QUOTE(tien171 @ Nov 20 2018, 11:32 AM)
i get your point .
I was talking only about the running operations cost per year moving forward..
fiber lines to home are practically fault free .
while copper lines the fault rate is about 10x more . more complaints means more headcount/resources need to maintain the service level.
this fault rate will increase as the copper line ages . directly equating increase operations cost yearly.
cost of copper wires are more expensive the fiber .
copper wires get stolen frequently .
looking at these factors i really cannot see how TM can reduce cost for the streamyx package.
I get your point too. We are aware of the cost involved in the copper infra. I think about 5-10 years ago, they did replace copper lines in some areas, not sure if it was done in most area though. There is also the fact that over the past 10 years or so, many have moved to Unifi where possible. These were users from copper lines before. Cost for maintaining those should have reduced over the years as well.
If referring to the last mile copper lines, apart from theft, there is not much difference with fibre as they are using the same poles. If a pole falls, copper and fibre are affected. If a tree falls across the lines, both are afected. If referring to the trunk lines, I am not sure if its still mainly copper or its already more fibre underground. This is probably an over-simplification , but just to make the point.
When it comes to speeds, from a long time ago, most ports were already capable of higher speeds than subscribed. You could be a 1M user but your port was already capable of 4M as example. In such cases, a speed boost was just changing of settings on the backend, not even having to replace physical ports or copper lines etc. And an increase of speed does not really increase infra cost in such cases. Only issue would be bandwidth. Which it appears they have plenty of, as they are the ones who volunteered 10X upgrades for Unifi users. Surely they must have international bandwidth capacity to cater for such?
But they would not give higher speeds to Streamyx, except now they are supposed to double the speed. Why can they do it now? Has costs suddenly decreased? Why could they not have gradually increased speeds over the past years?
Then you have seen they came out with RM88 / 89 for 4M / 8M packages not too long ago. But its only for new users. How is that lower price possible if costs are still so high to maintain copper infra? And those prices are way below the normal RM140 / 160.
I understand it is not as simple as we may think it is to do something like this. My point is that it appears that they did not bother to even if they could have. Until they are being "forced" to do so. This does not mean you have the user's best interest in mind as always claimed in press statements. I guess they have to answer to their stake-holders as well.
Everyone has differing views on this sort of thing. That is ok. Eventually its up to TM what they actually do.