Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

7 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Flying V with these specs?, Help me find a V guitar.

views
     
RustReaver4D1
post Jul 2 2007, 10:51 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,100 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(fatboythin @ Jun 28 2007, 11:51 PM)
Darn, hoped the RR3 would have at least good fret access. Is there a big difference between a bolt-on and a set-in? The Razorback Vs have set-in necks.
*
The upper fret access on the RR3 is nothing compared to the Ibanez RG /w the AANJ, but access up to 20th fret isn't a problem.

Not many songs require you to shred your @ss off in the 20 to 22nd fret area anyway... unless you're into some really seriously psycho-shred stuff with sweep arps that start like on the 22nd fret low E... but if you're into that kind of stuff, you'll probably have the skill to compensate for the fret access anyway. tongue.gif
soulfly
post Jul 2 2007, 01:08 PM

revving towards 10,000 rpm
Group Icon
VIP
15,904 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Miri



can't go wrong with Jackson King V tongue.gif
Everdying
post Jul 2 2007, 03:15 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

RustReaver4D1
post Jul 2 2007, 04:07 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,100 posts

Joined: Jan 2007



Everdying
post Jul 2 2007, 04:18 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(RustReaver4D1 @ Jul 2 2007, 04:07 PM)
The first is playable, the second is not.  tongue.gif
*
thats cos you've never tried a SG with 60s neck.
not playable? better than pencil thin necks tongue.gif


TSfatboythin
post Jul 2 2007, 04:21 PM

LYN Insomniac
*****
Senior Member
816 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Damansara, KL


Haha, the 60s necks are ok, but i really hate those baseball bat 50s necks...

LTD MH-400? How much is that going for at GC? Knowing them, surely its gonna be like twice the price it should be.. sad.gif
Everdying
post Jul 2 2007, 04:24 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
thats why i dont own any current SG standards, i got 3 SGs with 60s necks plus my '74 standard whos neck is damn thick but has narrower fretboard so its real comfortable.
plus the necks on current SG standards are somehow bigger than my LP standard w/ 50s neck.

TSfatboythin
post Jul 2 2007, 05:01 PM

LYN Insomniac
*****
Senior Member
816 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Damansara, KL


Damn us Asians and our small hands...
Lol..
SweetTooth
post Jul 2 2007, 08:12 PM

 
*******
Senior Member
2,650 posts

Joined: May 2005


QUOTE(fatboythin @ Jul 2 2007, 04:21 PM)
Haha, the 60s necks are ok, but i really hate those baseball bat 50s necks...

LTD MH-400? How much is that going for at GC? Knowing them, surely its gonna be like twice the price it should be.. sad.gif
*
well my friend bought a MH250 for RM2.8k so......
i'm guessing RM3.6k or >4k
TSfatboythin
post Jul 2 2007, 08:22 PM

LYN Insomniac
*****
Senior Member
816 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Damansara, KL


I just knew that was coming. WAY overpriced, haih. Guess i'll just have to make do with something else.

Any other recommendations? Doesn't have to be a V anymore. Just a good metal guitar with 24 frets and a neck thru. Max budget RM2.5k. Thanks again.
Everdying
post Jul 2 2007, 10:40 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(fatboythin @ Jul 2 2007, 08:22 PM)
I just knew that was coming. WAY overpriced, haih. Guess i'll just have to make do with something else.

Any other recommendations? Doesn't have to be a V anymore. Just a good metal guitar with 24 frets and a neck thru. Max budget RM2.5k. Thanks again.
*
i know one good one.
a kramer baretta that woh fatt is selling.
they got one red and one blue.

http://www.musicyo.com/news/baretta_rev.asp
http://www.musicyo.com/news/gitrrvw9_01.jpg

its a beautiful guitar, IIRC RM2200 before discount.
winkybear
post Jul 2 2007, 11:11 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
489 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


Hmm that kramer looks nice. Like their headstocks.
SweetTooth
post Jul 2 2007, 11:30 PM

 
*******
Senior Member
2,650 posts

Joined: May 2005


that guitar looks good, with the nice headstock similar to jackson's.

kramer reminds me of seinfeld =s
TSfatboythin
post Jul 3 2007, 12:00 AM

LYN Insomniac
*****
Senior Member
816 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Damansara, KL


Wow, that Kramer is too good of a deal to be true. Haha, i think i'll go to Woh Fatt and check it out. Thanks for the suggestion Everdying.

Any other suggestions? Something rad looking?? Haha.
sean392
post Jul 3 2007, 12:09 AM

Hirano Aya-Tard
*******
Senior Member
6,339 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



y is it that so few alder bodied double cuts / superstrats have archtops
zzzzzzzzz
so freaking hard to find =(
Everdying
post Jul 3 2007, 03:46 AM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
hmm, now that i recall.
the kramer at woh fatt is a fixed bridge version, tuneomatic bridge with string thru body, and the 2 humbuckers both have coil splits.
RustReaver4D1
post Jul 3 2007, 11:25 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,100 posts

Joined: Jan 2007



TSfatboythin
post Jul 3 2007, 12:12 PM

LYN Insomniac
*****
Senior Member
816 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Damansara, KL


My RG370DX is fine man, but i think i'll use it mostly for shred. Doesn't really have a good bottom tone, sounds very nasal. Doesn't suit chugging heavy metal TBH. And yea, the trem is a serious pain in the @$$.

But any pickups you recommend that would make it more suitable for heavy metal man? If it sounds good, then i won't buy another axe i guess.


RustReaver4D1
post Jul 3 2007, 12:27 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,100 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(fatboythin @ Jul 3 2007, 12:12 PM)
My RG370DX is fine man, but i think i'll use it mostly for shred. Doesn't really have a good bottom tone, sounds very nasal. Doesn't suit chugging heavy metal TBH. And yea, the trem is a serious pain in the @$$.

But any pickups you recommend that would make it more suitable for heavy metal man? If it sounds good, then i won't buy another axe i guess.
*
Ok, first off... I admit I'm an EMG ho' so what I'm gonna say is probably biased like hell.

EMG81 in bridge, EMG85 in neck... the standard EMG metal config... hehe...

The 81 is good for rhythm, but a bit tricky for fast leads coz the output is so high. The 85 on the other hand is d@mn nice for leads, very smooth and clear...

The thing about the 81/85, if I'm not mistaken, is that they are actually low output passive pups that get boosted significantly by the internal pre-amp... so even though you can get very very high gain sounds, it's a very very quiet pup when you don't play.

And for chugging heavy metal, you can probably use an EQ to boost the bottom end... the EMGs themselves have very flat EQ, so they respond very well to tweaks...

Or you can probably just work on heavy picking hand technique... wink.gif
TSfatboythin
post Jul 3 2007, 12:33 PM

LYN Insomniac
*****
Senior Member
816 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Damansara, KL


Haha, i tought about the 81/85 combo, but most people say that EMGs sound too trebly in basswood and alder, something like Slayer's tone. Don't really like that.

Is this true or just some dumb myth?

7 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0228sec    0.79    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 03:52 PM