Here’s a detailed comparison of the **Michelin Primacy SUV+** and the **Continental UltraContact UC7** to help you choose the right touring/SUV tire:

---

## 🏁 Performance

### **Wet Grip & Safety**

* **Primacy SUV+** shows superior wet braking (\~43.8 m vs 45.1 m) and better aquaplaning resistance (\~78.4 km/h vs 77.7 km/h) than UC6/UC7 equivalents ([toptirereview.com][1]).
* Consistently praised for excellent wet control, making it a top choice in rainy conditions.

### **Dry Handling & Braking**

* **UltraContact UC7** edges out Primacy in dry performance, with quicker braking and sharper handling: \~37.9 m stopping vs 40.3 m, and marginally faster slalom/braking times ([toptirereview.com][2], [toptirereview.com][1]).
* Felt “very predictable and potent” during test drives ([wapcar.my][3]).

---

## 🎧 Noise & Comfort

* **UC7** is quieter and more comfort-focused, scoring better in NVH tests (\~58.3 dB vs 58.8 dB) and comfort ratings (7.2/10 vs 6.6/10) ([toptirereview.com][1]).
* User reviews echo this:

  > “my car is also using… UC6 SUV… very comfortable (ride became softer) and very quiet” ([reddit.com][4])
  > “Got myself UC7… way quieter than primacy 4” ([forum.lowyat.net][5])

---

## ⛽ Rolling Resistance & Fuel Economy

* **UC7** offers lower rolling resistance (\~7.21 N/kN vs 8.2 N/kN), which translates to better fuel efficiency ([toptirereview.com][1]).
* Primacy may have slightly higher rolling resistance but compensates with weight savings and refined compound design ([toptirereview.com][6]).

---

## 🔧 Durability & Build

* **Tread depth**: UC7 (≈7.31 mm) deeper than Primacy (≈6.82 mm), implying potentially longer wear and better aquaplaning ([toptirereview.com][6]).
* **Construction**: Primacy has dual-ply and thicker underlay—stronger build; UC7 uses single ply with slightly thinner underlay .

---

## 💰 Price & Value

* **UC7** is more budget-friendly —≈RM 580 vs RM 680 for Primacy (225/45R18) ([toptirereview.com][7]).
* In Malaysia, Primacy SUV+ and Continental UC6 SUV are comparably priced (\~6% difference) .

---

## 🗣️ Community Highlights

* UC7 praised as a comfort champion:

  > “If noise is your only priority… tyres such as UC7 … best bet.” ([reddit.com][8], [reddit.com][4])
  > “I would go with the UltraContact as its a better 'touring' tyre… the difference isn't huge.” ([reddit.com][9])
* Michelin side:

  > “Michelin is always the right answer…” ([reddit.com][10])
  > “Michelin Tires are the tire equivalent of 'Buy It For Life'… very well manufactured.” ([reddit.com][11])

---

## ⚙️ Summary Table

Feature	Michelin Primacy SUV+	Continental UltraContact UC7
------------------	-------------------------------------	------------------------------------
Wet Performance	**Excellent**, best-in-class	Very good, but slightly behind
Dry Performance	Strong performer	Slightly better dry braking/handling
Noise & Comfort	Quiet, but a touch firmer	**Quieter & smoother ride**
Rolling Resistance	Moderate	**Lower**, more fuel-efficient
Durability	Solid build, slightly shallower tread	**Deeper tread, robust build**
Price (MYR)	\~RM 680/pc	\~RM 580/pc
Ideal For	Wet safety, premium feel	All-round comfort, efficiency, value

---

## 🛞 Product Options

Here are the current popular SKUs:

### [Michelin Primacy SUV+]()

#### Premium wet‑biased SUV tyre
### [Continental UltraContact UC7]()

#### Comfort and efficiency SUV tyre
**[Michelin Primacy SUV+]()**: Renowned for wet grip, low noise, and strong build quality—premium option.

**[Continental UltraContact UC7]()**: Excellent on comfort, dry braking, and fuel economy—great value.

---

## ✅ Which Should You Pick?

* **Choose *Primacy SUV+*** if you prioritize **best-in-class wet performance**, robust construction, and are willing to pay a bit more.
* **Choose *UltraContact UC7*** if you want **quiet, efficient, comfortable driving** at a lower price—with still very strong overall capability.

---

Let me know your typical driving conditions (city vs highway, wet/dry climates, load), and I can help fine-tune the recommendation!

[1]: https://toptirereview.com/michelin-primacy-...rce=chatgpt.com "SUV show down ! Michelin Primacy SUV vs Continental UC6 SUV - Top Tire Review"
[2]: https://toptirereview.com/2023-top-tire-rev...rce=chatgpt.com "2023 Top Tire Review APAC Touring Tire Test - Top Tire Review"
[3]: https://www.wapcar.my/news/57735review-cont...rce=chatgpt.com "Review: Continental UltraContact UC7 - The comfort touring tyre with a performance edge | WapCar"
[4]: https://www.reddit.com/r/kereta/comments/1e...rce=chatgpt.com "Advice on new tyres..."
[5]: https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/5420880/%2B0...rce=chatgpt.com "Conti UltraContact UC7 vs Michelin Primacy 4 ST"
[6]: https://toptirereview.com/tire-cross-sectio...rce=chatgpt.com "Tire Cross Section Analysis : Michelin Primacy 4 ST vs Continental UltraContact 7 - Top Tire Review"
[7]: https://toptirereview.com/continental-ultra...rce=chatgpt.com "Continental UltraContact UC7 vs Michelin Primacy 4 ST - Top Tire Review"
[8]: https://www.reddit.com/r/kereta/comments/1f...rce=chatgpt.com "Car tyres for wet roads"
[9]: https://www.reddit.com/r/TyreReviews/commen...rce=chatgpt.com "I can't decide"
[10]: https://www.reddit.com/r/CarsAustralia/comm...rce=chatgpt.com "Quiet tyres"
[11]: https://www.reddit.com/r/tires/comments/1ap...rce=chatgpt.com "Are the Michelin Tires really all that good or just overrated?"
Fresh from chatgpt.

first of all, I had a worse experience with wet traction and wet handling for Continental UC6. And our WhatsApp group for the car, which unfortunately comes with UC6 as stock tyres, all complaining about the same issue with wet traction on this particular model, which is worse than any unknown brand's tyres or model for wet traction. For dry, it is ok and kinda quiet vs rival. Many I known are just letting go of this junk model at tyre shop and jump to Michelin, be it Primacy or PS4 SUV, both are praised by many owners for wet traction drive. Others with budget reason choose Toyo CR1 SUV, and surprisingly, it is much better than UC6, again at wet handling control. Not sure why they just not strong on this.

The website or Youtube shared, of course, must show Continental win big, after all the Dr Edwin is currently working with the Continental Tyres company. Its not really a neutral party who testing for the tyres test, hence if I can put inflated tyre pressure to rival model, my tyre will win for any categories listed. This I am assuming, since it is not handled by a neutral party or company for the test.

So for me and few buddies who had bad experience with this brand will either jump to reputable model from Michelin or skip any tyres from Continental. Hence I am not opting for UC7 or MC7 in the future. From my reading on FB, those who really test the MC7 on hoping it will good as Michelin PS series, they are all said it is not, especially on wet heavy rain situation. Only Cost factor they won against Michelin

Saw gen 2 CRVs going at below rm10k ... any advise.. always wanted one when i was younger... spare parts selling like gold? easy to get? Looking at one now but scare to take on one
takut become tersadai at my weekend home in JB...

for RS user, do u notice any significant different between using 0W20 and 5W30 engine oil?

Here’s a detailed comparison of the **Michelin Primacy SUV+** and the **Continental UltraContact UC7** to help you choose the right touring/SUV tire:

---

## 🏁 Performance

### **Wet Grip & Safety**

* **Primacy SUV+** shows superior wet braking (\~43.8 m vs 45.1 m) and better aquaplaning resistance (\~78.4 km/h vs 77.7 km/h) than UC6/UC7 equivalents ([toptirereview.com][1]).
* Consistently praised for excellent wet control, making it a top choice in rainy conditions.

### **Dry Handling & Braking**

* **UltraContact UC7** edges out Primacy in dry performance, with quicker braking and sharper handling: \~37.9 m stopping vs 40.3 m, and marginally faster slalom/braking times ([toptirereview.com][2], [toptirereview.com][1]).
* Felt “very predictable and potent” during test drives ([wapcar.my][3]).

---

## 🎧 Noise & Comfort

* **UC7** is quieter and more comfort-focused, scoring better in NVH tests (\~58.3 dB vs 58.8 dB) and comfort ratings (7.2/10 vs 6.6/10) ([toptirereview.com][1]).
* User reviews echo this:

  > “my car is also using… UC6 SUV… very comfortable (ride became softer) and very quiet” ([reddit.com][4])
  > “Got myself UC7… way quieter than primacy 4” ([forum.lowyat.net][5])

---

## ⛽ Rolling Resistance & Fuel Economy

* **UC7** offers lower rolling resistance (\~7.21 N/kN vs 8.2 N/kN), which translates to better fuel efficiency ([toptirereview.com][1]).
* Primacy may have slightly higher rolling resistance but compensates with weight savings and refined compound design ([toptirereview.com][6]).

---

## 🔧 Durability & Build

* **Tread depth**: UC7 (≈7.31 mm) deeper than Primacy (≈6.82 mm), implying potentially longer wear and better aquaplaning ([toptirereview.com][6]).
* **Construction**: Primacy has dual-ply and thicker underlay—stronger build; UC7 uses single ply with slightly thinner underlay .

---

## 💰 Price & Value

* **UC7** is more budget-friendly —≈RM 580 vs RM 680 for Primacy (225/45R18) ([toptirereview.com][7]).
* In Malaysia, Primacy SUV+ and Continental UC6 SUV are comparably priced (\~6% difference) .

---

## 🗣️ Community Highlights

* UC7 praised as a comfort champion:

  > “If noise is your only priority… tyres such as UC7 … best bet.” ([reddit.com][8], [reddit.com][4])
  > “I would go with the UltraContact as its a better 'touring' tyre… the difference isn't huge.” ([reddit.com][9])
* Michelin side:

  > “Michelin is always the right answer…” ([reddit.com][10])
  > “Michelin Tires are the tire equivalent of 'Buy It For Life'… very well manufactured.” ([reddit.com][11])

---

## ⚙️ Summary Table

Feature	Michelin Primacy SUV+	Continental UltraContact UC7
------------------	-------------------------------------	------------------------------------
Wet Performance	**Excellent**, best-in-class	Very good, but slightly behind
Dry Performance	Strong performer	Slightly better dry braking/handling
Noise & Comfort	Quiet, but a touch firmer	**Quieter & smoother ride**
Rolling Resistance	Moderate	**Lower**, more fuel-efficient
Durability	Solid build, slightly shallower tread	**Deeper tread, robust build**
Price (MYR)	\~RM 680/pc	\~RM 580/pc
Ideal For	Wet safety, premium feel	All-round comfort, efficiency, value

---

## 🛞 Product Options

Here are the current popular SKUs:

### [Michelin Primacy SUV+]()

#### Premium wet‑biased SUV tyre
### [Continental UltraContact UC7]()

#### Comfort and efficiency SUV tyre
**[Michelin Primacy SUV+]()**: Renowned for wet grip, low noise, and strong build quality—premium option.

**[Continental UltraContact UC7]()**: Excellent on comfort, dry braking, and fuel economy—great value.

---

## ✅ Which Should You Pick?

* **Choose *Primacy SUV+*** if you prioritize **best-in-class wet performance**, robust construction, and are willing to pay a bit more.
* **Choose *UltraContact UC7*** if you want **quiet, efficient, comfortable driving** at a lower price—with still very strong overall capability.

---

Let me know your typical driving conditions (city vs highway, wet/dry climates, load), and I can help fine-tune the recommendation!

[1]: https://toptirereview.com/michelin-primacy-...rce=chatgpt.com "SUV show down ! Michelin Primacy SUV vs Continental UC6 SUV - Top Tire Review"
[2]: https://toptirereview.com/2023-top-tire-rev...rce=chatgpt.com "2023 Top Tire Review APAC Touring Tire Test - Top Tire Review"
[3]: https://www.wapcar.my/news/57735review-cont...rce=chatgpt.com "Review: Continental UltraContact UC7 - The comfort touring tyre with a performance edge | WapCar"
[4]: https://www.reddit.com/r/kereta/comments/1e...rce=chatgpt.com "Advice on new tyres..."
[5]: https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/5420880/%2B0...rce=chatgpt.com "Conti UltraContact UC7 vs Michelin Primacy 4 ST"
[6]: https://toptirereview.com/tire-cross-sectio...rce=chatgpt.com "Tire Cross Section Analysis : Michelin Primacy 4 ST vs Continental UltraContact 7 - Top Tire Review"
[7]: https://toptirereview.com/continental-ultra...rce=chatgpt.com "Continental UltraContact UC7 vs Michelin Primacy 4 ST - Top Tire Review"
[8]: https://www.reddit.com/r/kereta/comments/1f...rce=chatgpt.com "Car tyres for wet roads"
[9]: https://www.reddit.com/r/TyreReviews/commen...rce=chatgpt.com "I can't decide"
[10]: https://www.reddit.com/r/CarsAustralia/comm...rce=chatgpt.com "Quiet tyres"
[11]: https://www.reddit.com/r/tires/comments/1ap...rce=chatgpt.com "Are the Michelin Tires really all that good or just overrated?"
Fresh from chatgpt.

I think you should just keep to 0W20 for RS. RS engine start up at very high rpm in order to charge the battery. So the lighter viscosity 0W20 will lubricate faster. So unless your are constantly running high speed on long highway drive, just stick to 0W20 for better engine startup lubrication. Most of engine piston wear comes from engine startup.

sounds reasonable. maybe will stick to 0W20. at moment using 5W30. Somehow i feel the car response is a bit sluggish. not sure its real or just my feeling.

sounds reasonable. maybe will stick to 0W20. at moment using 5W30. Somehow i feel the car response is a bit sluggish. not sure its real or just my feeling.

to owners of G6 RS owners, can give some insights on your own experience owning the car so far?

1. Hybrid eHEV using e-CVT gearbox means it doesn't have the actual CVT belting? so no issue on broken CVT if kasi tekan minyak kaw2 during acceleration?

2. how is the FC on 100% town driving vs 50% town 50% highway?

3. any issues faced so far? steering rack issue still persists?

4. how much is the annual roadtax + insurance?

5. is it really quiet?

6. how often the hybrid battery will start to generate energy if let say parking for long time? Upon reaching 2 bar, it will recharge automatically until fill up to 4 bar then stop charging, similar to my city hybrid i-dcd?
I might want to trade in my 8 year old Honda BRV to buy this CRV G6 RS eHEV. My Honda SA says honda malaysia got give RM8,000 rebate + RM5,000 service voucher, but it's valid till end of this month only.

i already have a 7 year old Honda city i-dcd hybrid but this is used mainly for going to work & travelling short to medium distance <100km though. Mileage clock in 95,000km.
For balik kampung and long distance trip, i use BRV. Mileage clock in 125,000km so far.

thanks guys.

to owners of G6 RS owners, can give some insights on your own experience owning the car so far?

1. Hybrid eHEV using e-CVT gearbox means it doesn't have the actual CVT belting? so no issue on broken CVT if kasi tekan minyak kaw2 during acceleration?

The name e-CVT caused many confusion for many people.

e-CVT is in reality NOT a CVT gearbox. It is actually a single speed gear system called reduction gears that is similar to EV. No belt, no pulley, much lesser numbers of bearing and physical gears. It is much more reliable, longer lifespan and less wear and tear (will still wear and tear gradually especially with aggressive driving  but with lesser parts, lesser points of failure and wear). Still need to change transmission oil but due to the much smaller gear system with no belt and pulley, need only small amount of oil change and very
much longer change interval.

However unlike EV pure reduction gear, eHev is a hybrid that require switching from motor to wheel to engine to wheel, in the case of iMMD system via a lock-up clutch. The entire switching system are including as part of the complex so-called e-CVT gear system rather than just the simple EV reduction gear system.

Then why they call it eCVT when it has nothing to do with CVT gear system?
it is actually not referring to physical mechanical CVT gear structure but more for the marketing gimmicks that relates the current CVT smooth and gearless driving feel to the uninformed.

If fact, we can just remove the name e-CVT and call it reduction gear or single gear system but that will clash with the true simple EV reduction gear as we still require lock-up clutch system to switch between motor and engine to wheel. Toyota uses the same name, for the same reason, marketing and branding gimmick and also gives those old-school gearbox drivers some driving feel reference. Toyota uses their proprietary planetary gear system to do the switch instead of lock-up clutch.

If you talking about low to mid torque acceleration sluggish, that is likely not related to your oil usage. The torque response should come from motor, not engine at that torque range unless you go pedal to metal.

yes im referring to the low torque.

at same time i changed the 12v battery. donno it has anything to do or not.

someone mentioned in their video that Honda uses the term eCVT because they want to simplify the explanation. When potential buyer ask about the transmission, just reply eCVT. hahaha