QUOTE(benblitz @ Jun 17 2019, 06:37 PM)
Can anyone comment between the two models?
Budget can burst slightly to 4K but as always if can get lower peice the better. Just went to desa home theatre and quoted this price:
Samsung 55NU8000 3,699
LG 55UK7500PTA 2,899
Could not find much information on the LG model but the brightness is quite good. I am fairly new to this HDR scene, but I have been calibrating my display with an i1Pro before so I can somewhat eyeball color accuracy to target 6500K.
Alas, my knowledge on HDR, local dimming etc. is close to zero, need you guys opinion and justification between the two. I have seen @Convael comments is really well informative hopefully can get some insight from you.
Essentially my viewing distance is within 2 to 3 metres, source material is a PS4 Pro and 4K netflix. Does 55" suffice or would need 65"?
Edit: Some background, i am currently using Sony WE75 49" 1080p HDR10 display. It is one of the model that was launched together initially with PS4 Pro. But i do not have any information on this TV model and I no longer have my colorimeter to do measurement. But I doubt that this model is a True HDR10 and I suspect that it may be a Fake HDR without any sort of local dimming whatsoever. If anyone do have any information on this model is welcomed to pitch in. Because as of now though my TV is displaying "HDR" contents, I dont think it produces enough brightness to properly do HDR content justice. Hence would be good if my next TV can at least serve some justice to HDR content with a good price.
The NU8000 is a lot more consistently brighter than UK7500 .Budget can burst slightly to 4K but as always if can get lower peice the better. Just went to desa home theatre and quoted this price:
Samsung 55NU8000 3,699
LG 55UK7500PTA 2,899
Could not find much information on the LG model but the brightness is quite good. I am fairly new to this HDR scene, but I have been calibrating my display with an i1Pro before so I can somewhat eyeball color accuracy to target 6500K.
Alas, my knowledge on HDR, local dimming etc. is close to zero, need you guys opinion and justification between the two. I have seen @Convael comments is really well informative hopefully can get some insight from you.
Essentially my viewing distance is within 2 to 3 metres, source material is a PS4 Pro and 4K netflix. Does 55" suffice or would need 65"?
Edit: Some background, i am currently using Sony WE75 49" 1080p HDR10 display. It is one of the model that was launched together initially with PS4 Pro. But i do not have any information on this TV model and I no longer have my colorimeter to do measurement. But I doubt that this model is a True HDR10 and I suspect that it may be a Fake HDR without any sort of local dimming whatsoever. If anyone do have any information on this model is welcomed to pitch in. Because as of now though my TV is displaying "HDR" contents, I dont think it produces enough brightness to properly do HDR content justice. Hence would be good if my next TV can at least serve some justice to HDR content with a good price.
UK7500 may look bright enough in the shop . But TV shops don't usually loop HDR demo because it makes TV consumes more electricity in the long run.
Download some HDR demo clip on a thumbdrive and play them on the said TV.
And unlike most things in real life , TV only shows its " true colors " when the lights are turned off . Every little flaw on the screen is made more obvious in the dark.
Which is why it is impossible to determine the Picture Quality from demo in shop which is usually bright and well lit.
The same reason why last year , during Samsung QLED 's debut event they have briefly dimmed down the lights to show off the picture quality of their high end QLED Models .
I remembered the W750X model from Sony . It was one of the very rare 1080p TV that is compatible with HDR .
Unfortunately as you described , it can't get bright enough to extend the dynamic range of the pictures since it doesn't has a Local Dimming system.
The whole purpose of getting 4k TV , is you can sit closer to the screen and not having to see all the pixelation.
Without dwelling into too much details because this topic has been widely discussed , if you are below sitting below 2.5 m , 55" will be fine . Further than 2.5m , 65" + is ideal.
Typically if the TV screen is filling up roughly ~ 40%-60% of your vision field , that should be your comfort zone.
Remember these are merely guidelines . They are more of a recommendation but not absolute rules . Feel free to make adjustment if needed .
Of course if you have a bigger TV , you also have more flexibility to adjust the distance between your seat and the screen.
Jun 18 2019, 02:49 PM

Quote
0.0279sec
0.65
6 queries
GZIP Disabled