logic to explain. It is the greatest mystery concerning the Triune God and shatters all attempts to neatly explain the Trinity.

This is one of the "architecture" of the Triune God.

The coinherence of the three of the Divine Trinity is eternal and immutable. It did not cease when the Son of God became a man through incarnation, nor was it limited to the brief time when the Son lived on earth in His humanity. The Bible tells us that all the fullness of the Godhead dwells in Him bodily (Col.
2:9) and that He was God manifested in the flesh (1 Tim. 3:16) and was God with us (Matt. 1:23). It does not say that the fullness of one-third of the Godhead dwells in Him bodily, nor does it say that one-third of God was manifested in the flesh or that He was one-third of God with us.

What does this mean is:

This oneness of essence explains the fact that, while Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, as respects their personality, are distinct subsistences, there is an intercommunion of persons and an immanence of one divine person in another which permits the peculiar work of one to be ascribed …to either of
the other, and the manifestation of one to be recognized in the manifestation of the other. I think this quote is from Strong.

The persons of the Holy Trinity are not separable individuals. Each involves the others; the coming of each is the coming of the others. So, the coming of the Spirit must have involved the coming of the Son.

1) We must be careful to avoid understanding that the Father (or the Spirit) was the subject of the suffering in the death of Christ,

2) but we must be equally careful to avoid understanding that the Son was separate from the Father and the Spirit in the crucifixion.

What we must maintain is that in the visible death of Christ the three of the Trinity operated so as to make manifest the distinct activity of the Son on the cross. It was indeed the Son whom we should identify as the subject of the death of the God-man (even though we confess  that God Himself does not die!),  but we must hold at the same time the realization that the Father and the Spirit were also in operation and that the operation of the three made the distinct action of the Son possible.

Thomas F. Torrance, an esteemed Scottish reformed theologian, also said the same things to the involvement of the entire Triune God in the work of redemption:
This is why Paul can say: Keep watch over yourselves and all the flock of which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers. Be shepherds of the church of God,[a] which he bought with his own blood (Acts 20:28)