QUOTE(WooTz @ Apr 14 2017, 08:03 AM)
Now the technical guy is estimating $80-100 for the next bull run
It's always a good time to buy.
Goddamn PH delaying my bank transfers. I want to buy at $43 
Somehow today is speedy, bought more at $49.90
Next bull run being when?
Around end May?
QUOTE(kmarc @ Apr 14 2017, 08:41 AM)
Nice. Got a bit of bullets from Dash but I'm watching at the sides first. I think past one month I already bought in at 40, 42, 44, 46, 47, 49, 52.......

It's a terrible feeling, when I'm all out of bullets and cannot do anything except watch on the sidelines......
QUOTE(archangel22 @ Apr 14 2017, 08:57 AM)
Thanks. Nice read.

I qoute a part of article:
"I do not agree with Japan and what has happened in Japan, nobody knows. It is our country, our nation. […] The RBI has to take action and I will see that they do take action." India Finance Ministry.
It's like Japan is with SegWit and India isn't.

QUOTE(kmarc @ Apr 14 2017, 09:14 AM)
That's the part I do not understand. Governments are trying to combat money laundering but accepting bitcoins means they don't mind illegal money going in or out. I think India will go against bitcoin unless they can regulate it. If they accept without conditions, then their action of scrapping their two largest denominations would have been a futile endeavor, not to mention the chaos they created when they suddenly abolish those denominations.
In my humble honest opinion, for us normal innocent law-abiding people, getting bitcoin regulated or trackable is not a problem. We just want the ease of using bitcoin for transactions anywhere in the world. The government can track me all they want because I have nothing to hide.

I still don't fully understand the feature of anonymity in cryptocurrencies unless you want to hide something?

I think India is just being jealous and sour because they know they screwed up big time with the demonetisation exercise.
Their original intention was probably right, but the execution was not well thought out.
The unique feature with bitcoin (or let's say cryptocurrencies in general) is that it is, for practical purposes, untraceable. More so with zero knowledge features like with Monero.
However, many people forget that the world's most widespread and most untraceable currency has always been available and has been in use for thousands of years, and that is physical CASH, be it gold, silver, coins or notes.
Cryptocurrency is no different from cash, it just brings it into the digital world.
You have to separate between regulated and traceable. Having bitcoin regulated is mostly accepted by the public, when it comes to buying, selling, trading, KYC, how exchanges work, etc. but traceability is not acceptable (and anyway goes against the whole design and decentralised nature of the bitcoin protocol itself)
It might not mean very much when you first think about it, but consider that anonymity in cryptocurrency affects not just the user, but also each and every person he has ever transacted with, and by extension, each and every other person that they have transacted with, ad infinitum.
At some point, this reaches outwards in an all-encompassing web that will include each and every bitcoin user.
Add to this scenario the fact that the blockchain includes each and every transaction ever performed from Day One, working backwards, and you have the entire financial history and economic standing of each and every bitcoin user.
Then, consider the fact that this can potentially be extrapolated to link to your real-world identity, and the identities of every other person.
Bear in mind that in a traceable scenario, you have absolutely no say in this......you are just traceable and identifiable, your entire history......there is no privacy.
This is what the cryptocurrency community is against.
Privacy is not secrecy.
Even if you have nothing to hide, I am sure you don't want your private affairs to be broadcast on a permanently public ledger.