» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
Bro, these are not arguments centered around Christianity, it's about inter-faith relationship and so happens that Christianity was brought into the picture. I believed it is the same for all religions.
These are logic as to why Christians act the way they do and the main reason why I do not see a big problem having a inter-faith relationship. At the end of the day, every religion have their own stern practice which they have to adhere to. My point is this, society is moving forward and so does each and every individual in it. I am sure you realize day by day you see youngsters, stray further from traditional practices, not knowing why somethings are done the way they should. Heck, even some of the old people do not know why "you do not cut finger nails when you are pregnant".
When asked, they'll answer you "my parents told me" and when further question, you'll be shut off abruptly or rather, rudely.
We live in a society of "hybrids" where everything can intervene harmoniously without necessarily getting into a dispute and it all starts from one's mentality. If we use reasons to understand why somethings are done then we will know whether we can step over it or compromise it. You do not take a concrete wall head on when a sledgehammer is available to you, now.
Take the evolution of female swimsuit for instance, back in the days, swimsuits were very very conventional but as society progresses, it understands the purposes of the suit and eventually, it becomes what we see today but as much as I like it to be as little clothes as possible (=P), there must always be a limit/bar on how low can it go before it becomes unacceptable.
I trust you have watched the Singapore movie "Long Long Time Ago 2", do you remember the scene where the Chinese family and the Indian family talks about how their children's marriage be done? It may not be an accurate depiction of reality but a fairly close one. Now, replace the issue at hand with religion, the same scenario will be reached. It is about compromising.
Extreme perceptions like "marrying out a son", i believe will most probably "die" along when our parents passes. They kept to that perception because they grew up in a very specific society conditioned to evoke that kind of sentiment. For us, it will change, not all, but mostly. The latter generations are mostly taught to think critically, "outside the box" or think in the 4th dimension as some psychicists would phrased in.
As far as funeral goes, paying your last respect to the dead is part of the ritual of sending off. Nothing more, nothing less. The rest to me (no offense) are just "acts" to ease the conscience of the mind, enabling one to sleep soundly at night knowing that you have provided a "proper" channel for the dead to pass on to the next but you also said it yourself "no one knows".
Back to my reasoning, is respecting the death more important than respecting him/her when he/she is still alive and well? Is spending more time at his/her wake bears more weigh than spending time with him/her when he/she is alive and can respond to you?
Sorry to hear about your lost and I apologize in advance that I need to discuss this in the context of your grandfather since you bought it up. You did what you are told because you were told, the reason i guess was negligible because you have forgotten about it and it's not even a year since has passed. Our brain is hot wired to remember important things and forget the less important ones. You remembered you do what you did because it was for your grandfather (because you cared for him) but you forgot the reason why you did the "act" (simply because the act is not important). I deduce, that it was done to avoid society's scorn.
Your grandfather has an idea on how his funeral should be conducted and the wishes of the death must be carried out to its best possible. Now, let me put you in this hypothetical situation. What happens if ALL of your grandfather's descendants or who is entitled to "carry the flag and buy water" converted to Christian (extreme example) and no one is left to carry out the ritual?
Would it be more sensible to carry out a simple sending off OR to not carry out any funeral at all?
Your answer to my question will be the answer to your question to me previously on "what happens if the child is the only son in the family and the mother is not allowed to carry on the ritual". Part of my answer is that eventually, the family will have to resort to the next best thing and the remaining part of the answer will be revealed to you when you deliberate an answer to my question.
Jul 3 2017, 05:58 PM

Quote
0.0262sec
0.70
5 queries
GZIP Disabled