PS4 are top of a top-of-the-line product, wet grip is the best. Toyo are just mid tyres. If u concern about grip, wet traction, never ever buy Continental tyres, be it UC series or MC series. That brand are not ok for wet traction

conti brand go until CPC (not CPCC) and CSC baru good

I am from malaysia bro, its just that mine is low spec S version with 7-inch headunit. But nvrtheless, found the vehicle setting at meter cluster area.. controlled using the home and scroll button at steering wheel..

mine maybe is still new. cornering at 80-85km/h on sharp bend is still beri stable.

I too find Continental very bad on wet. CC6 ad UC6

So far, no complaint on the Toyo but then I haven't got chance to compare it to the Michelin.

my previous ride was on mc6. Beri goot! Of course it was a sedan. Lol

My house got one x50 using uc6, and my wife crv las time using Toyo now change to primacy suv+. So to me, no much difference btw uc6 and primacy in wet condition. But primacy is more quiet than UC6. Toyo in wet condition is poorer.

But in dry condition, I feel Toyo is better in acceleration. Maybe because Toyo's thread is lower. But tyre noise is the worst compare to UC6 and Primacy

Overall I would say Primacy > UC6 > Toyo, of course same in terms of price, lol.

The pevious Toyo last for 52000++ km before I change them to primacy

heard that primacy is a soft tyre. quiet but suffer on handling.

it has a soft sidewall..have to sacrifice the performance but when it come to comfort, will be better. my previous FC, i didnt regret switching from PS4 to P4.

This post has been edited by fazleysyam: May 18 2025, 11:09 AM

.
That is correct, that is why I can't drive the car in aggressive way after change to primacy, lol, feel like car body roll become more obvious. Toyo is better in handling, but it is very noisy.

maybe will change to conti in one years time. i don't like soft sidewall. i found the toyo 's decibels are bearable in high speed. lol

hi guys..one question here. which produce more efficient output when it comes to aircond compressor, and why?

belt driven (E/S/V) or electric (RS)

No idea but CRV's air cond is the coldest compared to all my other cars

On the other hand, the previous gen HRV has the worst air cond I encountered.

have to agree with that la. so far my setting temp is at 24 and the fan speed is at the 1st. very seldom have to increase the fan speed.
its just i wonder which will perform better between belt driven and electric.

anyone know what's the green lights on the rear view mirror?

That's the Auto-Dim function. If no light, no autodim.

Noted! Thanks for the heads up

I also wonder if Honda improved their air-cond coldness.

My City eHev aircond with electrical compressor also very cold. Usually switch to temp 26 auto for daytime and 26 (not auto, minimum fan) for night or early morning.
Already pretty cold. Other cars have to use 23 to 24 to achieve the same coldness with higher fan blast.

So far I have never gone below that temp. Other cars always 24 to hit that coldness.

Coldest AC i had faced are those Campro based Proton car, that was the coldest AC, even night time can make it like sitting inside fridge. Honda car on Accord also cold, putting 25-26 with higher fan speed is enough for me and cold

Conti car, tried latest Peugeot 408, need to put 19-20C only felt cold, same like others Conti brand car.

This post has been edited by ayamxxx: May 30 2025, 09:26 AM