Nope, it can't because it's of lower nm design. why? after this...

Wrong, it doesn't have anything to do with processor straps. It's because these new processors according to Intel's white papers require motherboards with PWM 11.1 compliant designs to be able to boot it. Something to do with the HALT states and bootup voltages

This post has been edited by almostthere: Jul 7 2007, 06:36 PM

O... well i thought this super overclocking mobo will no longer be the best overclocking mobo after fsb1333 processor release.... well it's my fault.... sry...

bro almostthere,after i install my proc,my bios can config one thing call "frequency unlimit",which can be set to enabled or disabled.
if i enable,i can set my multiplier to 60x!!!!!
how come like that?

Walao, multiplier can go up to 60.... that's ridiculous but wouldn't that harm the processor....

ya,i was shocked to see that.....
and on the top after i adjust to 60x multiplier,my cpu speed showing 1xxxxMHz,(10GHz),haha....if can boot then it will be world record liao

OMG....I thought it would immediately 'kill' the pros IMMEDIATELY!!

does this mean that this board can support the upcoming new processor??? the 6x50 ones?

It won't kill the processor, will just make the system unable to boot. Only high voltage apply will kill off with tremendous heat.

Hm, thanks guys. The new E6x50 ones seem to be cheaper, but if can't support then I'll have to buy the E6x00 ones then. Got confused because I saw one LYP pricelist stating the mobo is 1333Mhz FSB.

This post has been edited by kurogane: Jul 8 2007, 01:02 AM

Because it's meant for the older generation Pentium's which had very high multipliers beyond 15. In fact if you read properly the comment of it in the BIOS, it tells exactly that. It's actually meant purely for ES P4's AFAIK

if not mistaken,the option is used for Pentium EE Presler one.
now running happily with 3.0GHz,thanks for ur help bro almostthere,much appreciated...

I got my E6600 to boot at 3.6Ghz (400x9), but it crashes (BSOD) when loading Vista.
vcore: 1.43v, vNB=1.46v, vTT= 1.325v. Hmm, gotta try again.

p/s: Works fine at 3.2Ghz though (356x9)

drop the multi to an 8 and see whther it's an FSB or clockspeed problem. And 3.6Ghz would require a bit more VCore IMHO. But try revising your advanced timings if I were you

Manage to pull off a decent SuperPI. Will try more, aiming 3.5Ghz and above.

On full load, vcore is at 1.376v.

Nice one there. Really tight timing.

I also finally read that guide at The Tech Repository, printed the whole damn thing except the pictures and go to BIOS and set it one by one but still i can't set my RAM timing manually. I really have no idea what's wrong. What i don't get is i can set the timing just fine when the FSB is at default 266FSB, i haven't tried setting the timing at any other FSB except 266 and 400, at 400 i simply can't set the timing at all. Any ideas ?

Enough with that i give up with setting RAM timing, i set my DDR Configuration Mode to Mode 2, Enhanced Data Transmitting & Enhanced Addressing to Fast, DQ Calibration to 6 and somewhat managed to lower NB to 1.45 now without games crashing. VDimm now is at 2.3V and VTT at 1.425. SB remains default.

As for the RAM timing, i just set it in Windows but still can't set the damn tCL to 4. The rest i just followed the guide except All Precharge to Activate. If i set it to 3 Windows will crash straightaway.


This post has been edited by Joseph Hahn: Jul 9 2007, 04:54 AM

wah ace combat quad core can run at 3.0ghz.....nice.....can post some screen shot,

btw i have a question over here, anyone have problem with the on board sound during OC, it seems my onboard sound is giving me problem after 320mhz....eventhough it's super PI and orthos steady, the sound does not work properly. any idea how to trouble shoot on this.

Quite good and consistent with clock's scaling. Mine does 18.453s at 3.2Ghz so your's is quite expected TBH

Can't help you directly on that as I decided on day 1 to use a soundcard instead. But my guess personally is you may have to jack up your VNB a bit to see what's the prob. Seems from my observation the ICH isn't responding correctly when you scale the FSB. Remember that your MCH is located in there too and if you're running at lower multipliers, you're actually effectively running a higher divisionary NB clock speed

if you're still not sure what I'm saying, this seems a better explanation

http://www.thetechrepository.com/showpost....=33&postcount=2

This post has been edited by almostthere: Jul 9 2007, 05:03 PM

bro,let me tweak kaw kaw first then i post my screenie here....
wanna see can go beyond 4.0GHz or not,but one thing.

MY PC IS AN EGG BOILER

What to do 130W TDP summore 4*65nm = 200nm die size. All current HSF is optimised for about 130nm and below ma

egg boiler........hehe nvm lar u can always use peltier like dell 720H2C........... now they manage to get 3.6ghz on 43 cores....... i believe ur will be able too........

icic thx for the info almostthere, i'm planning to get a sound card soon too........x-fi is just too expensive and nothing in between is to my liking...... may be i do what u said and see how it goes.......